- Start Date: (2015-10-29) - RFC PR: https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/pull/1310 - ActiveModelSerializers Issue: https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/issues/1298 # Summary Provide a consistent API for the user of the AMS. # Motivation The actual public API is defined under `ActiveModelSerializers`, `ActiveModel::Serializer` and `ActiveModel`. At the `ActiveModel::Serializer` we have: - `ActiveModel::Serializer.config` - `ActiveModel::Serializer` At the `ActiveModelSerializers` we have: - `ActiveModelSerializers::Model` - `ActiveModelSerializers.logger` At `ActiveModel` we have: - `ActiveModel::SerializableResource` The idea here is to provide a single namespace `ActiveModelSerializers` to the user. Following the same idea we have on other gems like [Devise](https://github.com/plataformatec/devise/blob/e9c82472ffe7c43a448945f77e034a0e47dde0bb/lib/devise.rb), [Refile](https://github.com/refile/refile/blob/6b24c293d044862dafbf1bfa4606672a64903aa2/lib/refile.rb) and [Active Job](https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/30bacc26f8f258b39e12f63fe52389a968d9c1ea/activejob/lib/active_job.rb) for example. This way we are clarifing the boundaries of [ActiveModelSerializers and Rails](https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#prehistory) and make clear that the `ActiveModel::Serializer` class is no longer the primary behavior of the ActiveModelSerializers. # Detailed design ## New classes and modules organization Since this will be a big change we can do this on baby steps, read small pull requests. A possible approach is: - All new code will be in `lib/active_model_serializers/` using the module namespace `ActiveModelSerializers`. - Move all content under `ActiveModel::Serializer` to be under `ActiveModelSerializers`, the adapter is on this steps; - Move all content under `ActiveModel` to be under `ActiveModelSerializers`, the `SerializableResource` is on this step; - Change all public API that doesn't make sense, keeping in mind only to keep this in the same namespace - Update the README; - Update the docs; The following table represents the current and the desired classes and modules at the first moment. | Current | Desired | Notes | |--------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------| | `ActiveModelSerializers` and `ActiveModel::Serializer` | `ActiveModelSerializers` | The main namespace | | `ActiveModelSerializers.logger` | `ActiveModelSerializers.logger` || | `ActiveModelSerializers::Model` | `ActiveModelSerializers::Model` || | `ActiveModel::SerializableResource` | `ActiveModelSerializers::SerializableResource` || | `ActiveModel::Serializer` | `ActiveModelSerializers::Serializer` | The name can be discussed in a future pull request. For example, we can rename this to `Resource` [following this idea](https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/pull/1301/files#r42963185) more info about naming in the next section| | `ActiveModel::Serializer.config` | `ActiveModelSerializers.config` || ## Renaming of class and modules When moving some content to the new namespace we can find some names that does not make much sense like `ActiveModel::Serializer::Adapter::JsonApi`. Discussion of renaming existing classes / modules and JsonApi objects will happen in separate pull requests, and issues, and in the google doc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rcrJr0sVcazY2Opd_6Kmv1iIwuHbI84s1P_NzFn-05c/edit?usp=sharing Some of names already have a definition. - Adapters get their own namespace under ActiveModelSerializers. E.g `ActiveModelSerializers::Adapter` - Serializers get their own namespace under ActiveModelSerializers. E.g `ActiveModelSerializers::Serializer` ## Keeping compatibility All moved classes or modules be aliased to their old name and location with deprecation warnings, such as [was done for CollectionSerializer](https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/pull/1251). # Drawbacks This will be a breaking change, so all users serializers will be broken after a major bump. All pull requests will need to rebase since the architeture will change a lot. # Alternatives We can keep the way it is, and keep in mind to not add another namespace as a public API. # Unresolved questions What is the better class name to be used to the class that will be inherited at the creation of a serializer. This can be discussed in other RFC or directly via pull request.