Sha256: d912105b4335e22b8a7e2eabd974c5430eb4f5e6eb9c815e68fb9cdcb494ec19
Contents?: true
Size: 1.57 KB
Versions: 1
Compression:
Stored size: 1.57 KB
Contents
= escape_utils Being as though we're all html escaping everything these days, why not make it faster? At the moment escape_utils supports escaping and unescaping of HTML, but I wanna add URL encoding soon It has monkey-patches for Rack::Utils, CGI, ERB::Util and Haml == Installing gem install escape_utils == Usage === Escaping HTML html = `curl -s http://maps.google.com` escaped_html = EscapeUtils.escape_html(html) === Unescaping HTML html = `curl -s http://maps.google.com` escaped_html = EscapeUtils.escape_html(html) html = EscapeUtils.unescape_html(escaped_html) === Monkey Patches require 'escape_utils/rack' # to patch Rack::Utils require 'escape_utils/erb' # to patch ERB::Util require 'escape_utils/cgi' # to patch CGI require 'escape_utils/haml' # to patch Haml::Helpers == Benchmarks In my testing, escaping is around 10-20x faster than the pure ruby implementations in wide use today. While unescaping is around 24x faster than CGI.unescapeHTML - also pure ruby. This output is from my laptop using the benchmark scripts in the benchmarks folder. === Escaping Rack::Utils.escape_html 0.560000 0.040000 0.600000 ( 0.589475) ERB::Util.html_escape 0.450000 0.040000 0.490000 ( 0.492893) CGI.escapeHTML 0.460000 0.030000 0.490000 ( 0.490171) Haml::Helpers.html_escape 0.430000 0.010000 0.440000 ( 0.444694) EscapeUtils.escape_html 0.050000 0.010000 0.060000 ( 0.054799) === Unescaping CGI.unescapeHTML 1.140000 0.010000 1.150000 ( 1.148470) EscapeUtils.unescape_html 0.040000 0.000000 0.040000 ( 0.046166)
Version data entries
1 entries across 1 versions & 1 rubygems
Version | Path |
---|---|
escape_utils-0.1.0 | README.rdoc |