# Typed::Result, Typed::Success and Typed::Failure A simple, strongly-typed monad for modeling results, helping you implement [Railway Oriented Programming concepts](https://blog.logrocket.com/what-is-railway-oriented-programming/) in Ruby. Helps alleviate error-driven development, all the while boosting your confidence with Sorbet static checks. ## Installation Install the gem and add to the application's Gemfile by executing: $ bundle add sorbet-result If bundler is not being used to manage dependencies, install the gem by executing: $ gem install sorbet-result ## Usage ### Getting Started Using a basic Result in your methods is as simple as indicating something could return a `Typed::Result`. In practice though, you won't return instances of `Typed::Result`, but rather `Typed::Success` or `Typed::Failure`. `Typed::Success` can hold a payload, and `Typed::Failure` can hold an error, but if you don't have such information to provide you can simply use `Typed::Success.blank` or `Typed::Failure.blank`. `Typed::Result` is powered by Sorbet's Generics, so you'll need to specify it as `Typed::Result[Success, Error]`, where `Success` represents the type of `payload` in case of a success, while `Error` represents the type of `error` in case of an error. ```ruby sig { params(resource_id: Integer).returns(Typed::Result[NilClass, NilClass]) } def call_api(resource_id) # something bad happened return Typed::Failure.blank # something other bad thing happened return Typed::Failure.blank # Success! Typed::Success.blank end ``` Generally, it's nice to have a payload with results, and it's nice to have more information on failures. We can indicate what types these are in our signatures for better static checks. Note that payloads and errors can be _any_ type. `Typed::Result`, `Typed::Success` and `Typed::Failure` are all generic types, so you can specify the payload and error types when you use them. `Typed::Result` will need both the success and the error types to be specified, while `Typed::Success` and `Typed::Failure` will only need the success or error type respectively. `Typed::Success.new` and `Typed::Failure.new` are generic methods, so the payload or error type will be inferred by the parameter type. ```ruby sig { params(resource_id: Integer).returns(Typed::Result[Float, String]) } def call_api(resource_id) # Something bad happened return Typed::Failure.new("I couldn't do it!") # => Typed::Failure[String] # Some other bad thing happened return Typed::Failure.new("I couldn't do it for another reason!") # => Typed::Failure[String] # Success! Typed::Success.new(1.12) # => Typed::Success[Float] end ``` *Note:* We use Sorbet's generics for payload and error typing. The generic payload and error types are erased at runtime, so you won't get a type error at runtime if you violate the generic types. These types will help you statically so be sure to run `srb tc` on your project. Further, if another part of your program needs the Result, it can depend on _only_ `Typed::Success`es (or `Typed::Failure`s if you're doing something with those results). ```ruby sig { params(success_result: Typed::Success[String]).void } def do_something_with_resource(success_result) success_result.payload # => String end ``` Finally, there are a few methods you can use on both `Typed::Result` types. ```ruby result = call_api(1) result.success? # => true on success, false on failure result.failure? # => true on failure, false on success result.payload # => raises error on failure, payload type on success result.error # => raises error on success, error type on failure result.payload_or("fallback") # => returns payload on success, given value on failure # You can combine all the above to write flow-sensitive type-checked code if result.success? T.assert_type!(result.payload, Float) else T.assert_type!(result.error, String) end ``` ### Chaining `Typed::Result` supports chaining, so you can chain together methods that return `Typed::Result`s using. To do so, use the `#and_then` method to transform the payload of a `Typed::Success` into another `Typed::Result`, or return a `Typed::Failure` as is. ```ruby # In this example, retrieve_user and send_notification both return a Typed::Result # retrieve_user: Typed::Result[User, RetrieveUserError # send_notification: Typed::Result[T::Boolean, SendNotificationError] res = retrieve_user(user_id) .and_then { |user| send_notification(user.email) } # this block will only run if retrieve_user returns a Typed::Success # The actual type of `res` is Typed::Result[T::Boolean, T.any(RetrieveUserError, SendNotificationError)] # because only the last operation can return a success, but any operation can return a failure. if res.success? # Notification sent successfully, we can do something with res.payload coming from send_notification. res.payload # => T::Boolean else # Something went wrong, res.error could be either from retrieve_user or send_notification res.error # => T.any(RetrieveUserError, SendNotificationError) end ``` You can also use the `#on_error` chain to take an action only on failure, such as logging or capturing error information in an error monitoring service. ```ruby # In this example, retrieve_user and send_notification both return a Typed::Result # retrieve_user: Typed::Result[User, RetrieveUserError # send_notification: Typed::Result[T::Boolean, SendNotificationError] res = retrieve_user(user_id) .and_then { |user| send_notification(user.email) } # this block will only run if retrieve_user returns a Typed::Success .on_error { |error| puts "Encountered this error: #{error}"} ``` If the above chain does not fail, the `puts` statement is never run. If the chain does yield a `Failure`, the `puts` block is executed and the `Failure` is ultimately returned. ### Testing We ship with a few Minitest assertions that can be used to easily verify Results. ```ruby # test_helper.rb require "minitest/result_assertions" # You also need add this to `sorbet/tapioca/require.rb` and rebuild the Minitest gem RBIs # *_test.rb @success = Typed::Success.new("Test Payload") @failure = Typed::Failure.new("Test Error") assert_success(@success) assert_failure(@failure) assert_payload("Test Payload", @success) assert_error("Test Error", @failure) # We also have the `refute_*` counterparts ``` ## Why use Results? Let's say you're working on a method that reaches out to an API and fetches a resource. We hope to get a successful response and continue on in our program, but you can imagine several scenarios where we don't get that response: our authentication could fail, the server could return a 5XX response code, or the resource we were querying could have moved or not exist any more. You might be tempted to use exceptions to model these "off-ramps" from the method. ```ruby sig { params(resource_id: Integer).returns(Float) } def call_api(resource_id) # something bad happened raise ArgumentError # something other bad thing happened raise StandardError # Success! 1.12 end ``` This has several downsides; primarily, this required your caller to _know_ what exceptions to watch out for, or risk bubbling the error all the way out of your program when you could have recovered from it. Our Sorbet signature also becomes less helpful, as we can't indicate what errors could be raised here. Railway Oriented Programming, which comes from the functional programming community, alleviates this by _expecting_ the failure states and making them a part of the normal flow of a method. Most errors are recoverable; at the very least we can message them back to the user in some way. We should inform the caller with a Result that could be either a Success or Failure, and allow them continue or take an "off-ramp" with a failure message. If we embrace this style of programming, our `call_api` method turns into this: ```ruby sig { params(resource_id: Integer).returns(Typed::Result[Float, String]) } def call_api(resource_id) # something bad happened return Typed::Failure.new("I couldn't do it!") # something other bad thing happened return Typed::Failure.new("I couldn't do it for another reason!") # Success! Typed::Success.new(1.12) end ``` Sorbet is useful here now, as it the signature covers all possible return values and informs the caller what it should do: check the result status first, then do something with the error or payload. Statically, Sorbet will also know the types associated with our Result for better typechecking across the codebase. Our caller doesn't need to guess which errors to rescue from (or doesn't need to be paranoid about rescuing all errors) and can proceed in both a success and a failure case. ## Development After checking out the repo, run `bin/setup` to install dependencies. Then, run `rake` to run Rubocop and the tests. You can also run `bin/console` for an interactive prompt that will allow you to experiment. To install this gem onto your local machine, run `bundle exec rake install`. ## Contributing Bug reports and pull requests are welcome on GitHub at https://github.com/maxveldink/sorbet-result. This project is intended to be a safe, welcoming space for collaboration, and contributors are expected to adhere to the [code of conduct](https://github.com/maxveldink/sorbet-result/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md). ## License The gem is available as open source under the terms of the [MIT License](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT). ## Code of Conduct Everyone interacting in this project's codebase, issue trackers, chat rooms and mailing lists is expected to follow the [code of conduct](https://github.com/maxveldink/sorbet-result/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md). ## Sponsorships I love creating in the open. If you find this or any other [maxveld.ink](https://maxveld.ink) content useful, please consider sponsoring me on [GitHub](https://github.com/sponsors/maxveldink).