README.md in rack-service_api_versioning-0.1.0 vs README.md in rack-service_api_versioning-0.1.1
- old
+ new
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
<h1>Rack::ServiceApiVersioning</h1>
-[![Join the chat at https://gitter.im/rack-service_api_versioning/Lobby](https://badges.gitter.im/rack-service_api_versioning/Lobby.svg)](https://gitter.im/rack-service_api_versioning/Lobby?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=badge&utm_campaign=pr-badge&utm_content=badge)
+[![Join the chat at https://gitter.im/jdickey/rack-service_api_versioning](https://badges.gitter.im/jdickey/rack-service_api_versioning.svg)](https://gitter.im/jdickey/rack-service_api_versioning?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=badge&utm_campaign=pr-badge&utm_content=badge)
This Gem implements three Rack middleware components that, together, enable possibly multiple API Versions of one or more Component Services to be active at the same time. Incoming requests for a service specify their version requirements, if any, with an `Accept` HTTP header.
----
@@ -94,10 +94,10 @@
1. Ensure that your changes are completely covered by *passing* specs, and comply with the [Ruby Style Guide](https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide) as enforced by [RuboCop](https://github.com/bbatsov/rubocop). To verify this, run `bundle exec rake`, noting and repairing any lapses in coverage or style violations;
1. Commit your changes (`git add .; git commit`). Please *do not* use a single-line commit message (`git commit -am "some message"`). A good commit message notes what was changed and why in sufficient detail that a relative newcomer to the code can understand your reasoning and your code. We **recommend** (but do not yet enforce) commit messages conforming to [these conventions](http://karma-runner.github.io/1.0/dev/git-commit-msg.html);
1. Push to the branch (`git push origin NNN-my-new-feature`). Remember that the first time pushing a branch to a remote requires an "unconditional" push (`git push -u origin NNN-my-new-feature`);
1. Create a new Pull Request. In the initial message, reference the open issue where your feature has been discussed; if no such issue exists (why?), then describe at some length the rationale for your new feature; your implementation strategy at a higher level than each individual commit message; anything future maintainers should be aware of; and so on. Modifications to existing code *must* have been discussed in an issue for PRs containing them to be accepted and merged;
1. Don't be discouraged if the PR generates further discussion leading to further refinement of your PR through additional commits. These should *generally* be discussed in comments on the relevant issue; discussion in the Gitter room (see below) may also be useful;
-1. If you've comments, questions, or just want to talk through your ideas, come hang out in the project's [room on Gitter](https://gitter.im/rack-service_api_versioning). Ask away!
+1. If you've comments, questions, or just want to talk through your ideas, come hang out in the project's [room on Gitter](https://gitter.im/jdickey/rack-service_api_versioning). Ask away!
## License
The gem is available as open source under the terms of the [MIT License](http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT).