README.md in sharing-0.1.1 vs README.md in sharing-0.2.0

- old
+ new

@@ -1,9 +1,13 @@ # Sharing -A secret sharing Ruby library. +![GitHub Workflow Status](https://img.shields.io/github/workflow/status/davidwilliam/sharing/Ruby) +Sharing is a Ruby gem with implmementations of secret sharing schemes with homomorphic properties. Although secret sharing schemes and multiparty computation protocols are distinct notions, multiparty computation protocols are typically enabled by secret sharing schemes. In this setting, security comes from the use of multiple parties. If they collude, all security is lost, but satisfactory levels of security can be established by trusting a subset of them will not to collude. In many settings where corrupting security requires corrupting all the parties, and considering you are one of the computing parties, security is guaranteed if you are one of the parties. + +Computing linear functions is trivial. Each non-linear operation however requires interaction between the parties/extra steps (for most secret sharing schemes). + ## Installation Add this line to your application's Gemfile: ```ruby @@ -25,10 +29,17 @@ - A first version of the Shamir's secret sharing - The second of two modified versions of the CRT-based Asmuth-Bloom scheme proposed by Ersoy et al. # Usage +In the examples below, there are two main levels of execution: + +- Computations performed by the owner of the secrets (those are computations using instance methods) +- Computations performed over the secret shares (those are computations using class methods) + +This distiction is important since we are showing everything at once here, for completeness and for clarity. However it is important to keep in mind that after the secret shares are generated, the computations over the shares are intended to be computed independetly by each participant (party), each one with their corresponding shares. + ## Shamir's Secret Sharing V1 The Shamir's secret sharing v1 scheme is based on the work of Adi Shamir in [How to Share a Secret](https://web.mit.edu/6.857/OldStuff/Fall03/ref/Shamir-HowToShareASecret.pdf). ### n-out-of-n Shamir Secret Sharing @@ -56,13 +67,13 @@ We reconstruct the secrets as follows: ```ruby reconstructed_secret1 = sss.reconstruct_secret(shares1) -# => (22/1) +# => 22 reconstructed_secret2 = sss.reconstruct_secret(shares2) -# => (36/1) +# => 36 ``` We can compute linear functions without requiring communication between the share holders: ```ruby @@ -78,22 +89,22 @@ and we can check that: ```ruby sss.reconstruct_secret(shares1_add_shares2) -# => (58/1) +# => 58 sss.reconstruct_secret(shares2_sub_shares1) -# => (14/1) +# => 14 sss.reconstruct_secret(shares1_smul_scalar) -# => (44/1) +# => 44 sss.reconstruct_secret(shares1_sdiv_scalar) -# => (11/1) +# => 11 ``` ### Using Hensel Codes -The gem Secret Sharing takes advantage of the gem [Hensel Codes](https://github.com/davidwilliam/hensel_code) for homomorphically encoding rational numbers as integers in order to compute over the integers and yet obtain results over the rationals. +The gem Secret Sharing takes advantage of the gem [Hensel Code](https://github.com/davidwilliam/hensel_code) for homomorphically encoding rational numbers as integers in order to compute over the integers and yet obtain results over the rationals. As most (if not all) of secret sharing schemes over finite fields `F_p` for `p > 2`, the secret inputs are naturally required to be positive integers in `F_p`. In this way, if we compute subtraction and we end up with a result that is negative, the reconstruction will fail (provided we don't have any econding in place). Same will occur if we compute a scalar division involving a scalar that is not a divisor of the corresponding secret. For addressing this and many other arithmetic problems, we can use Hensel codes to allow secret inputs to be positive and negative rational numbers. ```ruby rational_secret1 = Rational(2,3) @@ -141,17 +152,17 @@ We reconstruct the secrets: ```ruby reconstruct_secret1_add_secret2 = sss.reconstruct_secret(shares1_add_shares2) -# => 3361138990/1 +# => 3361138990 reconstruct_secret1_sub_secret2 = sss.reconstruct_secret(shares1_sub_shares2) -# => 2174854642/1 +# => 2174854642 reconstruct_shares1_smul_scalar = sss.reconstruct_secret(shares1_smul_scalar) -# => 1383998411/1 +# => 1383998411 reconstruct_shares1_sdiv_scalar = sss.reconstruct_secret(shares1_sdiv_scalar) -# => 3044796497/1 +# => 3044796497 ``` and we can check that: ```ruby @@ -163,10 +174,98 @@ # => 10/3 HenselCode::TruncatedFinitePadicExpansion.new(sss.p, 1, reconstructed_shares1_sdiv_scalar).to_r # => 2/15 ``` +### Multiplication + +As we previously saw, linear functions are easy to compute with shares created by an instance of Shamir's secret sharing scheme. Non-linear functions need some strategy that require extra steps in other to successfuly achieve the desired results. We implement multiplication in the context of Shamir's secret sharing scheme following the approach discussed by Dan Bognadov in [Foundations and properties of Shamir's secret sharing scheme - Research Seminar in Cryptography](https://uuslepo.it.da.ut.ee/~peeter_l/teaching/seminar07k/bogdanov.pdf). + +We define an instance of Shamir's secret sharing scheme with the following parameters: + +```ruby +params = { lambda_: 16, total_shares: 6, threshold: 3 } +# => {:lambda_=>16, :total_shares=>6, :threshold=>3} +sss = Sharing::Polynomial::Shamir::V1.new params +# => #<Sharing::Polynomial::Shamir::V1:0x0000000105423640 @lambda_=16, @p=49367, @threshold=3, @total_shares=6> +``` + +As before, we define the secrets and create shares for them: + +```ruby +secret1 = 13 +secret2 = 28 +shares1 = sss.create_shares(secret1) +# => [[1, 43064], [2, 20333], [3, 30554], [4, 24360], [5, 1751], [6, 12094]] +shares2 = sss.create_shares(secret2) +# => [[1, 7983], [2, 18517], [3, 31630], [4, 47322], [5, 16226], [6, 37076]] +``` + +We combine both shares on a single array in preparation for the multiplication steps: + +```ruby +operands_shares = [shares1, shares2] +# => [[[1, 43064], [2, 20333], [3, 30554], [4, 24360], [5, 1751], [6, 12094]], [[1, 7983], [2, 18517], [3, 31630], [4, 47322], [5, 16226], [6, 37076]]] +``` + +Recall we are working with a t-out-of-n secret sharing scheme and this is actually required in this setting. We have a total of `n = 6` shares and threshold `t = 3`. In order to correctly recover the result of the multiplication over shares, we need to select any combination of `2 * t - 1` shares out of the total number of shares: + +```ruby +selected_shares = Sharing::Polynomial::Shamir::V1.select_mul_shares(sss.total_shares, sss.threshold, operands_shares) +# => => [[[2, 20333], [1, 43064], [5, 1751], [3, 30554], [4, 24360]], [[2, 18517], [1, 7983], [5, 16226], [3, 31630], [4, 47322]]] +``` + +Now we have everything we need to compute multiplication over the secret shares, which we do in two rounds. First round: + +```ruby +mul_round1 = Sharing::Polynomial::Shamir::V1.mul_first_round(selected_shares, sss.total_shares, sss.threshold, sss.lambda_, sss.p) +# => [[2, [[1, 25284], [2, 5881], [3, 2537], [4, 15252], [5, 44026], [6, 39492]]], [1, [[1, 36061], [2, 17299], [3, 32435], [4, 32102], [5, 16300], [6, 34396]]], [5, [[1, 30221], [2, 32724], [3, 33210], [4, 31679], [5, 28131], [6, 22566]]], [3, [[1, 46172], [2, 33017], [3, 8081], [4, 20731], [5, 21600], [6, 10688]]], [4, [[1, 12410], [2, 39133], [3, 5920], [4, 11505], [5, 6521], [6, 40335]]]] +``` + +Then we perform the second round: + +```ruby +mul_round2 = Sharing::Polynomial::Shamir::V1.mul_second_round(mul_round1) +# => [[1, 150148], [2, 128054], [3, 82183], [4, 111269], [5, 116578], [6, 147477]] +``` + +Then we only need a number equal to the threshold to reconstruct the result of the multipliction over the shares: + +```ruby +selected_multiplication_shares = mul_round2.sample(sss.threshold) +# => [[6, 147477], [2, 128054], [1, 150148] +sss.reconstruct_secret(selected_multiplication_shares) +# => 364 +``` + +and we can check that + +```ruby +secret1 * secret2 +# => 364 +``` + +### t-out-of-n Secret Sharing + +Now we defined a threshold value that is less than the total number of shares: + +```ruby +params = {total_shares: 5, threshold: 3, lambda_: 16} +# => {:total_shares=>5, :threshold=>3, :lambda_=>16} +sss = Sharing::Polynomial::Shamir::V1.new params +# => #<Sharing::Polynomial::Shamir::V1:0x000000010b046e90 @lambda_=16, @p=61343, @threshold=3, @total_shares=5> +secret = 25 +# => 25 +shares = sss.create_shares(secret) +# => [[1, 54707], [2, 50401], [3, 48450], [4, 48854], [5, 51613]] +selected_shares = shares.sample(3) +reconstructed_secret = sss.reconstruct_secret(selected_shares) +# => 25 +``` + +Everything else works the sabe as before except the fact that only `3` shares are required to reconstruct the secret. + ## Asmuth-Bloom V2 The Asmuth-Bloom V2 was proposed by Ersoy et al. in in [Homomorphic extensions of CRT-based secret sharing](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166218X20303012)). The reference is a CRT-based secret sharing scheme introduced by Asmuth-Bloom in [A modular approach to key safeguarding](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1056651). We have currently the class `Sharing::CRT::AsmuthBloom::V2`. To initialize it, we need to pass the following parameters: @@ -237,6 +336,6 @@ Bug reports and pull requests are welcome on GitHub at https://github.com/davidwilliam/sharing. ## License -The gem is available as open source under the terms of the [MIT License](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT). +The gem is available as open source under the terms of the [MIT License](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT). \ No newline at end of file