features/built_in_matchers/equality.feature in rspec-expectations-2.99.2 vs features/built_in_matchers/equality.feature in rspec-expectations-3.0.0.beta1

- old
+ new

@@ -11,41 +11,38 @@ semantics. rspec-expectations ships with matchers that align with each of these methods: ```ruby - a.should equal(b) # passes if a.equal?(b) - a.should eql(b) # passes if a.eql?(b) - a.should == b # passes if a == b + expect(a).to equal(b) # passes if a.equal?(b) + expect(a).to eql(b) # passes if a.eql?(b) + expect(a).to be == b # passes if a == b ``` It also ships with two matchers that have more of a DSL feel to them: ```ruby - a.should be(b) # passes if a.equal?(b) - a.should eq(b) # passes if a == b + expect(a).to be(b) # passes if a.equal?(b) + expect(a).to eq(b) # passes if a == b ``` - These are a useful pair if you wish to avoid the warning that Ruby emits on - `a.should == b` - Scenario: compare using eq (==) Given a file named "compare_using_eq.rb" with: """ruby describe "a string" do it "is equal to another string of the same value" do - "this string".should eq("this string") + expect("this string").to eq("this string") end it "is not equal to another string of a different value" do - "this string".should_not eq("a different string") + expect("this string").not_to eq("a different string") end end describe "an integer" do it "is equal to a float of the same value" do - 5.should eq(5.0) + expect(5).to eq(5.0) end end """ When I run `rspec compare_using_eq.rb` Then the output should contain "3 examples, 0 failures" @@ -53,21 +50,21 @@ Scenario: compare using == Given a file named "compare_using_==.rb" with: """ruby describe "a string" do it "is equal to another string of the same value" do - "this string".should == "this string" + expect("this string").to be == "this string" end it "is not equal to another string of a different value" do - "this string".should_not == "a different string" + expect("this string").not_to be == "a different string" end end describe "an integer" do it "is equal to a float of the same value" do - 5.should == 5.0 + expect(5).to be == 5.0 end end """ When I run `rspec compare_using_==.rb` Then the output should contain "3 examples, 0 failures" @@ -75,19 +72,19 @@ Scenario: compare using eql (eql?) Given a file named "compare_using_eql.rb" with: """ruby describe "an integer" do it "is equal to another integer of the same value" do - 5.should eql(5) + expect(5).to eql(5) end it "is not equal to another integer of a different value" do - 5.should_not eql(6) + expect(5).not_to eql(6) end it "is not equal to a float of the same value" do - 5.should_not eql(5.0) + expect(5).not_to eql(5.0) end end """ When I run `rspec compare_using_eql.rb` @@ -97,19 +94,19 @@ Given a file named "compare_using_equal.rb" with: """ruby describe "a string" do it "is equal to itself" do string = "this string" - string.should equal(string) + expect(string).to equal(string) end it "is not equal to another string of the same value" do - "this string".should_not equal("this string") + expect("this string").not_to equal("this string") end it "is not equal to another string of a different value" do - "this string".should_not equal("a different string") + expect("this string").not_to equal("a different string") end end """ When I run `rspec compare_using_equal.rb` @@ -119,18 +116,18 @@ Given a file named "compare_using_be.rb" with: """ruby describe "a string" do it "is equal to itself" do string = "this string" - string.should be(string) + expect(string).to be(string) end it "is not equal to another string of the same value" do - "this string".should_not be("this string") + expect("this string").not_to be("this string") end it "is not equal to another string of a different value" do - "this string".should_not be("a different string") + expect("this string").not_to be("a different string") end end """ When I run `rspec compare_using_be.rb`