unextendable.gemspec in unextendable-0.1.0 vs unextendable.gemspec in unextendable-0.1.1

@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@
   s.platform    = Gem::Platform::RUBY
   s.authors     = ["Paul Engel"]
   s.email       = ["[e-mail]"]
   s.homepage    = "https://github.com/archan937/unextendable"
   s.summary     = %q{A small gem making unextending extended module methods within object instances possible}
-  s.description = %q{Unextendable originated from the thought of being able to implement the "State pattern":http://tobyho.com/Design_Patterns_Revisited%3A_State within object instances using modules. In other words: I wanted object instances to behave dependent on their state using modules. I really want to use modules because they are commonly used to define a set of methods which you can extend within an object instance. Unfortunately, you cannot just unexclude a module. So after searching the web for solutions, I came across Mixology, evil-ruby and StatePattern. But they slightly did not fit the picture. So after doing some research, I came up with Unextendable.}
+  s.description = %q{Unextendable originated from the thought of being able to implement the State pattern within object instances using modules. In other words: I wanted object instances to behave dependent on their state using modules. I really want to use modules because they are commonly used to define a set of methods which you can extend within an object instance. Unfortunately, you cannot just unexclude a module. So after searching the web for solutions, I came across Mixology, evil-ruby and StatePattern. But they slightly did not fit the picture. So after doing some research, I came up with Unextendable.}
 
   s.rubyforge_project = "unextendable"
 
   s.files         = `git ls-files`.split("\n")
   s.test_files    = `git ls-files -- {test,spec,features}/*`.split("\n")