Sha256: c63ef5ca8a7331f1548628e66af702f2ce1be0b28801c4bd453294f1d58ce3d5
Contents?: true
Size: 1.28 KB
Versions: 2
Compression:
Stored size: 1.28 KB
Contents
/* Bugs item #872494, was opened at 2004-01-07 16:33 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=106556&aid=872494&group_id=6556 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Igor Proskuriakov (proskig) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: C++ class template specialization Initial Comment: Hi, some time ago I posted a bug related to C++ member template, which was fixed using patch bug849591.diff. Many thanks - it really fixed the problem ! Now about a different one. When parsing C++ file ctags seems to ignore template specialization, but I think that it maybe useful to add it as a configurable feature. Another problem is that template specialization seems to confuse patched version of ctags (patch bug849591.diff). When running a patched version against the following file */ template<class T> class TemplClass { double i;}; template<> class TemplClass< char* > { int i;}; class FooClass2{}; /* it does not generate tag for FooClass2 while ctags 5.5.2 does generate tag for FooClass2. Neither of them generate tag for specialization TemplClass<char *>. thanks in advance and let me know should you need more info! Igor */
Version data entries
2 entries across 2 versions & 1 rubygems
Version | Path |
---|---|
ctags.rb-1.1.4 | ext/vendor/ctags/Units/parser-cxx.r/bug872494.cpp.d/input.cpp |
ctags.rb-1.1.3 | ext/vendor/ctags/Units/parser-cxx.r/bug872494.cpp.d/input.cpp |