features/commands/list.feature in berkshelf-3.0.0.beta6 vs features/commands/list.feature in berkshelf-3.0.0.beta7

@@ -1,56 +1,78 @@
 Feature: berks list
-  Scenario: Running the list command
+  Scenario: When everything is good
     Given the cookbook store has the cookbooks:
       | fake1 | 1.0.0 |
       | fake2 | 1.0.1 |
     And I have a Berksfile pointing at the local Berkshelf API with:
       """
       cookbook 'fake1', '1.0.0'
       cookbook 'fake2', '1.0.1'
       """
-    And the Lockfile has:
-      | fake1 | 1.0.0 |
-      | fake2 | 1.0.1 |
+    And I write to "Berksfile.lock" with:
+      """
+      DEPENDENCIES
+        fake1 (= 1.0.0)
+        fake2 (= 1.0.1)
+
+      GRAPH
+        fake1 (1.0.0)
+        fake2 (1.0.1)
+      """
     When I successfully run `berks list`
     Then the output should contain:
       """
       Cookbooks installed by your Berksfile:
         * fake1 (1.0.0)
         * fake2 (1.0.1)
       """
 
-  Scenario: Running the list command when the dependencies aren't downloaded
-    And I have a Berksfile pointing at the local Berkshelf API with:
+  Scenario: When the lockfile is not present
+    Given I have a Berksfile pointing at the local Berkshelf API with:
       """
       cookbook 'fake', '1.0.0'
       """
-    And the Lockfile has:
-      | fake | 1.0.0 |
     When I run `berks list`
     Then the output should contain:
       """
-      Could not find cookbook 'fake (1.0.0)'.
+      Lockfile not found! Run `berks install` to create the lockfile.
       """
-    And the exit status should be "CookbookNotFound"
+    And the exit status should be "LockfileNotFound"
 
-  Scenario: Running the list command when the lockfile isn't present
-    Given the cookbook store has the cookbooks:
-      | fake | 1.0.0 |
-    And I have a Berksfile pointing at the local Berkshelf API with:
+  Scenario: When a dependency is not in the lockfile
+    Given I have a Berksfile pointing at the local Berkshelf API with:
       """
       cookbook 'fake', '1.0.0'
       """
+    And I write to "Berksfile.lock" with:
+      """
+      DEPENDENCIES
+
+      GRAPH
+        not_fake (1.0.0)
+      """
     When I run `berks list`
     Then the output should contain:
       """
-      Could not find cookbook 'fake (= 1.0.0)'.
+      The lockfile is out of sync! Run `berks install` to sync the lockfile.
       """
-    And the exit status should be "CookbookNotFound"
+    And the exit status should be "LockfileOutOfSync"
 
-  Scenario: Running the list command with no dependencies defined
-    Given I have a Berksfile pointing at the local Berkshelf API
-    When I successfully run `berks list`
+  Scenario: When a dependency is not installed
+    Given I have a Berksfile pointing at the local Berkshelf API with:
+      """
+      cookbook 'fake', '1.0.0'
+      """
+    And I write to "Berksfile.lock" with:
+      """
+      DEPENDENCIES
+        fake (= 1.0.0)
+
+      GRAPH
+        fake (1.0.0)
+      """
+    When I run `berks list`
     Then the output should contain:
       """
-      There are no cookbooks installed by your Berksfile
+      The cookbook 'fake (1.0.0)' is not installed. Please run `berks install` to download and install the missing dependency.
       """
+    And the exit status should be "DependencyNotInstalled"