spec/integration/associations_spec.rb in pg_search-2.0.1 vs spec/integration/associations_spec.rb in pg_search-2.1.0

@@ -281,11 +281,11 @@
 
         model do
           include PgSearch
           belongs_to :another_model, :class_name => 'AssociatedModel'
 
-          pg_search_scope :with_associated, :associated_against => {:another_model => [:title, :author]}
+          pg_search_scope :with_associated, :associated_against => {:another_model => %i[title author]}
         end
       end
 
       it "should only do one join" do
         included = [
@@ -327,18 +327,18 @@
       end
 
       with_model :Model do
         table do |t|
           t.integer 'number'
-          t.belongs_to 'another_model'
+          t.belongs_to 'another_model', index: false
         end
 
         model do
           include PgSearch
-          belongs_to :another_model, :class_name => 'AssociatedModel'
+          belongs_to :another_model, class_name: 'AssociatedModel'
 
-          pg_search_scope :with_associated, :associated_against => {:another_model => :number}
+          pg_search_scope :with_associated, associated_against: {another_model: :number}
         end
       end
 
       it "should cast the columns to text" do
         associated = AssociatedModel.create!(:number => 123)
@@ -452,11 +452,11 @@
         t.belongs_to :company
       end
 
       model do
         include PgSearch
-        pg_search_scope :search, :against => :title, :using => [:tsearch, :trigram]
+        pg_search_scope :search, :against => :title, :using => %i[tsearch trigram]
       end
     end
 
     # https://github.com/Casecommons/pg_search/issues/106
     it "should handle numbers in a trigram query properly" do
@@ -493,10 +493,10 @@
         t.belongs_to :company
       end
 
       model do
         include PgSearch
-        pg_search_scope :search, :against => :title, :using => [:tsearch, :trigram]
+        pg_search_scope :search, :against => :title, :using => %i[tsearch trigram]
       end
     end
 
     # https://github.com/Casecommons/pg_search/issues/106
     it "should handle numbers in a trigram query properly" do