spec/lib/danica/function/name_spec.rb in danica-2.6.4 vs spec/lib/danica/function/name_spec.rb in danica-2.7.1
- old
+ new
@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
require 'spec_helper'
describe Danica::Function::Name do
- let(:x) { Danica::Wrapper::Variable.new(name: :x, latex: '\mu', gnu: 'u')}
+ let(:x) { Danica::Wrapper::Variable.new(name: :x, latex: '\mu', gnuplot: 'u')}
let(:subject) { described_class.new(name: :f, variables: [x]) }
+ it_behaves_like 'an object that respond to basic_methods'
+
describe '#to_tex' do
it 'returns the name of the function with tex variables' do
expect(subject.to_tex).to eq('f(\mu)')
end
@@ -16,10 +18,10 @@
expect(subject.to_tex).to eq('f(x)')
end
end
end
- describe '#to_tex' do
+ describe '#to_gnu' do
it 'returns the name of the function with tex variables' do
expect(subject.to_gnu).to eq('f(u)')
end
context 'when initializing variables from scratch' do