spec/install/gems/sources_spec.rb in bundler-1.7.13 vs spec/install/gems/sources_spec.rb in bundler-1.7.14
- old
+ new
@@ -287,6 +287,66 @@
bundle :install
expect(out).not_to include("Warning")
should_be_installed("rack 1.0.0")
end
end
+
+ context "when a single source contains multiple locked gems" do
+ before do
+ # 1. With these gems,
+ build_repo4 do
+ build_gem "foo", "0.1"
+ build_gem "bar", "0.1"
+ end
+
+ # 2. Installing this gemfile will produce...
+ gemfile <<-G
+ source 'file://#{gem_repo1}'
+ gem 'rack'
+ gem 'foo', '~> 0.1', :source => 'file://#{gem_repo4}'
+ gem 'bar', '~> 0.1', :source => 'file://#{gem_repo4}'
+ G
+
+ # 3. this lockfile.
+ lockfile <<-L
+ GEM
+ remote: file:/Users/andre/src/bundler/bundler/tmp/gems/remote1/
+ remote: file:/Users/andre/src/bundler/bundler/tmp/gems/remote4/
+ specs:
+ bar (0.1)
+ foo (0.1)
+ rack (1.0.0)
+
+ PLATFORMS
+ ruby
+
+ DEPENDENCIES
+ bar (~> 0.1)!
+ foo (~> 0.1)!
+ rack
+ L
+
+ bundle "install --path ../gems/system"
+
+ # 4. Then we add some new versions...
+ update_repo4 do
+ build_gem "foo", "0.2"
+ build_gem "bar", "0.3"
+ end
+ end
+
+ it "allows them to be unlocked separately" do
+ # 5. and install this gemfile, updating only foo.
+ install_gemfile <<-G
+ source 'file://#{gem_repo1}'
+ gem 'rack'
+ gem 'foo', '~> 0.2', :source => 'file://#{gem_repo4}'
+ gem 'bar', '~> 0.1', :source => 'file://#{gem_repo4}'
+ G
+
+ # 6. Which should update foo to 0.2, but not the (locked) bar 0.1
+ should_be_installed("foo 0.2")
+ should_be_installed("bar 0.1")
+ end
+ end
+
end