spec/eotb_spec.rb in eotb-0.4.1 vs spec/eotb_spec.rb in eotb-0.4.2

- old
+ new

@@ -1,14 +1,26 @@ require File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/spec_helper') describe Eotb do - before(:each) do + before(:all) do @response = "200" Eotb.configure("0"*24) end + it "should format actor in string" do + Eotb.hash_format("actor", :actor).should == {"event[actor]" => "actor"} + end + + it "should format actor in hash" do + Eotb.hash_format({:type => "User"}, :actor).should == {"event[actor][type]" => "User"} + end + + it "should format actor in nested hash" do + Eotb.hash_format({:type => { :account => "User"}}, :actor).should == {"event[actor][type][account]" => "User"} + end + it "should register two arguments" do Eotb.register_event("actor", "action").code.should == @response end it "should register three arguments" do @@ -18,17 +30,21 @@ it "should register symbols" do Eotb.register_event(:actor, :action, {:username => "John"}).code.should == @response end it "should register objects" do - Eotb.register_event(Object.new, :action, {:username => Object.new}).code.should == @response + Eotb.register_event(Object.new, :action, {:username => Object.new}).code.should == @response end it "should register hashes" do - Eotb.register_event({:type => "User"}, :action, {:username => {:first_name => "John"}}).code.should == @response + Eotb.register_event({:type => "User"}, :action, {:username => {:first_name => "John"}}).code.should == @response end + it "should register nested hashes" do + Eotb.register_event({:type => { :account => "User"}}, :action, {:username => {:first_name => "John"}}).code.should == @response + end + it "should register arrays" do - Eotb.register_event([2,3,4], :action, {:username => ["John", "Josh"]}).code.should == @response + Eotb.register_event([2,3,4], :action, {:username => ["John", "Josh"]}).code.should == @response end end \ No newline at end of file