Sha256: 75a859cb56a7f9e019cf91a735f53e93fd85ef9de699ced04e2cbb50592c2fd0
Contents?: true
Size: 1.23 KB
Versions: 12
Compression:
Stored size: 1.23 KB
Contents
Feature: Nested Steps with either table or doc string
Background:
Given a scenario with a step that looks like this:
"""gherkin
Given two turtles
"""
Scenario: Use #step with table
Given a step definition that looks like this:
"""ruby
Given /turtles:/ do |table|
table.hashes.each do |row|
puts row[:name]
end
end
"""
And a step definition that looks like this:
"""ruby
Given /two turtles/ do
step %{turtles:}, table(%{
| name |
| Sturm |
| Liouville |
})
end
"""
When I run the feature with the progress formatter
Then the output should contain:
"""
Sturm
Liouville
"""
Scenario: Use #step with Doc String
Given a step definition that looks like this:
"""ruby
Given /two turtles/ do
step %{turtles:}, "Sturm and Lioville"
end
"""
And a step definition that looks like this:
"""ruby
Given /turtles:/ do |text|
puts "#{text}:#{text.class}"
end
"""
When I run the feature with the progress formatter
Then the output should contain:
"""
Sturm and Lioville:String
"""
Version data entries
12 entries across 12 versions & 2 rubygems