# ActionView::Component `ActionView::Component` is a framework for building view components in Rails. **Current Status**: Used in production at GitHub. Because of this, all changes will be thoroughly vetted, which could slow down the process of contributing. We will do our best to actively communicate status of pull requests with any contributors. If you have any substantial changes that you would like to make, it would be great to first [open an issue](http://github.com/github/actionview-component/issues/new) to discuss them with us. ## Roadmap This gem is meant to serve as a precursor to upstreaming the `ActionView::Component` class into Rails. It also serves to enable the usage of `ActionView::Component` in older versions of Rails. Preliminary support for rendering components was merged into Rails `6.1.0.alpha` in https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/36388. Assuming `ActionView::Component` makes it into Rails `6.1`, this gem will then exist to serve as a backport. ## Design philosophy As the goal of this gem is to be upstreamed into Rails, it is designed to integrate as seamlessly as possible, with the [least surprise](https://www.artima.com/intv/ruby4.html). ## Compatibility `actionview-component` is tested for compatibility with combinations of Ruby `2.4`/`2.5`/`2.6` and Rails `5.0.0`/`5.2.3`/`6.0.0`/`6.1.0.alpha`. ## Installation Add this line to your application's Gemfile: ```ruby gem "actionview-component" ``` And then execute: ```bash $ bundle ``` In `config/application.rb`, add: ```bash require "action_view/component" ``` ## Guide ### What are components? `ActionView::Component`s are Ruby classes that are used to render views. They take data as input and return output-safe HTML. Think of them as an evolution of the presenter/decorator/view model pattern, inspired by [React Components](https://reactjs.org/docs/react-component.html). ### Why components? In working on views in the Rails monolith at GitHub (which has over 3700 templates), we have run into several key pain points: #### Testing Currently, Rails encourages testing views via integration or system tests. This discourages us from testing our views thoroughly, due to the costly overhead of exercising the routing/controller layer, instead of just the view. It also often leads to partials being tested for each view they are included in, cheapening the benefit of DRYing up our views. #### Code Coverage Many common Ruby code coverage tools cannot properly handle coverage of views, making it difficult to audit how thorough our tests are and leading to gaps in our test suite. #### Data Flow Unlike a method declaration on an object, views do not declare the values they are expected to receive, making it hard to figure out what context is necessary to render them. This often leads to subtle bugs when we reuse a view across different contexts. #### Standards Our views often fail even the most basic standards of code quality we expect out of our Ruby classes: long methods, deep conditional nesting, and mystery guests abound. ### What are the benefits? #### Testing `ActionView::Component` allows views to be unit-tested. In the main GitHub codebase, our unit tests run in around 25ms/test, vs. ~6s/test for integration tests. #### Code Coverage `ActionView::Component` is at least partially compatible with code coverage tools. We’ve seen some success with SimpleCov. #### Data flow By clearly defining the context necessary to render a component, we’ve found them to be easier to reuse than partials. #### Performance In early benchmarks, we’ve seen performance improvements over the existing rendering pipeline. For a test page with nested renders 10 levels deep, we’re seeing around a 5x increase in speed over partials: ``` Comparison: component: 6515.4 i/s partial: 1251.2 i/s - 5.21x slower ``` _Rails 6.1.0.alpha, [joelhawksley/actionview-component-demo](https://github.com/joelhawksley/actionview-component-demo), /benchmark route, via `RAILS_ENV=production rails s`, measured with [evanphx/benchmark-ips](https://github.com/evanphx/benchmark-ips)_ ### When should I use components? Components are most effective in cases where view code is reused or needs to be tested directly. ### Building components Components are subclasses of `ActionView::Component::Base` and live in `app/components`. You may wish to create an `ApplicationComponent` that is a subclass of `ActionView::Component::Base` and inherit from that instead. Component class names end in -`Component`. Component module names are plural, as they are for controllers. (`Users::AvatarComponent`) Components support ActiveModel validations. Components are validated after initialization, but before rendering. Content passed to an `ActionView::Component` as a block is captured and assigned to the `content` accessor. #### Quick start Use the component generator to create a new `ActionView::Component`. The generator accepts the component name and the list of accepted properties as arguments: ```bash bin/rails generate component Example title content invoke test_unit create test/components/example_component_test.rb create app/components/example_component.rb create app/components/example_component.html.erb ``` #### Implementation An `ActionView::Component` is a Ruby file and corresponding template file (in any format supported by Rails) with the same base name: `app/components/test_component.rb`: ```ruby class TestComponent < ActionView::Component::Base validates :content, :title, presence: true def initialize(title:) @title = title end private attr_reader :title end ``` `app/components/test_component.html.erb`: ```erb <%= content %> ``` We can render it in a view as: ```erb <%= render(TestComponent, title: "my title") do %> Hello, World! <% end %> ``` Which returns: ```html Hello, World! ``` ##### Supported `render` syntaxes Components can be rendered via: `render(TestComponent, foo: :bar)` `render(component: TestComponent, locals: { foo: :bar })` The following syntax has been deprecated and will be removed in v2.0.0: `render(TestComponent.new(foo: :bar))` #### Error case If the component is rendered with a blank title: ```erb <%= render(TestComponent, title: "") do %> Hello, World! <% end %> ``` An error will be raised: `ActiveModel::ValidationError: Validation failed: Title can't be blank` ### Testing Components are unit tested directly. The `render_inline` test helper wraps the result in `Nokogiri.HTML`, allowing us to test the component above as: ```ruby require "action_view/component/test_helpers" class MyComponentTest < Minitest::Test include ActionView::Component::TestHelpers def test_render_component assert_equal( %(Hello, World!), render_inline(TestComponent, title: "my title") { "Hello, World!" }.to_html ) end end ``` In general, we’ve found it makes the most sense to test components based on their rendered HTML. #### Action Pack Variants To test a specific variant you can wrap your test with the `with_variant` helper method as: ```ruby def test_render_component_for_tablet with_variant :tablet do assert_equal( %(Hello, tablets!), render_inline(TestComponent, title: "my title") { "Hello, tablets!" }.css("span").to_html ) end end ``` ### Previewing Components `ActionView::Component::Preview`s provide a way to see how components look by visiting a special URL that renders them. In the previous example, the preview class for `TestComponent` would be called `TestComponentPreview` and located in `test/components/previews/test_component_preview.rb`. To see the preview of the component with a given title, implement a method that renders the component. You can define as many examples as you want: ```ruby # test/components/previews/test_component_preview.rb class TestComponentPreview < ActionView::Component::Preview def with_default_title render(TestComponent, title: "Test component default") end def with_long_title render(TestComponent, title: "This is a really long title to see how the component renders this") end end ``` The previews will be available in and . Previews use the application layout by default, but you can also use other layouts from your app: ```ruby # test/components/previews/test_component_preview.rb class TestComponentPreview < ActionView::Component::Preview layout "admin" ... end ``` By default, the preview classes live in `test/components/previews`. This can be configured using the `preview_path` option. For example, if you want to use `lib/component_previews`, set the following in `config/application.rb`: ```ruby config.action_view_component.preview_path = "#{Rails.root}/lib/component_previews" ``` ## Frequently Asked Questions ### Can I use other templating languages besides ERB? Yes. This gem is tested against ERB, Haml, and Slim, but it should support most Rails template handlers. ### What happened to inline templates? Inline templates have been removed (for now) due to concerns raised by [@soutaro](https://github.com/soutaro) regarding compatibility with the type systems being developed for Ruby 3. ### Isn't this just like X library? `ActionView::Component` is far from a novel idea! Popular implementations of view components in Ruby include, but are not limited to: - [trailblazer/cells](https://github.com/trailblazer/cells) - [dry-rb/dry-view](https://github.com/dry-rb/dry-view) - [komposable/komponent](https://github.com/komposable/komponent) - [activeadmin/arbre](https://github.com/activeadmin/arbre) ## Resources - [Rethinking the View Layer with Components, RailsConf 2019](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5Z5a6QdA-M) - [Introducing ActionView::Component with Joel Hawksley, Ruby on Rails Podcast](http://5by5.tv/rubyonrails/276) - [Rails to Introduce View Components, Dev.to](https://dev.to/andy/rails-to-introduce-view-components-3ome) - [ActionView::Components in Rails 6.1, Drifting Ruby](https://www.driftingruby.com/episodes/actionview-components-in-rails-6-1) - [Demo repository, actionview-component-demo](https://github.com/joelhawksley/actionview-component-demo) ## Contributing Bug reports and pull requests are welcome on GitHub at https://github.com/github/actionview-component. This project is intended to be a safe, welcoming space for collaboration, and contributors are expected to adhere to the [Contributor Covenant](http://contributor-covenant.org) code of conduct. We recommend reading the [contributing guide](./CONTRIBUTING.md) as well. ## License The gem is available as open source under the terms of the [MIT License](http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT).