features/mocks/mock_model.feature in rspec-rails-2.4.1 vs features/mocks/mock_model.feature in rspec-rails-2.5.0

@@ -35,11 +35,11 @@
           end
         end
       end
       """
     When I run "rspec spec/models/car_spec.rb"
-    Then the output should contain "3 examples, 0 failures"
+    Then the examples should all pass
 
   Scenario: passing a string that represents an existing constant
     Given a file named "spec/models/widget_spec.rb" with:
       """
       require "spec_helper"
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@
           widget.should be_a(Widget)
         end
       end
       """
     When I run "rspec spec/models/widget_spec.rb"
-    Then the output should contain "1 example, 0 failures"
+    Then the examples should all pass
 
   Scenario: passing a class that does not extend ActiveModel::Naming
     Given a file named "spec/models/string_spec.rb" with:
       """
       require "spec_helper"
@@ -64,11 +64,11 @@
           expect { mock_model(String) }.to raise_exception
         end
       end
       """
     When I run "rspec spec/models/string_spec.rb"
-    Then the output should contain "1 example, 0 failures"
+    Then the examples should all pass
 
   Scenario: passing an Active Record constant
     Given a file named "spec/models/widget_spec.rb" with:
       """
       require "spec_helper"
@@ -93,11 +93,11 @@
           widget.id.should be_nil
         end
       end
       """
     When I run "rspec spec/models/widget_spec.rb"
-    Then the output should contain "4 examples, 0 failures"
+    Then the examples should all pass
 
   Scenario: passing an Active Record constant with method stubs
     Given a file named "spec/models/widget_spec.rb" with:
       """
       require "spec_helper"
@@ -126,6 +126,6 @@
           end
         end
       end
       """
     When I run "rspec spec/models/widget_spec.rb"
-    Then the output should contain "3 examples, 0 failures"
+    Then the examples should all pass