Fx86_64-linux**9 :W0*39**W* *3  **0Y*W9   :00H*007$*WH*W9   :00H*0I7*W0I0H*0I7*W0I0H*W*3)4>@MQTXe~    %i q **0 WJ**3 QI q y **9  :0*W0*3  a [a Y**0WJ**3akq Y**0WJ**3Yui **0!WJ**3  1Y a**W*0707 070*3 ')*I##  **07*&0'0(5*&0'0)Y*W0*=H*9  :W0*3  46GWY !"!"#$%Z%% **&0-0.Y*9  :W0*3(* !"%+q,,**07*0Y*W9   :00H*007*W5H*W00H*078*W*07*65*7H*W8H*W090H*078*W*07*:5*7H*W;H*W900H*W5*0*3 1<FHKORV^`bjnptx   "   &' 44&9'A'$**>0?*3)==9*Y*Y***W9   :C0,'0*3!( d )*+"1+AB)A,y,,,**W,0*3  , d *--AA%A.y...**00*3 ./EE9 0)0)0**00*3 ! "!/1GGA111**0 I*3$% &%2HHI31313**00*3() *)0.4JJQ444**00000*3,-.-!1235LLYY6y6y6**000007*5*O04*P*3012145(4+6/816!516!27NNa!9q9q9 **0O6 00BY*W7*5"*S00T00=4*P*3:;< =;?"@&?(B*C8DCBFEJGLE789&:9'$M:RRu=y== **0000B7*54*S00W9   :000=X=4*P*3IJKJMN-OEPJMMQQSSQ;< =:;< $$T>VVAAA **0!I6Z*3UVWVqCYY!DADAD**0000I*3YZ[Z!>1)E\\E F F**00*3]^ _ ^?@!G^^GGG**00W0*3bcdc) U !A6H`a1IQIYII**0, Y*W7*5*00bY*WcH*074*07*WdH*WeH52*WfH*WgH5*07*WhH*WiH*WjH*W4*P*3abfgfi*j4l<mDnNoXmZqdrnlptxuvy{}}7  d BCJ``OqPPP**0W0n,900*3 D d E+=!aRlmiSSS!!S**0,"*3  d F*UllUUU!U**007'*0IB7*05*0I5 *3!')46796::VppXX#X **007'*0IB7*05*0I5 *3!')46796::!Zrr)[A\$A\ WYY**WW0W0*3 HIJK U   1L]tuAy^^^%%_**W9 G:07*W0,&5*W0*3!(*M dNOPQ+_tt=Aayaa%a**W9 G:07 *Wx,5 *W0x,*3+-MN*R*.bwwQ!dYd'ad** 0* 0*0* 0* 0* 0* 0*" 0*$0*+0*0*/0120*30*<0*@0*D0*F0* 0*I0*K0*M0*Q0*U0*!0*[0*]0*_0*k!0*o#0*q$0*s%0*v'0*3&2>JVbnz $(,0:IU Y,]8aDP\htSSSSSSSSSSTUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSieyqrr %**0* +*3Siu9vavav** +*3  9wwww** +*3  xy!y!y* +3 y9zAzAzAz!ywqv t ))(i*.,I01Q3469!>BaDYFGQIUITYY\a!_dyz{|}~ =YHprNRV`^4EAtwLJ\lG_E_/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.4.0@cmor/gems/shoulda-matchers-4.1.0/lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/define_enum_for_matcher.rbE_
E_E_E__E_define_enum_forE__ E_ initialize_H_ E_ descriptionE_ backed by E_ with values _E_ , prefix: _E_ , suffix: _E_ with_values_E_withE_)The `with` qualifier on `define_enum_for`E_ `with_values`_E_ with_prefix__E_ with_suffix_ E_backed_by_column_of_type_Y_#E_matches?_%E_failure_messageE_ Expected E_ to E_. E_, but E_._,E_failure_message_when_negatedE_ not to E_ , but it did._}____4E_ expectationE_ , mapping E_, E_ and E_ prefixing accessor methods with E__E_, and E_ suffixing accessor methods with _=E_simple_descriptionE_define :E_ as an enum_AE_presented_enum_mappingE_block in presented_enum_mapping__EE_normalized_expected_enum_values_GE_expected_enum_value_namesE_expected_enum_values_JE_normalized_actual_enum_values_LE_actual_enum_values_NE_ enum_defined?E_no such enum exists on __RE_enum_values_match?E_ However, E_ actually maps _VE_column_type_matches?E_ is E_ columnE_expected_column_type__\E_column_^E_model_`E_enum_value_methods_exist?E_"block in enum_value_methods_exist?E_ does map to these E_values, but the enum is E_-configured with either a different prefix or E_%suffix, or no prefix or suffix at allE_0configured with either a different prefix or no E_ prefix at allE_0configured with either a different suffix or no E_ suffix at allE_ (we can't tell which)_lE_expected_singleton_methodsE_#block in expected_singleton_methods__pE_expected_prefix_rE_expected_suffix_tE_to_hashE_block in to_hash_wE_to_array_E_ShouldaE_MatchersE_ ActiveRecordE_DefineEnumForMatcherE_attribute_nameE_newE_@attribute_nameE_@optionsE_UtilE_a_or_anE_<Jco҈%fHi͊?Knzŋ$DlȌ-Efɍ/Jzώ7Vnԏ+E[sǐ5Ohʑ9[sӒ"