acceptance-features/dsl/policy_owner.feature in conjur-cli-5.1.1 vs acceptance-features/dsl/policy_owner.feature in conjur-cli-5.1.2

- old
+ new

@@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ end """ And I reset the command list Scenario: --as-group works - When I run `conjur policy load --as-group $ns/admin --collection $ns` interactively + When I run `conjur rubydsl load --as-group $ns/admin --collection $ns` interactively And I pipe in the file "policy.rb" And the command completes successfully And I reset the command list When I run `conjur role members policy:$ns/test-policy-1.0` Then the JSON should be: @@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ "cucumber:group:%{NAMESPACE}/admin" ] """ Scenario: --as-role works - When I run `conjur policy load --as-role group:$ns/admin --collection $ns` interactively + When I run `conjur rubydsl load --as-role group:$ns/admin --collection $ns` interactively And I pipe in the file "policy.rb" And the command completes successfully And I reset the command list When I run `conjur role members policy:$ns/test-policy-1.0` Then the JSON should be: @@ -35,10 +35,10 @@ "cucumber:group:%{NAMESPACE}/admin" ] """ Scenario: --as-group doesn't interfere with policy ownership of other resources - When I run `conjur policy load --as-group $ns/admin --collection $ns` interactively + When I run `conjur rubydsl load --as-group $ns/admin --collection $ns` interactively And I pipe in the file "policy.rb" And the command completes successfully And I reset the command list When I run `conjur resource show user:test_user@$ns-test-policy-1-0` Then the JSON at "owner" should be "cucumber:policy:%{NAMESPACE}/test-policy-1.0"