Documentation/comparison.haml in rainbows-0.9.0 vs Documentation/comparison.haml in rainbows-0.90.0

@@ -90,10 +90,17 @@
     %td.tee No
     %td.r18 Slow*
     %td.r19 Yes
     %td.rbx No
     %td.slow Yes
+  %tr.comp_row
+    %td.mod RevFiberSpawn
+    %td.tee Yes
+    %td.r18 No
+    %td.r19 Yes
+    %td.rbx No
+    %td.slow Yes
 %ul
   %li
     RevThread* + 1.8 performance is bad with Rev <= 0.3.1.
     Rev 0.3.2 (when it is released) should be much faster under 1.8.
   %li
@@ -189,10 +196,16 @@
     %td.slowio
       thread-safe Ruby,
       %a(href="http://rev.rubyforge.org/") Rev
     %td.thr Yes
     %td.reent No
+  %tr.comp_row
+    %td.mod RevFiberSpawn
+    %td.slowio
+      %a(href="Rainbows/Fiber/IO.html") Rainbows::Fiber::IO
+    %td.thr No
+    %td.reent Yes
 
 %ul
   %li
     Requirements for single thread reentrancy are loose in that there is
     no risk of race conditions and potentially mutually exclusive to
@@ -274,18 +287,18 @@
   %tr.comp_row
     %td.mod FiberSpawn
     %td.devfd Yes
     %td.app_pool Yes
     %td.lock No!
-    %td.async Rainbows::Fiber{::IO,.sleep}
+    %td.async Rainbows::Fiber::IO, Rainbows.sleep
     %td.ws Sunshowers
   %tr.comp_row
     %td.mod FiberPool
     %td.devfd Yes
     %td.app_pool Yes
     %td.lock No!
-    %td.async Rainbows::Fiber{::IO,.sleep}
+    %td.async Rainbows::Fiber::IO, Rainbows.sleep
     %td.ws Sunshowers
   %tr.comp_row
     %td.mod ActorSpawn
     %td.devfd no-op
     %td.app_pool Yes
@@ -304,9 +317,15 @@
     %td.devfd Yes
     %td.app_pool Yes
     %td.lock Dumb
     %td.async standard Ruby
     %td.ws no
+  %tr.comp_row
+    %td.mod RevFiberSpawn
+    %td.devfd Yes
+    %td.app_pool Yes
+    %td.lock No!
+    %td.async Rainbows::Fiber::IO, Rainbows.sleep
 
 %ul
   %li
     "No!" means it's fundamentally incompatible, use an
     %a(href="Rainbows/AppPool.html") AppPool