Sha256: b76efc50032c6595d5cba0e6cadfb2fd904e3c84974381c1dd4d4843d596eb4c
Contents?: true
Size: 1.82 KB
Versions: 12
Compression:
Stored size: 1.82 KB
Contents
require 'spec_helper'
describe GraphQL::StaticValidation::FieldsWillMerge do
let(:document) { GraphQL.parse("
query getCheese($sourceVar: DairyAnimal!) {
cheese(id: 1) {
id,
nickname: name,
nickname: fatContent,
fatContent
differentLevel: fatContent
similarCheeses(source: $sourceVar)
similarCow: similarCheeses(source: COW) {
similarCowSource: source,
differentLevel: fatContent
}
...cheeseFields
... on Cheese {
fatContent: name
similarCheeses(source: SHEEP)
}
}
}
fragment cheeseFields on Cheese {
fatContent,
similarCow: similarCheeses(source: COW) { similarCowSource: id, id }
id @someFlag
}
")}
let(:validator) { GraphQL::StaticValidation::Validator.new(schema: DummySchema, rules: [GraphQL::StaticValidation::FieldsWillMerge]) }
let(:errors) { validator.validate(document) }
let(:error_messages) { errors.map { |e| e["message" ] }}
it 'finds field naming conflicts' do
expected_errors = [
"Field 'id' has a directive conflict: [] or [someFlag]?", # different directives
"Field 'id' has a directive argument conflict: [] or [{}]?", # not sure this is a great way to handle it but here we are!
"Field 'nickname' has a field conflict: name or fatContent?", # alias conflict in query
"Field 'fatContent' has a field conflict: fatContent or name?", # alias/name conflict in query and fragment
"Field 'similarCheeses' has an argument conflict: {\"source\":\"sourceVar\"} or {\"source\":\"SHEEP\"}?", # different arguments
"Field 'similarCowSource' has a field conflict: source or id?", # nested conflict
]
assert_equal(expected_errors, error_messages)
end
end
Version data entries
12 entries across 12 versions & 1 rubygems