Gemfile in knife-18.1.0 vs Gemfile in knife-18.2.5

@@ -1,29 +1,26 @@
-source "https://rubygems.org"
-
-gem "knife", path: "."
-
-# proxifier gem is busted on ruby 3.1 and seems abandoned so use git fork of gem
-gem "proxifier", git: "https://github.com/chef/ruby-proxifier", branch: "lcg/ruby-3"
-
-group(:development, :test) do
-  gem "cheffish", ">= 14" # testing only , but why didn't this need to explicit in chef?
-  gem "webmock" # testing only
-  gem "rake"
-  gem "rspec"
-  gem "chef-bin", path: "../chef-bin"
-end
-
-group(:omnibus_package, :pry) do
-  gem "pry"
-  gem "pry-byebug"
-  gem "pry-stack_explorer"
-end
-
-group(:chefstyle) do
-  gem "chefstyle", git: "https://github.com/chef/chefstyle.git", branch: "main"
-end
-
-gem "ohai", git: "https://github.com/chef/ohai.git", branch: "main"
-gem "chef", path: ".."
-gem "chef-utils", path: File.expand_path("../chef-utils", __dir__) if File.exist?(File.expand_path("../chef-utils", __dir__))
-gem "chef-config", path: File.expand_path("../chef-config", __dir__) if File.exist?(File.expand_path("../chef-config", __dir__))
+source "https://rubygems.org"
+
+gem "knife", path: "."
+
+group(:development, :test) do
+  gem "cheffish", ">= 14" # testing only , but why didn't this need to explicit in chef?
+  gem "webmock" # testing only
+  gem "rake"
+  gem "rspec"
+  gem "chef-bin", path: "../chef-bin"
+end
+
+group(:omnibus_package, :pry) do
+  gem "pry"
+  gem "pry-byebug"
+  gem "pry-stack_explorer"
+end
+
+group(:chefstyle) do
+  gem "chefstyle", git: "https://github.com/chef/chefstyle.git", branch: "main"
+end
+
+gem "ohai", git: "https://github.com/chef/ohai.git", branch: "main"
+gem "chef", path: ".."
+gem "chef-utils", path: File.expand_path("../chef-utils", __dir__) if File.exist?(File.expand_path("../chef-utils", __dir__))
+gem "chef-config", path: File.expand_path("../chef-config", __dir__) if File.exist?(File.expand_path("../chef-config", __dir__))