# Shoulda Context [![Gem Version][version-badge]][rubygems] [![Build Status][travis-badge]][travis] ![Downloads][downloads-badge] [![Hound][hound-badge]][hound] [version-badge]: https://img.shields.io/gem/v/shoulda-context.svg [rubygems]: https://rubygems.org/gems/shoulda-matchers [travis-badge]: https://img.shields.io/travis/thoughtbot/shoulda-context/master.svg [travis]: https://travis-ci.org/thoughtbot/shoulda-context [downloads-badge]: https://img.shields.io/gem/dtv/shoulda-context.svg [hound-badge]: https://img.shields.io/badge/Reviewed_by-Hound-8E64B0.svg [hound]: https://houndci.com Shoulda Context makes it easy to write understandable and maintainable tests under Minitest and Test::Unit within Rails projects or plain Ruby projects. It's fully compatible with your existing tests and requires no retooling to use. **[View the documentation for the latest version (1.2.2)][rubydocs] • [View the changelog][changelog]** [changelog]: CHANGELOG.md --- ## Usage Instead of writing Ruby methods with `lots_of_underscores`, Shoulda Context lets you name your tests and group them together using English. At a minimum, the gem provides some convenience layers around core Minitest functionality. For instance, this test case: ```ruby class CalculatorTest < Minitest::Test context "a calculator" do setup do @calculator = Calculator.new end should "add two numbers for the sum" do assert_equal 4, @calculator.sum(2, 2) end should "multiply two numbers for the product" do assert_equal 10, @calculator.product(2, 5) end end end ``` is a prettier, but functionally equivalent, way of saying: ```ruby class CalculatorTest < Minitest::Test def setup @calculator = Calculator.new end define_method "test_: a calculator should add two numbers for the sum" do assert_equal 4, @calculator.sum(2, 2) end define_method "test_: a calculator should multiply two numbers for the product" do assert_equal 10, @calculator.product(2, 5) end end ``` However, Shoulda Context also provides functionality apart from Minitest / Test::Unit that allows you to shorten tests drastically by making use of RSpec-compatible matchers. For instance, with [Shoulda Matchers][shoulda-matchers] you can write such tests as: ```ruby class User < ActiveSupport::TestCase context "validations" do subject { FactoryBot.build(:user) } should validate_presence_of(:first_name) should validate_presence_of(:last_name) should validate_uniqueness_of(:email) should_not allow_value('weird').for(:email) end end ``` [shoulda-matchers]: https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers ## API ### DSL The primary method in Shoulda Context's API is `context`, which declares a group of a tests. These methods are available inside of a `context`: * `setup` — a DSL-y alternative to defining a `setup` method * `teardown` — a DSL-y alternative to defining a `teardown` method * `should` — There are two forms: 1. when passed a name + block, creates a test equivalent to defining a `test_` method 2. when passed a matcher, creates a test that will run the matcher, asserting that it passes * `should_not` — like the matcher version of `should`, but creates a test that asserts that the matcher fails * `should_eventually` — allows you to temporarily skip tests * `context` — creates a subcontext These methods are available within a test case class, but outside of a `context`: * `should` — same as above * `should_not` — same as above * `should_eventually` — same as above * `described_type` — returns the class being tested, as determined by the class name of the outermost class * `subject` — lets you define an object that is the primary focus of the tests within a context; this is most useful when using a matcher as the matcher will make use of this as _its_ subject And these methods are available inside of a test (whether defined via a method or via `should`): * `subject` — an instance of the class under test, which is derived automatically from the name of the test case class but is overridable via the class method version of `subject` above [rubydocs]: http://rubydoc.info/github/thoughtbot/shoulda-context/master/frames ### Assertions In addition to the main API, the gem also provides some extra assertions that may be of use: * `assert_same_elements` — compares two arrays for equality, but ignoring ordering * `assert_contains` — asserts that an array has an item * `assert_does_not_contain` — the opposite of `assert_contains` * `assert_accepts` — what `should` uses internally; asserts that a matcher object matches against a value * `assert_reject` — what `should_not` uses internally; asserts that a matcher object does not match against a value ## Note on running tests Normally, you will run a single test like this: ruby -I lib -I test path_to_test.rb -n name_of_test_method When using Shoulda Context, however, you'll need to put a space after the test name: ruby -I lib -I test path_to_test.rb -n "test_: a calculator should add two numbers for the sum. " If this is too cumbersome, consider using the [m] gem to run tests instead: m path_to_test.rb:39 [m]: https://github.com/qrush/m ## Compatibility Shoulda Context is tested and supported against Rails 5.x, Rails 4.2, Minitest 5, Test::Unit 3, and Ruby 2.3+. ## Credits Shoulda Context is maintained by [Travis Jeffery][travis-jeffery] and thoughtbot. Thank you to all the [contributors]. [travis-jeffery]: https://github.com/travisjeffery [contributors]: https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-context/contributors ## License Shoulda Context is copyright © 2006-2019 [thoughtbot, inc][thoughtbot-website]. It is free software, and may be redistributed under the terms specified in the [MIT-LICENSE](MIT-LICENSE) file. [thoughtbot-website]: https://thoughtbot.com