features/licenses.feature in berkshelf-3.0.0.beta4 vs features/licenses.feature in berkshelf-3.0.0.beta5

- old
+ new

@@ -6,11 +6,10 @@ * I have a Berksfile pointing at the local Berkshelf API with: """ cookbook 'fake', '1.0.0' """ - Scenario: when licenses is defined Given the cookbook store has the cookbooks: | fake | 1.0.0 | mit | And I have a Berkshelf config file containing: """ @@ -20,11 +19,10 @@ Then the output should not contain: """ is not in your list of allowed licenses """ - Scenario: when a license is not listed Given the cookbook store has the cookbooks: | fake | 1.0.0 | mit | And I have a Berkshelf config file containing: """ @@ -34,11 +32,10 @@ Then the output should contain: """ 'mit' is not in your list of allowed licenses """ - Scenario: when raise_license_exception is defined Given the cookbook store has the cookbooks: | fake | 1.0.0 | mit | And I have a Berkshelf config file containing: """ @@ -48,11 +45,10 @@ Then the output should not contain: """ is not in your list of allowed licenses """ - Scenario: when raise_license_exception is defined and a license is not listed Given the cookbook store has the cookbooks: | fake | 1.0.0 | mit | And I have a Berkshelf config file containing: """ @@ -62,10 +58,9 @@ Then the output should contain: """ 'mit' is not in your list of allowed licenses """ And the exit status should be "LicenseNotAllowed" - Scenario: when the cookbook is a path location Given the cookbook store has the cookbooks: | fake | 0.1.0 | mit | And I have a Berksfile pointing at the local Berkshelf API with: