Sha256: cfb5929a11ee1c171ac7345a909ffdd51c7a5a50336136f98de8d47f7670a919
Contents?: true
Size: 1.38 KB
Versions: 5
Compression:
Stored size: 1.38 KB
Contents
require 'active_support/core_ext/range' module ActiveModel module Validations module Clusivity #:nodoc: ERROR_MESSAGE = "An object with the method #include? or a proc, lambda or symbol is required, " \ "and must be supplied as the :in (or :within) option of the configuration hash" def check_validity! unless delimiter.respond_to?(:include?) || delimiter.respond_to?(:call) || delimiter.respond_to?(:to_sym) raise ArgumentError, ERROR_MESSAGE end end private def include?(record, value) exclusions = if delimiter.respond_to?(:call) delimiter.call(record) elsif delimiter.respond_to?(:to_sym) record.send(delimiter) else delimiter end exclusions.send(inclusion_method(exclusions), value) end def delimiter @delimiter ||= options[:in] || options[:within] end # In Ruby 1.9 <tt>Range#include?</tt> on non-numeric ranges checks all possible values in the # range for equality, so it may be slow for large ranges. The new <tt>Range#cover?</tt> # uses the previous logic of comparing a value with the range endpoints. def inclusion_method(enumerable) enumerable.is_a?(Range) ? :cover? : :include? end end end end
Version data entries
5 entries across 5 versions & 2 rubygems