features/mocks/stub_model.feature in rspec-rails-2.11.4 vs features/mocks/stub_model.feature in rspec-rails-2.12.0

@@ -6,53 +6,53 @@
   helper), it is especially useful in view examples, which are inherently
   more state-based than interaction-based.
    
   Scenario: passing an Active Record constant with a hash of stubs
     Given a file named "spec/models/widget_spec.rb" with:
-      """
+      """ruby
       require "spec_helper"
 
       describe "stub_model(Widget) with a hash of stubs" do
         let(:widget) do
           stub_model Widget, :id => 5, :random_attribute => true
         end
         
         it "stubs :id" do
-          widget.id.should eql(5)
+          expect(widget.id).to eql(5)
         end
         
         it "stubs :random_attribute" do
-          widget.random_attribute.should be_true
+          expect(widget.random_attribute).to be_true
         end
         
         it "returns false for new_record? if :id is set" do
-          widget.should_not be_new_record
+          expect(widget).not_to be_new_record
         end
         
         it "can be converted to a new record" do
           widget.as_new_record
-          widget.should be_new_record
+          expect(widget).to be_new_record
         end
       end
       """
     When I run `rspec spec/models/widget_spec.rb`
     Then the examples should all pass
     
   Scenario: passing an Active Record constant with a block of stubs
     Given a file named "spec/models/widget_spec.rb" with:
-      """
+      """ruby
       require "spec_helper"
 
       describe "stub_model(Widget) with a block of stubs" do
         let(:widget) do
           stub_model Widget do |widget|
             widget.id = 5
           end
         end
         
         it "stubs :id" do
-          widget.id.should eql(5)
+          expect(widget.id).to eql(5)
         end
       end
       """
     When I run `rspec spec/models/widget_spec.rb`
-    Then the examples should all pass
\ No newline at end of file
+    Then the examples should all pass