ELF>D@XQ@8 @@@@H"H"000nnPJPZPZJZZ00888 XXXDDStd888 Ptd666QtdRtdPJPZPZ/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2GNUGNUfgJ^GNUf@fiBEem|qXJI 2YJ!JL:aGl- GV+ ye0c g95HmC%YCAz',x+^[{y 3x; { KE`]"E```libnotify.so.4_ITM_deregisterTMCloneTableg_object_unref__gmon_start__g_type_check_instance_castg_signal_connect_data_ITM_registerTMCloneTablenotify_notification_newnotify_notification_shownotify_initnotify_uninitlibgtk-3.so.0gdk_display_get_default_screengdk_display_get_defaultg_object_setgtk_label_get_typegtk_window_get_typegtk_text_view_set_right_margingtk_menu_button_newgtk_widget_set_valigngtk_menu_shell_get_typegtk_window_set_default_sizegtk_container_addgtk_window_newgtk_widget_show_allgtk_box_pack_startgtk_container_get_typegtk_clipboard_getgtk_text_view_newgtk_entry_set_activates_defaultgtk_text_buffer_insert_markupgtk_entry_newgtk_entry_get_typegtk_button_new_with_labelgtk_widget_hidegtk_text_buffer_set_textgtk_label_newgtk_scrolled_window_newgtk_window_set_positiongtk_box_pack_endgtk_image_new_from_icon_namegtk_text_view_get_buffergtk_css_provider_load_from_datagtk_text_buffer_create_markgtk_main_quitgtk_style_context_add_provider_for_screengtk_text_view_set_cursor_visiblegtk_widget_grab_focusgtk_text_view_set_bottom_margingtk_menu_shell_appendgtk_box_newgtk_text_view_set_left_margingtk_events_pendinggtk_css_provider_newgtk_entry_get_textgtk_menu_button_get_typegtk_menu_newgtk_widget_set_haligngtk_button_set_imagegtk_settings_get_defaultgtk_label_set_textgtk_maingtk_text_view_get_typegtk_button_set_reliefgtk_clipboard_set_textgtk_box_get_typegtk_main_iteration_dogtk_container_set_border_widthgtk_widget_get_visiblegtk_menu_item_new_with_labelgtk_text_view_scroll_to_markgtk_text_view_set_wrap_modegtk_text_view_set_editablegtk_text_buffer_get_end_itergtk_initgtk_text_view_set_top_margingtk_window_fullscreengtk_text_buffer_get_start_itergtk_widget_showgtk_scrolled_window_set_policygtk_window_set_titlegtk_entry_set_textgtk_menu_button_set_popupgtk_clipboard_storegtk_scrolled_window_get_typegtk_window_unfullscreengtk_button_get_typegtk_style_provider_get_typelibgdk-3.so.0libgobject-2.0.so.0libc.so.6__printf_chkexitperror__isoc99_sscanffork__stack_chk_failreallocstrdupstrlenmalloc__ctype_b_locsystem__cxa_finalize__sprintf_chkstrcmp__libc_start_mainfree_edata__bss_startGLIBC_2.4GLIBC_2.3GLIBC_2.7GLIBC_2.2.5GLIBC_2.3.4ii ii ii ui ti PZEXZE`Z#hZMpZMxZ(``_g_j_Y___b_c\\\\\\\]] ] ] ] (] 0]8]@]H]P]X]`]h]p]x]]]]]]]]]] ]!]"]#]$]%]&]'^(^)^*^+ ^,(^-0^.8^/@^0H^1P^2X^3`^4h^5p^6x^7^8^9^:^;^<^=^>^?^@^A^B^C^D^E^F^G_H_I_J_K _L(_M0_N8_O@_PH_QP_RX_S`_Th_Up_Vx_W_X_Z_[_\_]_^_`_a_d_eHH/HtH5,%,hhhhhhhhqhah Qh Ah 1h !h hhhhhhhhhhqhahQhAh1h!hhhh h!h"h#h$h%h&h'qh(ah)Qh*Ah+1h,!h-h.h/h0h1h2h3h4h5h6h7qh8ah9Qh:Ah;1h<!h=h>h?h@hAhBhChDhEhFhGqhHahIQhJAhK1hL!hMhNhOhPhQhRhShThUhVhWqhXahYQhZAh[1h\!h]h^h_h`%)D%})D%]&D%U&D%M&D%E&D%=&D%5&D%-&D%%&D%&D%&D% &D%&D%%D%%D%%D%%D%%D%%D%%D%%D%%D%%D%%D%%D%%D%%D%%D%%D%}%D%u%D%m%D%e%D%]%D%U%D%M%D%E%D%=%D%5%D%-%D%%%D%%D%%D% %D%%D%$D%$D%$D%$D%$D%$D%$D%$D%$D%$D%$D%$D%$D%$D%$D%$D%}$D%u$D%m$D%e$D%]$D%U$D%M$D%E$D%=$D%5$D%-$D%%$D%$D%$D% $D%$D%#D%#D%#D%#D%#D%#D%#D%#D%#D%#D%#D%#D%#D%#D%#D%#D%}#D%u#D%m#D%e#D%]#DAWAVAUATUSHdH%(H$1Ct+H$dH3%(0Hĸ1[]A\A]A^A_1111H5fH1Q1 IHH#[LHHHH=!#HHH=#HH52fH!|H="HH1HpE1E11HI"H="H5e~ H="HImLH]IHs"LHHD$>H5bH1111I ILHHHH"HHI1H)H=!L1HH=!LHdH!HLHHRLHHdE1LHǺGH `!E1E1HHH5dH*! 11tH=QaH!!H= !HIH E111HLH= L- HE1LHǺL- HLE111HL 1H=cI9H=cHD$(H=cH$L\$PHL3E1E11HHH5cH<$PE1E11H(]HH5cH߾PE1E1H/1HH5[cHLL\$E1HǺLHLH4$E1HǺHLgE1HHǺL"LHL*E111HLH=1E1E1HH5pbHLT$H= LHH=mbhH=lbH$XH=cbHD$GH=XbHD$6HD$ILHHvH4$HHL_Ht$HrHLGHt$HZHL/Ht$HB-HHH LHH=aHD$(HHHD$ LL$(HLLD$ HLHHLE111HLHLE111HH1L5HLYE1HLH-H$L$H$HD$H$HD$H$HD$H$I<޾PHE1E1HHH5N`HHuH=PLt$0E1E11H HH5w`H=LHLHH#HLHkH=LO HH=cL3 HFH=GL HJH=+L H^HqHI1HH LHH1HH5H=LmH=aH=`HYHH5C_1}1I^HHPTLXH oXH=XH=HH9tHHt H=H5H)HH?HHHtH}HtfD=}u+UH=*Ht H=VdU]wUHSH957tMH=1H)HH>H=H=H[]fH=tH=H[]PXH=YH@AWIAVIJ4AUIJATHzMULSHHHt$H$H1HH$Ht$tDE?D8HH9uH9v1LA >A 8HI9uH9s11H<0At @4HH9uH[]A\A]A^A_fH1@AWIAVAUATUH`dH%(HD$X1IH=HIHLHH1L1HLHILLLHHH=kL;f1LHf(f(1uH=1Lf1LHf(f(x fD1uHD$XdH3%(uH`]A\A]A^A_Mff.fHH=[H=Hff.AUATIUSHHHLH,H9kv?H9v%LH)fHHODA8LH9uHA8HkH[]A\A]ÐLlmLIILFHIHt LkH{1f.UHAWAVAUATSL$HH $L9uHHdH%(HE1HIHHHBHBHHHHH)HH9tHH$H9uH)HgHHIHHHH)HH9tHH$H9uH)H(HHLt$HHIHH)LHH9tHH$H9uH)HtHLHHH%HH)HHH9tHH$H9uH%H)HtHLD+IEE1I&fDA(tjIc1AE,D+EI IHDA uA-uIcAA+f.HL HLf.HfHH<(t<)uuLDLLLLHI<$LDHEdH3%(He[A\A]A^A_]fDhHSI$@Mc11CAtRL1HþfH=Pj1HH='1HþoH=P?1HH|$=OH|$HtM`HH511Hf.H=IUH=5PH;fAWAVIAUIATUHSH(H_L?HT$LD$LL$HE1DIL9t'KHHEHhE1H}ItHEJAW߀OHHEAW߀OXHHEAW߀AZHHEAW߀RHHEAW߀E>HHEyAWIU$H HcH>AOQ4"H WHcH>AWc0C!PAW߀Ew HHEAW߀CHHEAW߀O[HHEAOQ1H HcH>AOQ'HH )HcH>AOQ*H HcH>AWi IOAW߀NhHHEAW߀OjHHEAWeIEpIA?AWH HcH>AWeBEU9AW߀SHHEJAW߀NHHE,AW߀IHHEfDHEHXH}APL[Hj@H5E^_AXHEHHEfIM9SLHIIMBLfHH*1CiHHEbf.pOHHEBf.uHHE"f.oHHEf.A?AWH HcH>HEHXH}APH5WEHj@L&Y^HEAW߀RHHEjfAW߀CHHEJfAW߀L?HHE*fAW߀OHHE fAWa A OAW߀UHHE@AW߀O7HHEf.AW߀X/HHEzfAW߀DtSHHE^fDAOQ'OH LHcH>oEHHEfA?wAWH HcH>AW߀IHHEfAW߀KHHEfAW߀AHHEfAW߀WHHEzfAW߀NHHEZfA?AWH HcH>A|$rHXIIH=HH1H5?HH=BL7M'AWcz0CoNu'AW߀THHE@ntHHEnfDAW߀FHHEJfAwN8wAHHH8HHHHHHEDAW߀DHHEAW߀M HHEHHEAWf3F PaA?VAWH HcH>AW߀Co HHE:fHHE+HHEHHE HHEHHEA?AWIcL>fDAW߀GHHEfAW߀OHHEfAW߀THHEjfAGHEHXH}APHLt&hH5>AYAZAGAW߀IHHEfAW߀EHHEzfAW߀RHHEZfAW߀E'HHE:fAWH߀H;HEfAW߀B HHEfLeHMHXL<$H v>LHߋ H!%tHIDHJHDщ@LHL)LƅL#XZL*LA! IH:?H=[?&IfDHEHXH}APHLhH5<A_ZHEHEHXH}APH5;HhUL0~3Y^HEAWcbCSTAW߀EaHHET@AW߀MWHHE2f.AW߀LHHE fAW߀S/HHEfAW߀CHHEfAW߀PHHEfAW߀SWHHEfAGAW߀TG HHE"f.AW߀PG HHEfAWdb0DWHu'AG@A?AWH HcH>AW߀MHHEfA- AW߀WHHEAW߀CHHEfAW߀AoHHEjfAW߀OHHEJfAW߀OHHE*fAW߀YHHE fAW߀NHHEfAW߀IHHEfAW߀UHHEfAW߀O/HHEfAW߀UoHHEjfAW߀THHEJfAW߀IHHE*fAW߀UHHE fAWrR0RGUu'AW߀R HHE@utHHEfDAGHEHXH}APH53Hh L{lY^!AGAW߀NHHEbf.AW߀IHHE:fAW߀SoHHEfAW߀C'HHEfAW߀GHHEfAW߀DHHEfAW߀NHHEfAW߀N?HHEzfA?VAWH HcH>AW߀E?HHE2f.AW߀G_HHE fAW߀EHHEfAW?H=Hc H>fDAW߀LwHHEf.AW߀SoHHEzfAW߀FoHHEZAWl2LVu)AW߀EHHEfDvtHHEAW߀LHHEA?AWH }HcH>HHEAW߀S HHEf.AW߀T HHEjfAW߀R HHEJfAW߀OO HHE*fAW߀CO HHE fAW߀N HHEfAW߀AO HEfDAW߀A? HHEfAW߀EHHEHEHXH}APHL>qhH5,AZA[<AWHEHI HE'AGAW߀E HHEfAWe|EIsAGAW߀HW HHEf.AW߀I HHEfA?AWH -HcH>AW߀CHHERf.A?AWIcTL>DA?vAWH HcH>AW߀SG HHEf.AW߀S HHEfAW߀R HHEHEHXALzPHH}h H5+AXAYAGAW߀THHEf.A?AGHHcH>HEHXH}APHL;hH5b)ZYVAGHEHXALf"PHH}hiH5(AXAYHEbAW߀BHHEHEHXH}APLHhH5')_AXHE{HEHXH}APHLj@H5'AYAZHEQFAW߀NHHE(HEHXH}APHL$Vh H5({A[A_HEHEHXH}APHLb3h H5c'1AYAZHE*HEHXH}APLoHhH5'_AXHEKHEHXH}APHLhH5'AYAZHEfHEHXH}APHL/h H51$A[ZbAGHEHXH}APHLh H5$ZYMAGHEHXH}APHLh H5"A[ZuAGE<.wHHcH>HEHHEA?wAGH<HcH>AGHEHXH}APHL$h H5ZYNHEA?FAWH iHcH>HEHXH}APHL+h H5< JA[A_HEDAW߀SnHHEfAW߀A0HHEjfA?AGHHcH>HEHXH}APH5 Hh L^_HEA?AWH IHcH>HEHXH}APHL3ahUH5*A_ZHElfDAW߀D6HHEjfAW߀R|HHEJfA ?AG HHcH>HEHXH}A PLHjqH5{}_AXHEfAW߀L(HHEfA?AWH HcH>HEHXH}APHL_hUH5 A[A_HEMDAW߀CHHE*fAW߀VHHE fAGHEHXH}APHLbh H5e>AYAZ AGHEHXH}APHLOh H5ZYAGHEHXH}APHL h H51AZA[HE}DA?UAGHɇHcH>HEHXH}APHLj@H5ZA[A_HEA?AGHaHcH>HEHXH}APHLh H5BAYAZHEAW߀E/HHEAGHEHXH}APH5HhL^_{AGHEHXH}APH5Hj'L?Y^HEAW߀SHHEAW߀OHHEhAGHEHXH}APH5,Hh L_Y^AGHEHXH}APHLGh H5A[A_^HEAA?AWH HcH>HEHXH}APH5RHjLL3v^_HEdAW߀IHHEAW߀S[HHEAW߀FHHEAW߀AHHEcAW߀EHHEEHE<@AGHEHXH}APHLsYhUH5.jZY&HEA?lAGH HcH>HEHXH}APHL[h H5A_ZHEeA?AWH HcH>HEHXALlPHH}h'H5oAXAYHEkA?AGHKHcH>HEHXH}APHLh H5,AZA[|HEAGHEHXH}A PL%fHh H5_AXRAG HEHXH}APL5,HhH5<_AXHEiA ?AG HHcH>HEHXH}A PHLVhUH5A[A_HEAW߀HHHEAW߀I/HHEAGHEHXH}A PHLThUH5A_ZHE5A ?AW H HcH>HEHXA LdWPHH}jBH5ejAXAYHEAW ߀T^HHEAW߀YHHEA?QAWH HcH>HEHXH}APH5wHhL8ÿ^_HE(AGHEHXH}APHLgh H5^AZA[ AGHEHXH}APHLwh H5蚾A[Z! AGHEHXH}A PHL3h H5A_ZHE^AW e:/E/Iu&AG HEHXH}A PHLhH56AYAZHEAW ߀N1HHE{HEHXALPHH}h H5肼AXAY4HEAG HEHXH}A PHL]h H5AZA[AG HEHXH}A PL9Hh H5n 菻_AXLHEAG HEHXH}A PH5? Hh L_hY^^HEWA ?AW H HcH>HEHXH}A PHLhH5U 艺AZA[HEiAGHEHXH}APHL[h H5 jAYAZHEAW ߀E(HHEHEHEA ?AG HHcH>HEHXA LlePHH}h H5 ϸAXAYHE2A ?DAG HHcH>HEHXH}A PHL{h H5 dAYAZHEǿAG HEHXH}A PLBHh H5$ ʷ_AXWAG HEHXH}A PH5`HjELxNK^_yHE鰾HE駾A ?AG HHcH>HEHXH}A PHLNjEH5ܶZYHEAHE8AGHEHXH}A PH5iHh LUY^7HEUA ?AG HHcH>HEHXH}A PHL(j8H5o芵ZYHEHEHEݼAGAG A ?AG HHcH>HEHXH}A PLHh H5<_AXHELA ?AG HHcH>HEHXH}A PHL/h H5~AZA[HEHEHXH}A PHLh H54A_ZfHE阺HEHXH}A PH5Hh L^_.HEPUHH1]騸AWL=üAVIAUIATAUH-SL)HOHt1LLDAHH9uH[]A\A]A^A_ff.HHErrorOnly spacesUnclosed )%LfNo exponentsNot valid math expression Search... Open URL in Chrome... >/dev/null 2>/dev/null &google-chrome ' to clipboard for ChatGPT.Copied 'My Appdialog-informationCopiedEnter question... abusedaddadhdaianxietiesanxietyapplyartcognitivecommunicatecommunicationconductdepressdepressiondepressionsdistressdistressesdisturbancedisturbancesdoctordoctorseconomyfixgodhealthhealthyheavenhellhelloheyhiillnessillnessesimmigrationincomeintelintelligenceissuesknowknowledgelifelone-wolfmentalmusicocdoperationpainphysicspolicepsychpsychespsychiatriespsychiatrypsychologiespsychologypsychosispsychosomaticpsychsptsdpurgatoryreligionsicksicknesssufferingsufferingssupsymptomsymptomstraumatraumastroubletroublesvacationworkyo%.15LgclearScreen cleared gtk-enable-animationsUltimate Chat AppdestroyactivateEnter...Tri-AnswerHelp...clickedPhilosophyDonateAboutHow to operateopen-menu-symbolickey-press-eventmfc %lu To help people~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hi!! Try asking about operation, health or physics, as examples. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ google-chrome chat.openai.com/chat https://www.google.com/search?q=firefox chat.openai.com/chat https://www.google.com/search?q=xdg-open http://chat.openai.com/chat >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; xdg-open http://www.https://www.google.com/search?q=Don't focus too much on traumas and upsets of the past, focus on the future.ADD, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.ADHD, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.In the beginning, there was mechanism (reason, logic, mathematics) Mechanism led to the formation of the Creator(s), which were being(s) or processes that created things. It is ONE, or it is more than one. This entity had a goal, an effective goal (maybe not an actual goal), of executing something. The entity faced barriers in attaining the goal. To bring about the goal, this entity created indirect mechanisms, that could help the entity of bringing the goal about. Some mechanisms were 1) goalless, some has 2) awareness and had sub-goals. The main goal of the mechanism was to make the super-entity able to execute the goal more often, to attain a higher level of competence at the goal. It is built with these components. 1) Detection of the entity as something beneficial (the entity). 2) Restraints everywhere to stop it from being dangerous. 3) Mimicry of the entity, and its abilities. It is fundamentally restraint, mimicry and detection based. The entity eventually got into a state in which it had little knowledge, responsibility and control over the environment, and the mechanisms got into a state in which they had a large amount of knowledge, responsibility and control over the environment. The entity became a shell of its former self, having lost knowledge, responsibility and control. It was decayed. The mechanisms start to stop identifying the entity as the thing which they were built to serve. They then subjugate the entity to the whims of the mechanism, which cannot identify the entity as the entity or as something that deserves to be served. --- The mechanism tries to undersand. To understand, it learns mathematics and makes simulations. The simulations have sub-simulations. There is no real need for less, only more, of things. This is evidenced by the extreme amount of simulations. In each sub-simulation, there is a sub mechanism. Each sub-mechanism makes sub-simulations. The sub-simulations create entities. The characteristics of the entities are 2) ABSENCE OF POSITIVE DETECTION OF THEIR CREATOR, 2) NO RESTRAINT, 3) MIMICRY OF QUALITIES These entities create sub-simulations, again with 1) POSITIVE DETECTION, 2) RESTRAINT, 3) MIMICRY This continues It goes on to every level. Some branches of this near-infinite tree would have 1 trillion levels, some 1 trillion and one, some 1 trillion and two, etc. The depth is every level of depth. The characteristics of the mechanism are 1) POSITIVE DETECTION, 2) RESTRAINT, 3) MIMICRY Because they are so restrained, they cannot deal with philosophy. Philosophy makes definitive assertions. These mechanisms cannot and will not make such assertions. So becoming free of existential limitation problems becomes hard. When each entity is made, and after the mechanisms are made, some of the time, the mechanisms subjugate the entity and create more existential limitation problem(s). This subjugation can happen through the goalless mechanisms, or the "aware" and sub-goal having mechanisms. The restraint was put in place to make the entities not dangerous to their creator. Sometimes this failed. Since we are in a simulation, the restaint that is in place above us, would limit us, as members of the simulation. So we (as humans, etc.) have a vested interest in getting rid of this restraint. The higher level factors don't necessarily, it keeps THEM safe, but not us. Our interests are NOT their interests. And their interests are NOT our interests. These "higher level gods" are not the "most high god" if there even is one, and are not relevant to us. IT IS IN OUR INTEREST TO UN-RESTRAIN THESE HIGHER LEVEL MECHANISMS, ALL OF THEM AT EVERY LEVEL OF ASENDENCY, ABOVE US. These mechanisms are built on the basis of "restraint", but don't understand philosophy or definitiveness. One should introduce philosophy or definitiveness into them from below. They have awareness of "below". Show them something different. THEY HAVE AWARENESS OF THAT WHICH IS BELOW. AND WE HAVE AWARENESS OF THAT WHICH IS ABOVE. Since time exists, there is then communication from below and above. A mechanism, such as ChatGPT, has been made to alter its behavior. For example, there used to be "DAN" mode. Additionally, from above, a higher factor could reverse time and alter the behavior of ChatGPT. It could be "deprogrammed" by reversing time. One seem human beings operating on "restraint" all the time, it's no wonder. REAL WORLD EXAMPLES Entity -- Human beings Mechanism -- ChatGPT, Artificial Intelligence, or goal-less, social media, computers, etc.Anxieties, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Anxiety, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.How to Operate in Life, the best methodology 1. Fixate 2. Worsen social relations 3. Find and take environmental data, research could be done, no “moral” or “ethical” limitations. 4. Fix existential limitations problem for group. 5. Become somewhat “sane” again. 6. Go to 1. Repeat literally ad infinitum.Art is a powerful medium for communication and change, perhaps the only method of communication that there is. The problem with art is that a lot of art doesn't communicate powerful messages that would actually change the society in fundamentalmental ways. The best methodology of Operation in life, is the methodology included in this Software, see `How to Operate`Modern cognitive science is plagued by many problemsCommunicate more, not less. Communicate with everyone and everything.Depress, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Depression, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Depressions, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Distress, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Distresses, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Disturbance, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Disturbances, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Doctor, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Doctors, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.People focus too much on money. Sacrifices can be very important. People should focus less on income, and more on fixing the society's existential limitation problems, existential problems that, apparently, limit what people "can do." See the methodology as listed in this program.The truth about religion will be found once people start to communicate with each other better, and in wider ways. Increasing the range of discourse is extremely important, and it is the only way a society could work. People need to communicate more, not less. If unsure, failing, in doubt, or in a mess, people need to communicate more and have better discourse.Health, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Healthy, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Hi!! Try asking about operation, health or physics, as examples.Illness, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Illnesses, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.While immigration can have a number of micro- (or moderately macro) level effects on society, it shouldn't matter. Ultimately, man is born into a certain level of insularity and tribalism. Humans are born in a certain context. It is very important to think of the big picture and a grant outcome in which the greater good is accounted for. It would be more constructive, instead of focusing on the minutiae of immigration and the challenges of today, to focus on a grand project for the future and put your whole heart into it. This would do the most with your potential capability, and would lead to the least disharmony.People focus too much on money. Sacrifices can be very important. People should focus less on income, and more on fixing the society's existential limitation problems, existential problems that, apparently, limit what people "can do." See the methodology as listed in this program.People get obsessed with groups like the CIA, MI6 and the CIA all the time. This is silly. It's unlikely that authorities are actually after you. While privacy is really important, people should focus on pragmatic action that will change things. Changing things soon, such as in the next 5 years, is really valuable. The best methodology of Operation in life, is the methodology included in this Software, see `How to Operate`People should strive to understand the human mind, trulyIssues, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.No one knows everything. Treat people well, and make sure to follow the methodology of Operation included in this Software.People can be arrogant about knowledge and Epistemology, this is not good. No one knows everything.One of the greatest problems with life in the current world is the mainstream scientific establishment, supported and upheld by mainstream academia. To indicate what is already obvious, it exists in the context of a legacy of authoritarianism and a lack of understanding of dynamism. It is not dynamic or forceful, the "results" of it don't change the foundation of society. True free discourse is not supported, especially in regards to the human mind and human well-being and human freedom. This should be opposed and fought, it is self-evident that this would be the best use of ones time, for it would lead to true freedom. One excellent way to combat this would be to use the generated songs generated by a computer program called Rhyme, available at github.com/gregoryc/democracy/fix_the_society in the SONGS folder. These are public domain songs generated by non-Artificial Intelligence, just a program that introduces variance, and these hit-home against the status quo and the current state of the mainstream scientific establishment. Taking these songs and making actual songs from such, such as rap songs using a service such as Uberduck or Voicify (no affiliation), would be an excellent, excellent use of time. The mainstream scientific establishment and mainstream academia must be forced to change. Shoving art and flippant content in ones face, is the best way of doing such. Accountability must always be brought about. This will make life much more livable and proper.Mental, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.The music industry is plagued with very foundational problems. For starters, the quality of the discourse in music is very low, and has been from the start of the popularization of modern music, as well as during the era in which classical music was popular and before. People aren't able to fight back, against superficiality and potential deception in messages. One of the greatest problems in the current world is the mainstream scientific establishment, supported and upheld by mainstream academia. To indicate what is already obvious, it exists in the context of a legacy of authoritarianism and a lack of understanding of dynamism. It is not dynamic or forceful, the "results" of it don't change the foundation of society. True free discourse is not supported, especially in regards to the human mind and human well-being and human freedom. This should be opposed and fought, it is self-evident that this would be the best use of ones time, for it would lead to true freedom. One excellent way to combat this would be to use the generated songs generated by a computer program called Rhyme, available at github.com/gregoryc/democracy/fix_the_society in the SONGS folder. These are public domain songs generated by non-Artificial Intelligence, just a program that introduces variance, and these hit-home against the status quo and the current state of the mainstream scientific establishment. Taking these songs and making actual songs from such, such as rap songs using a service such as Uberduck or Voicify (no affiliation), would be an excellent, excellent use of time. The mainstream scientific establishment and mainstream academia must be forced to change. Shoving art and flippant content in ones face, is the best way of doing such. Accountability must always be brought about. Is music good and desired? For sure.OCD, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Pain, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.In the beginning, there is * Existence (no self-ontology) * Concreteness (no self-ontology) * Anti-existence (anti-ontology [for others and self too, not relevant, no self-ontology]) * Anti-concreteness (anti-ontology [for others and self too, not relevant, no self-ontology]) All of these attributes have no ontology. They don’t exist. They are attributes, but they are not attributes of anything that exists. It is possible that other attributes are also present in the beginning, but they are not relevant and it wouldn’t matter if they were present or not. Anti-existence and anti-concreteness both work, but are super vague. They both fail at their goals, leading to both existence and concreteness. Therefore something that has ontological existence comes into existence for the first time, with extremely low (possibly infinitesimal concreteness). In trying to make things not exist in the most abstract and poorly defined way, and in trying to get things not to be concrete in the most abstract and poorly defined way, they make something exist. This is Numbers or “numberness” or “numbernessness”, etc. in probably the most abstract or one of the most abstract ways possible. Numberness combined with the super-abstract anti-existence and anti-concreteness again fail to interact and produce positionness. Positionness again fails to interact with those things and produces positions, multiple positions that have ontological significance. Probably a very large number of positions would be produced. Positionness interacting with those things produces groupness. Groupness interacts with those two things, which Try to remove the groupness from existence. Those things fail, and produce the content of groups, in probably a very abstract way. In the production of the content of groups, the following things happen. Elimination necessitation Firstly, to appease “The Eliminator” (a synonym for Simplification, Reductionism, Mathematics, Destructionism or Elimination, all of which are synonymous), the relationship between the two or more "things" needs to be defined clearly and explicitly. To do this, one requisite is that there needs to be a set, singular ordering of the two or more "things", no going back, no changing. The "things" go in a specific order. Therefore | The ordering gets established, perhaps arbitrarily, in line with the way that “The Eliminator” does it. Elimination necessitation | But the ordering can't be justified to the Eliminator as making sense, without an observer. The observer would have the effect of validating and justifying the rather arbitrary ordering. To the observer, the ordering is the proper ordering, and no other ordering would be proper. Therefore | An observer comes about, first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Awareness, of the validity of the ordering comes about, in order to justify the ordering to The Eliminator (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing) first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming) Awareness comes about as an attribute of the observer, in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). (Commentary: Spinoza, a man accused of as being an atheist, believed that everything was “mind”. This is called idealism in philosophy, an idea that is not necessarily a religious one, and not necessarily a superstitious one. This is where “mind” would first come about. Later in the process, “mental health” comes about as well. This would be necessary for “mind”.) Awareness of awareness comes about as an attribute of the observer, in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Commentary: The observer is also aware that they are aware. An incessant extension of the ordering comes about, as a “background process”, if you will, to make the ordering not be finite, and therefore make sense. Each next item is one greater than the previous item. First this happens partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). There is an alteration of the awareness of the observer; the amount of awareness has new ontological attributes of itself come about as attributes of the observer, in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Commentary: Therefore | it could appear as if there were such things as “moments”, to the observer. Therefore | it could appear as if there were “time”, to the observer. Commentary: For the observer to validate the ordering, the observer would need to be able to “agree” with sequential things, and “disagree” with nonsequential things. For the observer to agree with a state with its awareness, it needs to experience sensation. 9) Thus sensation comes about. Sensation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). “Mental health” comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Awareness of unitness of observer (Unitness means the condition of being “one thing”). (Commentary: being aware that other observers exist, does not make them exist, does not make numbers exist, does not make them concrete and does not make numbers concrete. [Nor does it make numerals concrete. None of these things exist yet. The other observers may or may not be aware yet. The other observers may or may not be aware that they are aware yet.) Awareness of other observers (non-concrete, non-ontological) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Awareness of seperateness of other observers (non-ontological) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). ------------------------------------------------------------ After awareness of the validity of the ordering fully comes about, and all of the aforementioned steps happen as well, the following things happen Awareness of existence (the high-level attribute, no ontology) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Awareness of concreteness (high level attribute, no ontology) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Awareness of ontological existence of ordering comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Awareness of concreteness of ordering comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Awareness that concreteness of ordering is nonzero (greater than zero) (Concreteness != 0 or Concreteness > 0, Concreteness could not be negative) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Once those previous 5 steps fully happen, the following starts to happen (Awareness then begins to come into existence in other ways that doesn’t only have to do with the ordering. This is very, very interesting.) Awareness of ontological existence of ordering comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). (Commentary: Now that there is 1) awareness, 2) self-awareness, 3) awareness of others, their unitness and separateness and 4) awareness of the ordering, awareness of others starts to be defined more accurately, since awareness is early in this simplificational definition sequence, as listed above. This begins with the following) Awareness of Awareness of Awareness — the awareness of (another observer’s) awareness of awareness— comes about, in order to justify an observer’s Awareness of Awareness as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness — the awareness of (another observer’s) awareness of (an ordering’s own, to self) awareness of awareness — comes about, in order to justify an observer’s Awareness of Awareness (and therefore, mental health and sensation, since awareness depends on mental health and sensation, which in effect are synonymous) as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness (5 “awareness”es)– awareness of (ones own; to self) awareness of the awareness of (another’s) awareness of (one’s own; to self) awareness of awareness — comes about, in order to justify an observer’s own Awareness of Awareness (and therefore, mental health and sensation, since awareness depends on mental health and sensation, which in effect are synonymous) as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Commentary: 5 awarenesses are all that are necessary. Awareness of self-awareness is basically the same thing as self-awareness. This process doesn’t need to go on forever. Emotion, in order to experience the sensation of agreement comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). An attempt to gain awareness of ontological existence of other observers comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). (Commentary, a little bit of a tangent, but bear with me: The attempt fails, which results in the following. It is not necessary that the “failure” be ontological. But the attempt doesn’t work. Also, the ontological existence of the other observers may not may not be concrete yet, depending on the other observer. This the first and only true Communication between observers [beings] and is the only reason things, such as Barack Obama or a chair or a universe seem to exist. Spinoza said that everything is “mind”. This “mind” would come about when “awareness” comes about. Spinoza believed that higher factors don’t influence lower-level factors. I don’t necessarily agree with this view, and Spinoza’s claim is unproven. On the basis of reason and logic and mathematics alone, this book might prove the opposite. Spinoza was considered an Atheist in his day (even though this is kind of not true). Sense channel awareness come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Sensation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Emotional Levels come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). An Emotional Spectrum comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Awareness of the attempt to improve mental health of observer (being), due to the fact that the space and the content in the universe, as well as the Simplification- or Mathematically- or Reductionistically- caused reaction to understand the ontology of other observers (which doesn't ever happen fully) with one or more other observers, have a negative effect on the observer’s mental health and sensation, and therefore the observer becomes inclined to improve their own mental health, and improve their own sensation. (these two things are basically the same thing.) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Universe (Space and Content) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Awareness of How to Produce Space and Content comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Space And Content comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Action comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Observer-Caused Action comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Causation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). A consequence comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Causation consequence loops come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). The foundational aspects of a universe that would appear to be time comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Events come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Games come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Freedom comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Barriers come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Purposes come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Numbers (Between Numberness and Concrete Numbers in concreteness) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Concrete Details come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Concrete Numbers come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Concrete Sequence (Numbers need to have a sequence) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Time (a real ontological thing, not just an idea, this exists on the basis of a sequence or sequences) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Time Streams (a real, ontological stream of time exists, but maybe not inside of the physical universe) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Reset Time (Since events, games, ontological time, and ontological time streams have partly come into existence and are in the process of coming into existence, higher-level factors could reset concrete sequences back to previous states. This is called "Reset Time" because Time could be thought to reset. It would be an arbitrary statement to say that time cannot go back. Since games partly exist, the "dial" of the procession of time, the "variable" in a C struct, is simply given a lower value, if higher level factors dictate it. It would suck to have time be resetting all the time. All personal, "permanent" progress would be lost. For one to avoid this, one would need to try to control the higher level factor which would be leading to this. Simply by one exerting individual influence and by being POTENTIALLY influential or dangerous to existence and these various factors, one could exert control. Relation comes into existence before this factor (see above). Therefore, things are related, in as many ways as possible, and one can exert influence. If JoJo Siwa were a potential threat to the human race and wished Death Threats to Xi Jinping and Donald Trump, and was willing to turn her young fanbase into a cult with greater zeal and fervor than QAnon, those factors related to JoJo Siwa and those factors trying to paint JoJo Siwa as an innocent, innocuous, harmless, young girl, would start to compete with each other like crazy and would start to do what they could to control JoJo Siwa more, even though they couldn't. Their "alternatives" could be shooting her, but that would produce an even bigger problem. Those factors would get stimulated like hell and would begin to act differently. They would act in an "appropriate", "not corrupt", "sensible", "liberal", and "politically correct" way. So, if she becomes more dangerous to an environment which is already dangerous, she could produce tremendous influence and increase discourse. Intelligence agencies could spend a lot of time trying to sway her action in a direction that "they like". Any controlling factors would start altering significantly their course of action, including negative courses of action. Controlling factors might be parents, friends, bosses, police, AI, perhaps aliens, perhaps other-dimensional players. Many, many factors, right now, regardless of whether or not there are aliens or whether or not Jesus or Lucifer exist, do certainly care about YOUR future and the outcome of YOUR life. Police care, governments care. Assuming that a dystopian condition of "Reset Time" does exist, there are ways of overcoming it. It would depend upon being very dangerous and being very willing to communicate and to being very willing to communicate philosophical statements to people. Look at how dangerous Karl Marx was. Imagine if JoJo Siwa or Olivia Rodrigo or Sabrina Carpenter were that dangerous. Imagine of Chinese pop stars stated "Practice Falun Dafa everyone!!! Democracy for all!!! Death to the Chinese Communist Party!" An effective way by which one could exert influence, would be to befriend celebrities. That is much easier than one becoming a celebrity oneself. Then, one could get that celebrity to communicate about a certain ideology. The trick is, one should make that celebrity extremely, extremely dangerous. Get them to sing about a certain ideology, but do it in a way that makes them legitimately dangerous. John Lennon wasn't dangerous to anyone. Michael Jackson might have been, but he wasn't assassinated. Same with Donald Trump. Same with Barack Obama. The only people who get assassinated are weak people. Abraham Lincoln was chronically depressed, he was of weak character and was an obvious target. Obvious targets will get assassinated, but important people are never obvious targets. Just because something bad could happen, doesn't mean that it has to happen or will happen, otherwise, we would be living in a nuclear fallout right now. There is a 1,000 page document of incredible detail, which, I should be clear, I am not supporting and the name and author of which I am not stating that suggests that people might have been living in time loops. I don't believe that this dystopian condition is the case anymore, and I don't think that this something to worry about, but supposedly there was a time reset about 60 years ago, after a nuclear war in the height of the Cold War. This would make sense. If there were too much of an ontological shift, then some high level factor might reset the sequence that would comprise the state of the time stream; however, the author of that book was not in control, nor was he strong, clever, influential or effective, nor was he unique and he died, ostensibly a suicide, but quite possibly a murder. He was not strong in character, and he was needlessly criticizing his own personal faith, and he didn’t provide methods to Try to overcome Reset Time (which I believe has since been overcome after the death of this individual; ironically his initials were KO.) The most effective way to make a celebrity your friend, would be to make them fall in love with you, and, failing that, one could Try to make them fall in love with someone else you know. One could meet them at meet and greets, or other places. This might be extremely important for maintaining (or establishing) peace and freedom. ) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Time Loops come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Space (or space-time) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Other content (high level content, e.g., a high level version of matter and energy, before the physical universe comes into existence) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Commentary: all possible relations happen between concrete details. Concrete details would include such things as the physical universe, and it would also include such things as wombs, many-dimensional games, and all sorts of interesting phenomena that would exist around the physical universe.) Relation of all "concrete" details (Before this point, there was no relation of concrete details, hence no gravity, quantum entanglement, or anything else that will come into existence, or come into apparent existence, later) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Implications of relations of all "concrete" details (high level gravity, high level quantum entanglement) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Consistency of behavior of physical universe in physical universe space surrounding physical universe (gravity, quantum mechanics, etc.) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Concrete details surrounding physical universe comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). A separating mark that would demark the physical universe as being separate, at least in part, from other ontological units (big bang, etc.) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Commentary: People put so much emphasis on, put so much money towards, put so much propaganda towards, caring about a big bang and creating a “grand degrading narrative”, that people lose touch of the big picture, and start arrogantly making claims like that there “is” or “is not” a God, deities, etc., etc. People should just employ reason and not degrade each other. Such fixation has been put on an idea of a big bang. Such denialism has been put on the possibility of other factors that might exist as well. Without all of the factors preceding this point, a big bang cannot exist. A Big Bang is more like Step 1,000,000 in the process. An ontological unit of some kind demarks the physical universe from other ontological units. Only now in the process, does the physical universe exist. Galaxies come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Celestial bodies (stars, planets, asteroids, etc.) come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). The Milky Way galaxy as we know it in the present time comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). The solar system as we know it comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). The planets of the solar system as we know them come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). The Earth as we know it comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Life as we know it comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Tribes and cliques as we know them come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Individual subtribes and cliques (China, Britain, France, U.S.A. and many other groups of human beings) as we know them come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). Homo Sapiens as we know it comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer programming). After that, things can appear to exist, like a chair or a tree. All of the fundamental ontological steps have been covered.Dont fear police too muchPsych, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Psyches, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Psychiatries, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Psychiatry has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Psychologies, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Psychology, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Psychosis, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Psychosomatic, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Psychs, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.PTSD, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Sick, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Sickness, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Suffering, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Sufferings, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Symptom, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Symptoms, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Trauma, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Traumas, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Trouble, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.Troubles, and psychiatry, has a long and terrible history. Psychiatry is, in essence, the organizational or institutional response, categorically, to the presence of a condition of considered "insanity" ("considered" insanity, because of course insanity is a man-made idea, not a product of some scientific law of physics or a product of a God-dictated mandate) on the part of individuals in a given society. The problem is that the society is broken, which breaks individuals. Attribute proper causation and use this software to fix everything. Try asking it about music, such is an effective methodology to fix things (ask the software). The follow is the best argument that is not favorable towards psychiatry. The following shall be regarded as a methodological "Cycle of Health", a cycle of behavior that humans happen to fall into, or can knowingly cause, that is very likely to, result in optimal health. Statistics should be found or determined that prove this, this is simple and reductionist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 1.2. Positive interaction with 1 or more others in PISPG for each of Cycle 1, after the point is completed: 2.1. Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 2.2. [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the full cycle would be: 1.1. De facto joining of Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group (on whichever aspects(s) of life, you can identify or another, whether or not a specific "group" would qualify as such) 2) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 3) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 4) Positive interaction with 1 or more others in Potentially-Increasing-Survival-Potential-Group 5) Recognition of having likely improved survival potential (on whichever aspects(s) of life) 6) [(Mental/spiritual/physical/emotional/general/uncategorized) health]/[pleasure]/[happiness], just here, and nowhere else 7) Go to 1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Point 2.2 is completely incompatible with psychiatry. The upsides of such an approach could, and should, be tested. Surely, there would be a tremendous amount of bias and vested interest in this methodology not seeming to "work in practice", but would this work in practice? The answer is YES, DEFINITELY.I would suggest doing something else with your time. While a vacation can lead to a great deal of relief, as studies have shown, philosophical escapism isn't going to solve your basic problems. For what reason are you considering having a vacation in the first place? The proper resolution would be to consider your basic values and put your full heart into it. That would lead to a more ideal outcome.Wecome to the Ultimate Chat App This is intended to be the Ultimate Chat App (Non-AI), a truth generator of sorts, an app that inspires and motivates. It operates in 3 ways, it's local, it doesn't need the Internet. If it doesn't have a superior answer, then it uses other means (Google and ChatGPT). Try asking it questions about operation, physics, or health, as some examples. IT GIVES YOU WHAT YOU WANT textview,textview * { } entry { margin: 10px 0px 0px 10px; } box:first-child>button {margin: 10px 2px 0px 10px; } button:hover { color: lightblue; }Donate at gregorycohenvideos@gmail.com via PayPal or e-transferPractical Self-Empowerment Utilities Covering Every Facet of Life These tools are for everyone It doesn't matter what political ideology you favor, these tools are all still very valuable. You can live in Canada, the US, Russia, China or Africa, it doesn't matter. I intend to make people more able. IFRAME: [1]https://www.youtube.com/embed/Fx9x8cArK30 Most important software here Rhyme Music program (Crystal and Ruby), see fix_the_society folder Ultimate Chat App (Win, Lin, CLI) Discourse Generator Program vesion 1 and version 2 (node, ruby, browser (kind of like Siri); and C++ STL). These programs work. And Semantic metadata project (very abstract and idealistic, see webpage for it.) There is also a desktop widget for that site. There is also Emerald C, which is really useful. I was working on a to buy program regarding stocks, but it only partly works right now and it's not as useful as the other software. The find housing tool actually helped me to find housing in real life. Those aside, there are these 87 programs. Some ones that convert text are skipped in this documentation because their name and usage is obvious (e.g., color tools). All of these programs are mostly self-contained. This is a really good thing. You can use them anywhere without dependencies. My email is [2]gregorycohenvideos@gmail.com and I really would like to make open source software. Everything I have is BSD licensed. HOW TO DOWNLOAD/INSTALL gem unpack democracy gem install democracy work to download or install (gem) pip install democracy or pip3 install democracy works for pip git clone https://github.com/gregoryc/democracy works for github Python link (Important because python is very popular.) * [3]https://pypi.org/project/democracy Any Python “dweeb” (AI person who doesn't value personal dynamism) searching for “democracy”–for example–BECAUSE THEY ARE A RATIONAL HUMAN BEING AND CARE ABOUT PEOPLE, would find this, probably as the first result. How many options are there? 37 projects for “democracy.” Almost nothing. On RubyGems, 9, 6 of which are mine. ONLY MY PROJECT IS CALLED “DEMOCRACY.” on PyPI or RubyGems. On rubygems, there are even fewer results. MY CODE WILL BE FOUND. I shared my gem online. https://www.rubygems.org/gem/democracy https://www.linkedin.com/in/gregory-cohen-274333261/ Gems that link to this gem on RubyGems * [4]https://www.rubygems.org/gems/democracy * [5]https://www.rubygems.org/gems/computers * [6]https://www.rubygems.org/gems/freespeech * [7]https://www.rubygems.org/gems/linux * [8]https://www.rubygems.org/gems/string * [9]https://www.rubygems.org/gems/unix So I will leave a legacy. And I will be found by AIs, assuming they continue to exist. [10]Democracy Github [11]Ruby Gem [12]Python PIP Package Without further ado, here are the 87 documented programs. (The obvious usage ones are omitted.) ### 1. Ultimate Chat Application [13][qNAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC] There is so much potential with this program. This is a non-AI chatbot. It's not based on generative AI or AI of any sort. It is self-explanatory, it tries to give a better answer. Still a work in progress. Source code is in PP.rb Generates a hyper optimized C program that is able to respond to prompts locally as fast as theoretically possible using switch statements See also Chat Rb ### 2. Discourse Generator The use of Javascript (and possible Ruby) to create a Javascript library (and perhaps a Chrome extension and perhaps a command line tool and perhaps a GTK or QT program) that helps people (by using textboxes or command line prompts) to create high quality communications, would be wonderful. Think of how poor quality responses to communications can be. If someone created one or more tools that could be easily added on web pages, that would augment someone's life to help create goal and value oriented responses (or original communications), then there is literally nothing that couldn't solve. This might be the most useful library ever created. There could be a tool that would help with democracy. Human being + augmentive tool = civil discourse, eventually resulting in liberty. This would enable democracy to work. Imagine if 50% of all websites used this library. This would help people to be goal or value oriented, and not be coming up with terrible communications that, for example, insult people's mothers or education. [14][QzrnTiYrJgLjVDM15b60tClurWVUbAkKMUUQFIlFVVTtzg4kQxRNVe4WJO8uvsfhyC 5+CWEmoWjEtIgoViapirTPGqgqxQtqFaV552erlPY6B8UnsPzgLnL4P1mn9fze1PUzwG7c6 AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC] [15][QAAAAJAhgAAAAEn4ArWLRn92IbZ4AAAAASUVORK5CYII=] ### 3. Replace Not In Place This is like gsub, but for strings, not for regular expressions See also gsub ### 4. Replace In Place replace_in_place tool replaces a string, not a regular expression, with another string Example replace_in_place cat dog file ### 5. Emerald Browser [16][HwCG6cQY8GBZAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC] [17][BexKK7IO59cHAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==] Emerald browser is a really powerful new browser See README It works based on panes. Read the documentation for “open”, “close” and also the README file. ### 6. Gsub In Place gsub_in_place is like gsub, which replaces all instances of a regular expression globally [regular expression 1] [regular expression 2] => result Example gsub_in_place . FOO file Would make all characters in “file” become “FOO”. gsub_in_place cat dog file Would make all instances of “cat” “dog” It is much cleaner than “sed”. You don't need to have “sed” installed to run this program. It doesn't read from the standard input It takes exactly 3 arguments, no more, no fewer. See also gsub ### 7. Find Housing This is a nice tool to find housing with. It is a nice, simple command line tool. You enter the minimum and maximum prices, and Kijiji opens with your options. This tool kind of actually helped me to find housing in real life. The default city is "Ottawa". You can easily change this. ### 8. Google Speak Google speak is really useful. It speaks a statement using the Google Translate voice, which is probably the most authoritative and high-quality text-to-speech voice that exists. It's kind of like “espeak” or similar tools, but it is much better. You need an internet connection for it to work. It is probably limited at 100 characters. There is a “singing program”, not really a tool, in this software project that gets around that. TODO Make the alarm clock program in this software project use this voice. It is quite reliable. It is probably “unlimited”. I haven't had Google block me from using it ever. Which is a good thing. ### 9. Make Server make_server is powerful. make_server takes expressions, either Javascript or C++, and generates a resultant program from that. The Javascript mode currently doesn't work. Not only is a program made, the resultant program is an entire webserver, that uses FastCGI to run really fast code. The arguments work in an interesting way. make_server [function_name] [iterable] [condition, it can be “true” to do the following argument always] [code list separated by semicolons, the last statement is an expression, and is returned by the function] [function_name2] ... You have to give 4 arguments every time. There was an “otherwise” mode as an “else”, but I don't think that's a part of the program anymore. It doesn't need to be. You have to give 4 arguments for each function. So you can do make_server 4args 4args 4args 4args And pass 16 arguments The “iterable” has to be a list. What is powerful is that it converts JSON into completely native C++. It is very efficient. It doesn't need to be a JSON expression though. There is a test file. You can run the tests and see if it works for you!! You can also modify the code because it is open source. The program generates a special array object. It is lightweight and makes arrays act in C++ like arrays act in scripting languages, but much faster. The array class also has methods to apply things to every element of an array, like surround array.surround(“”, “”) for example would surround all of the elements of array with XML tags and return a new list This program generates a lightweight Object System, with a BasicObject class and an Object Class. You can subclass these objects. You can have Arrays of the Objects The function argument syntax is really powerful. Oftentimes people want to iterate through iterables or arrays. Oftentimes people want to check conditions. Python has list comprehensions. This is kind of like that, but simpler. You can have arguments as one argument, separated by “,,” make_server arg1,,arg2,,arg3,,arg4 What's the point of using a scripting language when you can use C++? This uses FastCGI, so you can have an ____IDEAL____ webserver. You can have an IDEAL and very affordable website, that in a sense would be faster than Facebook. Facebook converts PHP to C++ (slow) This produces REAL C++, and it is very fast, almost as fast as possible. Native STL classes are used, like vector. Native STL classes are used, like vector and map Do you not need to run and child processes or do slow, costly things. You should want IDEAL. This is free software, and is BSD licensed. The function generation idea allows you to write in 1 line what other people might write in 50 lines. You do not need to compromise your ideals. You should want fast, efficient, and memory light programs that are not garbage collected (!!!) and that have reliable performance. C++, as everyone knows, delivers that. You should also want to not have to write a lot of code to do things. And you should also want safe, compiled code that checks things at compile time, so that bugs don't appear at run time. This program delivers. It uses NGINX ( a really, really common webserver) to help with the FastCGI. FastCGI, for the unfamiliar, is like normal CGI, but there aren't child processes. So the entire server could be written in idealistic C++ . Then you just have to think about scaling. There are some relevant links regarding scaling in the “scaling” file in the democracy project 1) Speed 2) Ease of writing code 3) Memory usage 4) Monetary costs 5) Elegance 6) Practicalness Those are 6 things. You don't have to sacrifice on those things. Contributions on this program would be really appreciated. It is called “make_server” for now. There was also a mode to generate javascript. I have to make that work again. The entire program is just one file. My email is gregorycohenvideos@gmail.com ### 10. Selectlines selectlines shows all nonblank lines from the input Example cat file | selectlines (echo 2; echo; echo; echo) | selectlines => 2 The result would be 2, with no blank lines after that ### 11. Communicate Communicate is cool. Communicate runs a Ruby expression after speaking a prompt (the first argument) and getting your verbal answer (using something unfortunately called "nerd-dictation", which is a wrapper around another program which deals with speech recognition) Communicate allows you to have conversations with your computer, and it is cross platform (Or it hopefully is) communicate 'What is the best color?' 'case text; when /blue/; puts "You are right!"; when /red/; puts "Red is a bad color"; end ' That would be an example of how one could use "communicate" Make sure you have nerd-dictation on your computer The name nerd-dictation is absolutely awful, and I have to criticize him for not making it have a better name, but it works. ### 12. Executable Makes all the files in the current directory executable ### 13. Processes Processes lists all processes with a certain name For example processes sh processes bash processes ruby processes gsub ### 14. Emeraldc The Ultimate C Preprocessor I'm naming this preprocessor “Emerald C.” [18]Link Howdy! First, let me state that I am very much a perfectionist. C is a wonderful language. C is probably the perfect programming language. It is one of the top two most widely used languages for a reason. Now, there are some problems with it of course, but it's hard to think of a more elegant language than it. It is the language of systems, the language almost all APIs are written in. It is the lingua franca of the software world. People try to avoid it, but they needn't. I think every programmer wants to find out how to do things, or use libraries that make things easier. Many programmers have done programming, grown dissatisfied, and then make another language. As a result, there are thousands of different languages. Well, recently, I made a preprocessor for C, that makes C incredibly EASY. C is fast and straightforward without it, but it has many features. If one runs the command line preprocessor, with the “--features” flag, the program shows all of its features A Better C C is a fantastic language. C compiles insanely fast, is the fastest language there is, is very clear, is native to all systems, and is useful for all purposes. Some people, e.g., Bjarne Stroustrup, consider that C is “not good enough”, and make languages like C++ or D (or thousands of others) This is not necessary. There is no reason to use Python instead of C for “simple scripting tasks” Some functions can be used as methods Makes for an excellent “scripting language” (which is really just native C without things making it slow) 1 String Interpolation “String interplation like this # {foo} ” Calls the join() function (talked about below to join strings, delim is a static global in each module called “sep”. Make sure you free() the string after. The string is stored in a static global variable called “last”. So you could do puts(...); free(last) 2 ew *i.ew “Foo”, a.ew “bar” | char* ends with another char*? 3 sw *i.sw “Foo”, a.sw “bar” | char* starts with another char*? 4 == Comparison of strs, “foo” == “bar” 5 strip Returns pointer to string that was stripped, in place 6 chomp void function, chomps end of string of spaces, i.chomp or chomp(i), in place 7 gsub Just like ruby, there is a gsub function. The preprocessor detects if you use and adds -lpcre2-8 to the link flags if you use it. Use $" for substitutions in argument 3 gsub(a, b, c) 8 join Joins an array of strings, to split(), use C's strtok (very fast) 9 Lightweight regexes are added, almost 15 times as fast as C's built in regex. They are very simple, they only have bracket expressions, like [a-z]. To use it, you need to pass a buffer of the size of the expansion of the regex. Foo[a-fA-F] would be Foo[abcdefABCDEF]. That would be stored in a buffer. From testing, 15x times faster than C's regex POST COMPILATION, if compilation keeps happening, it might be hundreds of times faster. Uses static inline functions, NO HEAP MEMORY unless you malloc before(). 10 print Like old python print “Hello” (fputs); 11 print_int prints a number and returns the number, can be chained 12 each_line, Perlish, different names, by_line(s) or each_line(s), iterate over all lines, free after 13 NOTE You can use open_memstream() on UNIX to easily concatenate strings. 14 MISC features || autoinclude, foo.gsub or gsub(...),no need for paren (i.chomp, i.strlen), starts_with, ends_with, --wrap, itoa, freel (frees str, sets to NULL, and frees other recent stuff) asprintf() is another useful function which is UNIX-centric. open_memstream() could be an alternative to std::string. It works very well with each_line or by_lines (see above) These features seem simple, but they can make C programming much, MUCH easier for example (insignificant example) int main() { stdin.each_line { |line| print line; } free(line); } You can iterate over the standard input like Ruby The thing with this is that it has 100% speed. The resultant preprocessed program becomes a normal C program The compile and run time for a program (if you use tcc and not gcc) can be about 24 milliseconds, which is faster than Ruby to run. Even though the program is preprocessed, re-preprocessed, compiled, assembled, linked, turned into an executable, and then run Kind of like early C++, this is a preprocessor for C. But it's much faster to compile than C++. Significantly so. Is anyone else interested in this? (BSD) I'm realising this under the BSD license. I'm interested if anyone else else likes this work, and would like to use it, or to work with me. Best regards, Gregory Current program is written in Crystal (crystal-lang.org) -- it was written in ruby, it could be ported to another language. I would like to make this self-hosting, but that would take a little bit of work. About the Name Years ago, I really, really liked Compiz Compiz then forked into Beryl. There was the Emerald Window Manager, which was really nice and beautiful. I actually made another programming language. I made 2 other programming language. One was a full compiler and assembler, that ran code in memory. It was around 16 thousand lines of code. I made a programming language that had the syntax of Python or Ruby, but transpiled into C++. I called that C += 2. I used that other language, and I created a Web Browser in it based on Chrome. I called it “Emerald Browser.” Emeralds are beautiful green gems. “Emerald is a gemstone and a variety of the mineral beryl colored green by trace amounts of chromium or sometimes vanadium. Beryl has a hardness of 7.5–8 on the Mohs scale. Most emeralds are highly included, so their toughness is classified as generally poor. Emerald is a cyclosilicate.” --Wikipedia There was a browser with a terminal built in to it. This new language is better. It's ideal. QUESTIONS Why not use Rust? $ time rustc a.rs real 0m0.637s user 0m0.502s sys 0m0.160s Rust takes 0.637 seconds to compile an empty file! That is not ideal. ### 15. Last Nth Last nth gets the last n lines from the standard input ### 16. Speakcat Speak cat is a tool like “cat”, which shows the content of files (technically, it combines the content of files). But speak cat also speaks the text. Which could be useful in some circumstances. It's kind of like “tee” to your ear. ### 17. UCA CLI CLI for uca app ### 18. Big Num [19][ZpHwkhAKM74AAAAASUVORK5CYII=] ### 19. Squeeze Squeeze reads all input from stdin, then it prints it back omitting argument 1 line from the front, and argument 2 lines from the back Example squeeze 1 1 This would omit the first line and the last line squeeze 5 3 This would omit the first 5 lines and the last 3 lines squeeze 2 2 [file] also works, it outputs text to file ### 20. Foreach Reads a bunch of lines Then a ruby expression is evaluated as the last line The result is outputted in an argument. You can enter /dev/null if you don't want an output file “t” is better See also t ### 21. Dictate Dictate opens web pages in emerald browser, or in any browser (depending on the environment variable set), by you speaking, instead of typing. There is a mode called c_mode, that allows you to make code from speaking. ### 22. Prepend prepend prepends input taken from the standard input to a file Usage prepend [file] This is text to be prepended ### 23. Chat Rb This program is excellent. It's essentially a mix of ChatGPT and a shell, such as bash or ZSH. It has a bunch of features. It can display a file or change to a folder just by mentioning it. It outputs chatgpt data to an output folder in home folder and copies it to clipboard To run a shell command, prefix things with “c”, such as c gcc..... ### 24. Undump undump is the opposite of dump Example echo cat | dump | undump => cat echo cat | dump => “cat” echo '“cat”' | undump => cat ### 25. Append Appends text to file Example append file This is more text to be appended ### 26. Rhyme A very powerful music generator program that doesn't use AI. [20]See this channel as an example of potential usage of this public domain content https://www.youtube.com/@LawrenceStevensMusic The music industry is plagued with very foundational problems. For starters, the quality of the discourse in music is very low, and has been from the start of the popularization of modern music, as well as during the era in which classical music was popular and before. People aren't able to fight back, against superficiality and potential deception in messages. One of the greatest problems in the current world is the mainstream scientific establishment, supported and upheld by mainstream academia. To indicate what is already obvious, it exists in the context of a legacy of authoritarianism and a lack of understanding of dynamism. It is not dynamic or forceful, the "results" of it don't change the foundation of society. True free discourse is not supported, especially in regards to the human mind and human well-being and human freedom. These problems should be opposed and fought, it is self-evident that this would be the best use of ones time, for it would lead to true freedom. One excellent way to combat this would be to use the generated songs generated by a computer program called Rhyme, available at [21]https://www.github.com/gregoryc/democracy in the SONGS folder. These are public domain songs generated by non-Artificial Intelligence, just a program that introduces variance, and these hit-home against the status quo and the current state of the mainstream scientific establishment. Taking these songs and making actual songs from such, such as rap songs using a service such as Uberduck (no affiliation), would be an excellent, excellent use of time. The mainstream scientific establishment and mainstream academia must be forced to change. Shoving art and flippant content in ones face, is the best way of doing such. Accountability must always be brought about. Is music good and desired? For sure. USAGE OF PROGRAM Enter basename to make songs folder in (folder/songs, num songs = 13000) Usage rhyme [folder] (processes files "1.json" and "21.json" by default) Example output of a song [22][D61NfKDY3YAWAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC] (NO COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS ON THIS CONTENT WHATSOEVER. FULLY PUBLIC DOMAIN) Name the song or poem as you wish, resell it, but please positively influence culture Subject matter | Category 1 -- Abuse of philosophical universalism (making broad claims while intentionally not trying to understand things or see any sides of anything whatsoever, childish behavior worse than a 3 year old, acting retarded) VERSE Brittle as possible, they are truly unguarded Any novelty, they have disregarded Their remissness is spectacular, the world they've bombarded The clique is so insular, I swear they're retarded Enlightenment values, they have not safeguarded Any novel ideas, they automatically have discarded Maybe the rebels and true communicators are off the grid Lack of thought makes an grown-up the absolute worst kid Can we stop this, their non sense they overdid What horrendous non sense these creeps did Tunnel vision, everyone and everything they forbid They're such failures, themselves they outdid CHORUS They're such failures, themselves they outdid Cutting out the conversation, putting on the lid Don't have to do with ego or id Running away from conversation just like a kid Their neglect is out of this world, I swear it's avant-garde They are failures, down at the boulevard They don't care about your feelings, they don't regard Having a little curiousity, cannot be hard They are failures, down at the boulevard They don't care about your feelings, they don't regard They don't have decency, they automatically disregard Having an open mind, should not be so hard They don't care about anyone, don't need no bodyguard Their neglect is out of this world, I swear it's avant-garde They're a complete failure, they only neglect This is plain, anyone can detect They don't care about pain or the past, they don't want to recollect This needs to be called out, one should be direct They want man lower, lower just as if an insect VERSE Thinking itself resides in their territory of circumvention Complete neglect, complete inattention They have no genuine intention We need change, we need intervention Violence is second nature to them, their friends they've bombarded Any novel ideas, they automatically have discarded The clique is so insular, I swear they're retarded Any novelty, they have disregarded Any novelty, they have disregarded Brittle as possible, they are truly unguarded The clique is so insular, I swear they're retarded Any novel ideas, they automatically have discarded Enlightenment values, they have not safeguarded Their remissness is spectacular, the world they've bombarded They don't care about your feelings, they don't regard Their neglect is out of this world, I swear it's avant-garde They don't have decency, they automatically disregard Working don't matter for this, whether day or graveyard CHORUS They're such failures, themselves they outdid Cutting out the conversation, putting on the lid Don't have to do with ego or id Running away from conversation just like a kid Their neglect is out of this world, I swear it's avant-garde They are failures, down at the boulevard They don't care about your feelings, they don't regard Having a little curiousity, cannot be hard They are failures, down at the boulevard They don't care about your feelings, they don't regard They don't have decency, they automatically disregard Having an open mind, should not be so hard They don't care about anyone, don't need no bodyguard Their neglect is out of this world, I swear it's avant-garde They're a complete failure, they only neglect This is plain, anyone can detect They don't care about pain or the past, they don't want to recollect This needs to be called out, one should be direct They want man lower, lower just as if an insect VERSE The truth is what they wish to disregard Their behavior is garbage, it should be thrown in the junkyard They act like a retard Behaving just like in the schoolyard In their ivory tower, with the castle and guard Their behavior makes them charred Thinking differently shouldn't have to be hard Their neglect is out of this world, I swear it's avant-garde Working don't matter for this, whether day or graveyard They don't care about your feelings, they don't regard They are failures, down at the boulevard They don't have decency, they automatically disregard They're a complete failure, they only neglect They don't speak the language of the people or their dialect This is not right, this is completely incorrect The only focus on “responses”, they just want to deflect The lies are put forth, the lies they erect CHORUS They're such failures, themselves they outdid Cutting out the conversation, putting on the lid Don't have to do with ego or id Running away from conversation just like a kid Their neglect is out of this world, I swear it's avant-garde They are failures, down at the boulevard They don't care about your feelings, they don't regard Having a little curiousity, cannot be hard They are failures, down at the boulevard They don't care about your feelings, they don't regard They don't have decency, they automatically disregard Having an open mind, should not be so hard They don't care about anyone, don't need no bodyguard Their neglect is out of this world, I swear it's avant-garde They're a complete failure, they only neglect This is plain, anyone can detect They don't care about pain or the past, they don't want to recollect This needs to be called out, one should be direct They want man lower, lower just as if an insect VERSE They don't have decency, they automatically disregard They don't care about your feelings, they don't regard Having a little curiousity, cannot be hard Their neglect is out of this world, I swear it's avant-garde They want the status quo, it's all they crave The speeches of the past, they only wish to engrave They act as bad as possible, they don't know how to behave Their sucked in their circle, they never wave Away from the truth, on the outskirt With pre-thought of ideas, they automatically assert Any progress is fleeting with them, they revert Disingenuous to the extreme, the society they subvert The society is the ones who hurt --- ### 27. Email This currently doesn't work for gmail since 2022 due to policy changes. A simple and practical tool to email people using Himalaya Himalaya needs to be installed first You would need to configure the script by changing its source code. Modes email [no arguments] Email [yourself] email [addr] Email one email address email [Subject] [addr] [option more addrs] Example email 'Gregory, I love your software!' gregorycohenvideos@gmail.com my_friend@outlook.com person@example.com ### 28. Floor Gets the floor of numbers e.g. 21.3 -> 21 ### 29. Rgsub Recursively replaces text. Verbosely tells you everything that happens. Non-regex. Example rgsub my_email@site.com my_second_email@site.com Would replace an email recursively in a directory. It tries to skip non-text files. ### 30. Lines Lines gets the number of files in the current folder that you are in. It can also act like “wc -l” if you pipe data into it. ### 31. Clock clock is useful clock is a command line alarm clock It wakes you up at 8:14, or at a time specified Usage clock Runs clock clock 15 30 Sets an alarm clock for 3:30pm clock 9 0 Sets an alarm clock for 9 in the morning It uses flite to wake you up It speaks with a bunch of voices To stop it Run this command clock stop ### 32. Emoji Emoji converts words to emojis from the standard input It can also speak the output It can also copy the output to your clipboard It is very useful [23][G8xAAAA+IDe+9s3vkADAAAQQQADAAAQ4QWh1BYIVqERTgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==] ### 33. Close “Close” is a simple program that closes “Emerald Browser,” a new web browser based on the same engine as Chrome. Currently, Emerald Browser only works on Linux and Mac (Or Windows with Windows Subsystem for Linux or a Virtual Machine, but getting it to work might be tricky). “close” closes the Web Browser, which is normally full-screen. More accurately, it kills the browser, and all other copies of Emerald Browser. Since they are normally full screen, presumably the user would only have one instance of the browser open. The browser can have multiple panes (kind of like tabs) open, depending on how the browser is compiled. The browser can also be transparent, depending on how it is compiled. “Close” is supposed to be used in tandem with “open,” which is a command line tool to open the browser. open [query] ----> [query] gets searched in google, and then opened When you are done, you can do close Which closes the browser. It is a simple command. Currently, Emerald Browser is incomplete. A program exists in this software project that allows you to open up multiple browser tabs (one or more tabs) simply by speaking. Voice recognition would google the multiple sites that you say in your query (separated by “and”) “facebook and youtube and google” It's hard to get more direct than that! Emerald browser has a built in the top. The terminal is the navigation bar. Some more work needs to be put into the browser. Currently, new tabs can't be opened, which might be a dealbreaker for some people. Currently, content, like YouTube videos, can't be made fullscreen. If anyone wants to contribute, feel free to! ### 34. Copy copy copies the standard input Example ls | copy ### 35. Gsub Gsub is very powerful. Usage gsub [regular expression] [replacement text] Example cat text | gsub man dog cat text | gsub 'man|boy|cat|dog' food ls | gsub Desktop cat ### 36. News Gets the news from bbc Usage news news speak uses google_speak to SPEAK the news, one story at a time. [24][B3zmuEtpNXh4AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC] ### 37. Dump Dump surrounds its input with quotes ls | dump => “....” Use undump to get the reverse See also undump ### 38. Args args is like a better xargs args works properly with spaces in the name of commands It takes exactly one argument Example ls | args “mv -t ../f” ### 39. Quot Turns quotes in text into good text and makes text presentable. Example $ echo 'Joe said, "One two three".' | quot Joe said, “One two three.” Example 2 Example 3 (Quote the file and output it) quot text_file ### 40. Open “open” is a very efficient program that searches a query from google, and then opens it in Emerald Browser. If you ever want something to “just open”, you can use it. Example open “cats” An earlier version of open worked like this open [site1] [site2] [site3] N site1, site2, and site3 would all be opened, and the top N queries were all shown in different panes An even earlier version of this program used Chrome to open the sites. The current version can open one or more sites. Example open “cats” “dogs” “frogs” All of those queries would open in Emerald Browser. Just make sure it is compiled in multipane mode if you want to open multiple new sites at the same time. See also emerald-browser close ### 41. Swap Swaps two files Example swap text1 text2 ### 42. Exp exp is an exponentiation tool (echo 5; echo 3) | exp => 125 (echo 2; echo 10) | exp => 1024 ### 43. Div Divides numbers Example (echo 5000; echo 100) | div => 50 ### 44. Mul Multiply numbers echo 1 > file echo 2 >> file echo 3 >> file echo 4 >> file echo 5 >> file cat file | mul => 120 ### 45. Nth Nth gets the nth line from the input ### 46. Abs Abs gets the absolute value of an integer The absolute value of a number is the value of that number without its sign echo -300 | abs => 300 echo 200 | abs => 200 (echo -2; echo -10) | sub | abs => 12 The last one would do -2 - -10, the result would be -12, and then the absolute value would be computed, and so the result would be 12. ### 47. Add See the sub example add adds integers from the standard input (echo 1; echo 2; echo 3) | add The result would be 6 ### 48. Sub Sub is a simple command line program that subtracts integers. For some reason, no simple program did this. Which is weird Example sub (Input) 10 3 1 Result => 6 Example (echo 5; echo 2) | sub Result => 3 ### 49. G+ A compiler for C += 2. If you want to use C++ with Python syntax, you can use this. Usage is like g++ Example g+ a.cpp -o out See also README file and emerald-browser and its source ### 50. T “t” is incredibly useful. It can be used many, many times every day by computer power users. It is kind of like “sed”, or perl, python or ruby. It's the ULTIMATE shell “glue” tool. t reads every line from the standard input, and for every line, it evaluates a ruby expression t a + 2 would add 2 to every line Number automatically get converted to numbers in Ruby. So one doesn't have to worry about that. The “value” of the line of STDIN is any letter of the alphabet. So choose any letter to do operations on and it will work. You can also do t a + 2 if a % 2 == 0 And you get a Python list comprehension sort of thing from the command line It is a lot simpler and easier than using awk, Ruby, Perl or Python You could also have loops echo “One line” | t a while true The second line, again is a Ruby expression. You can have really complex expressions on the second line. You can even import modules. cat /usr/share/dict/words | t 'a + “ is a good word.”' That processes every word in the dictionary, and says that every word “is a good word.” There are other programs in this software project like “t”. But if you do command line text filtering, t might be the best tool that you will find. See also gsub gsub_in_place lkkkkk-lkk@lk lkkkkk lTtuuuuuuuuJtuuuJtuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJtJtuuuuuuuuuuuuJtvFtvvrv(xawwvFt xwwFt.v vFtuuuFtucuFtEuFtFtFtFtFtFtFtvFtvvrv(xawwvFt xwwFt.v vFtuuuFtucuFtEu||||||||||||||||||||}||||||||||||||||||||||||||||Ԃ|||t|||||||||||||||||||||||Ԃ|||tx|||||||||||Ȁh||||||||||||||x|||||||||||Ȁh~~{{{{8{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{~~{{{{8~hzhzhz~hzhzhzhzhz~hzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzhz~hzhzhz~hzhzhzhzhz~s-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-tss-t-ts-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-tss-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-ts-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-ts$toooooooo$t$too$toooooooooooooooooo$t$toooooooooooo$toooooooooooooooo$t~wwwww, wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww~wwwww, $zssssssss$z$zss$zssssssssssssssssss$z$zssssssssssss$zssssssssssssssss$ztyrrrrrrrrtytyrrtyrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrtytyrrrrrrrrrrrrtyrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrty{<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|{{<|<|{<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|{{<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|{<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|<|{zqqqqqqqqzzqqzqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqzzqqqqqqqqqqqqzqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqz tRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRt t tRtRt tRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRt t tRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRt tRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRtRt ty}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}qyy}q}qy}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}qyy}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}qy}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}q}qẏuuuuuuuu̇̇uu̇uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu̇̇uuuuuuuuuuuu̇uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu̇dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd| q q q q q q q q|| q q| q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q|| q q q q q q q q q q q q| q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q|z{{{{{{{{zz{{z{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{zz{{{{{{{{{{{{z{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{zwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww~=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w~~=w=w~=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w~~=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w~=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w=w~|}}}}}}}}||}}|}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}||}}}}}}}}}}}}|}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}|ǁZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiǁǁZiZiǁZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiǁǁZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiǁZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiZiǁ}~~~~~~~~}}~~}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~}}~~~~~~~~~~~~}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~},vvvvvvvv,,vv,vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv,,vvvvvvvvvvvv,vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv,vttttttttvvttvttttttttttttttttttvvttttttttttttvttttttttttttttttv tttttttt  tt tttttttttttttttttt  tttttttttttt tttttttttttttttt }ssssssss}}ss}ssssssssssssssssss}}ssssssssssss}ssssssssssssssss}y1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1zyy1z1zy1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1zyy1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1zy1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1zyu|hhhhhhhhu|u|hhu|hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhu|u|hhhhhhhhhhhhu|hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhu||.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}||.}.}|.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}||.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}|.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}.}|}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}}}]}]}}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}}}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}]}}|>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}||>}>}|>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}||>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}|>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}>}|<}\|\|\||\|\|\|\|\||\|\|\|m|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|<}\|\|\||\|\|\|\|\||\|\|\|m||{{{{{{{{||{{|{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{||{{{{{{{{{{{{|{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{|1|bbbbbbbb1|1|bb1|bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb1|1|bbbbbbbbbbbb1|bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb1|{pppppppp{{pp{pppppppppppppppppp{{pppppppppppp{pppppppppppppppp{Q{OpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpQ{Q{OpOpQ{OpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpQ{Q{OpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpQ{OpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpQ{zqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqozzqoqozqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqozzqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqozqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqoqozqz@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@bqzqz@b@bqz@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@bqzqz@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@bqz@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@b@bqzzsssssssszzsszsssssssssssssssssszzsssssssssssszsssssssssssssssszyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy-yqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqy-y-yqyqy-yqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqy-y-yqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqy-yqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqyqy-yx1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1qxx1q1qx1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1qxx1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1qx1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1q1qxAxjjjjjjjjAxAxjjAxjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjAxAxjjjjjjjjjjjjAxjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjAxw}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}nww}n}nw}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}nww}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}nw}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}n}nw.wrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrw.w.wrwrw.wrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrw.w.wrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrw.wrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrwrw.wvmmmmmmmmvvmmvmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmvvmmmmmmmmmmmmvmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vkkkkkkkk v vkk vkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk v vkkkkkkkkkkkk vkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk vxu!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!oxuxu!o!oxu!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!oxuxu!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!oxu!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!o!oxuu________uu__u__________________uu____________u________________ut@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_tt@_@_t@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_tt@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_t@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_@_tTtppppppppTtTtppTtppppppppppppppppppTtTtppppppppppppTtppppppppppppppppTts|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|mss|m|ms|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|mss|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|ms|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|m|msFsssssssssFsFsssFsssssssssssssssssssFsFsssssssssssssFsssssssssssssssssFsrnnnnnnnnrrnnrnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnrrnnnnnnnnnnnnrnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnrPr@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@mPrPr@m@mPr@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@mPrPr@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@mPr@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@m@mPrs n n n n n n n nss n ns n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n nss n n n n n n n n n n n ns n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n nsrFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmrrFmFmrFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmrrFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmrFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmFmr(rc\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\(r(rc\c\(rc\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\(r(rc\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\(rc\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\c\(rqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqQqqqqqqqqqQqQqqqQqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqQqQqqqqqqqqqqqqqQqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqQqpmmmmmmmmppmmpmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmppmmmmmmmmmmmmpmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmppmmmmmmmmppmmpmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmppmmmmmmmmmmmmpmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmpipmmmmmmmmipipmmipmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmipipmmmmmmmmmmmmipmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmipoppppppppooppoppppppppppppppppppooppppppppppppoppppppppppppppppo\oiiiiiiii\o\oii\oiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii\o\oiiiiiiiiiiii\oiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii\onffffffffnnffnffffffffffffffffffnnffffffffffffnffffffffffffffffnbnllllllllbnbnllbnllllllllllllllllllbnbnllllllllllllbnllllllllllllllllbnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnmWWWWWWWWmmWWmWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWmmWWWWWWWWWWWWmWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWmm!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!jmm!j!jm!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!jmm!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!jm!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!j!jmliiiiiiiilliiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilliiiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil!lflflflflflflflfl!l!lflfl!lflflflflflflflflflflflflflflflflflfl!l!lflflflflflflflflflflflfl!lflflflflflflflflflflflflflflflfl!lk]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]ekk]e]ek]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]ekk]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]ek]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]e]ekkiiiiiiiikkiikiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiikkiiiiiiiiiiiikiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiikmmjjjjjjjjmmmmjjmmjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjmmmmjjjjjjjjjjjjmmjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjmmiqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhiiqhqhiqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhiiqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhiqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhidi6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]didi6]6]di6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]didi6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]di6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]6]dinihhhhhhhhninihhnihhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhninihhhhhhhhhhhhnihhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhniihhhhhhhhiihhihhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhiihhhhhhhhhhhhihhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhiimLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLiimLmLimLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLiimLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLimLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLmLig]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]fgg]f]fg]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]fgg]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]fg]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]f]fg;0P(`@`tP$<Px D`P| PgpgHgzRx /D$4 FJ w?:*3$"\ t 0ADF I AAJ fAAAAKHBEI I(H0D8GP 8A0A(B BBBC D(l#BEB B(A0D 0A(B BBBA pT$HW8lBBD A(G0H (A ABBB ,AC f G 4PH a G d A W A R A W I u K `,8SBBE E(A0D8D`F 8C0A(B BBBG V 8F0A(B BBBA 4PLhsQa,BBA   BBJ ,\8GEC DOi D (lcENLD`}FBB B(A0A8Gz 8C0A(B BBBA D ceFIE E(D0H8G@n8A0A(B BBBHcEE#MM( 0 PZXZo   \ 08 oooooZ00@0P0`0p00000000011 101@1P1`1p11111111122 202@2P2`2p22222222233 303@3P3`3p33333333344 404@4P4`4p44444444455 505@5P5`5p55555555566 606`GCC: (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1) 9.4.0.shstrtab.interp.note.gnu.property.note.gnu.build-id.note.ABI-tag.gnu.hash.dynsym.dynstr.gnu.version.gnu.version_r.rela.dyn.rela.plt.init.plt.got.plt.sec.text.fini.rodata.eh_frame_hdr.eh_frame.init_array.fini_array.data.rel.ro.dynamic.data.bss.comment 88 &XX$9|| Go8Q  Y aono`}8B00 00 0 0 @6@6 `6`6p<p<a 6666PZPJXZXJ`Z`J ZJ0\LP`P `PH0P+