lib/rdf/vocab/cert.rb in rdf-vocab-3.1.5 vs lib/rdf/vocab/cert.rb in rdf-vocab-3.1.6
- old
+ new
@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@
# #
# # Ontology for Certificates and crypto stuff.
# #
# # Ontology for Certificates and crypto stuff. This is in development. Some other ontologies to look at: * http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/crypto + has cwm builtins: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/Trust - a bit old perhaps. It imports daml+oil - would help to be more completely specified - uses literals as subjects a little liberally, which makes this a bit difficult to work with frameworks that don't permit this * http://xmlns.com/wot/0.1/ - limited very much to PGP (though on can map PGP to X509) - a little coarse grained, mixes up the PGP certificate with the PGP public key * Todo: - add some classes and relations for DSA - should this all be in one file? Or should this be cut up a little? Say one file for the general CERT ontology, and then files for RSA, DSA, PGP, etc... Or perhaps it does not really matter? - expand more on the certification side of things - verify this by security experts - owl2 has some constructs for combined inverse functional properties. This may be useful to use in defining an RSA key which is identified by two numbers. - also create html version of the spec by using this as a template. - should comments such as this be in html?
# # @see http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
- # # @see http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/rsa
# # @see http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/X509Uml.svg
+ # # @see http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/rsa
# class CERT < RDF::StrictVocabulary
# # A certificate is a Document that is signed. As explained here http://www.pgpi.org/doc/pgpintro/#p16 'A digital certificate consists of three things: * A public key. * Certificate information. ('Identity' information about the user, such as name, user ID, and so on.) * One or more digital signatures.'
# # @return [RDF::Vocabulary::Term]
# attr_reader :Certificate
#