.\NDependOut TestSolution TestSolution.Tests TestSolution.FailingTests TestSolution.MSpecTests TestSolution.XUnitTests mscorlib nunit.framework Machine.Specifications Machine.Specifications.NUnit xunit C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727 C:\Program Files\Reference Assemblies\Microsoft\Framework\v3.0 C:\Program Files\Reference Assemblies\Microsoft\Framework\v3.5 .\TestSolution\bin\Debug .\TestSolution.Tests\bin\Debug .\TestSolution.FailingTests\bin\Debug .\TestSolution.MSpecTests\bin\Debug .\TestSolution.XUnitTests\bin\Debug
Application Metrics
Assemblies Metrics
VisualNDepend View
Assemblies Abstractness vs. Instability
Assemblies Dependencies
Assemblies Dependencies Diagram
Assemblies build order
NDepend information and warnings
CQL Queries and Constraints
Types Metrics
Types Dependencies
// <Name>Quick summary of methods to refactor</Name>\r\n\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS /*OUT OF "YourGeneratedCode" */ WHERE \r\n\r\n // Metrics' definitions\r\n ( NbLinesOfCode > 30 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbLinesOfCode\r\n NbILInstructions > 200 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbILInstructions\r\n CyclomaticComplexity > 20 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#CC\r\n ILCyclomaticComplexity > 50 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#ILCC\r\n ILNestingDepth > 4 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#ILNestingDepth\r\n NbParameters > 5 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbParameters\r\n NbVariables > 8 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbVariables\r\n NbOverloads > 6 ) // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbOverloads\r\n AND \r\n\r\n // Here are some ways to avoid taking account of generated methods.\r\n !( NameIs "InitializeComponent()" OR\r\n // NDepend.CQL.GeneratedAttribute is defined in the redistributable assembly $NDependInstallDir$\Lib\NDepend.CQL.dll\r\n // You can define your own attribute to mark "Generated".\r\n HasAttribute "OPTIONAL:NDepend.CQL.GeneratedAttribute") // <Name>Methods too big (NbLinesOfCode)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE NbLinesOfCode > 30 ORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC\r\n// METHODS WHERE NbLinesOfCode > 30 are extremely complex and \r\n// should be split in smaller methods \r\n// (except if they are automatically generated by a tool).\r\n// See the definition of the NbLinesOfCode metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbLinesOfCode // <Name>Methods too big (NbILInstructions)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE NbILInstructions > 200 ORDER BY NbILInstructions DESC\r\n// METHODS WHERE NbILInstructions > 200 are extremely complex and \r\n// should be split in smaller methods \r\n// (except if they are automatically generated by a tool).\r\n// See the definition of the NbILInstructions metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbILInstructions // <Name>Methods too complex (CyclomaticComplexity)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE CyclomaticComplexity > 20 ORDER BY CyclomaticComplexity DESC\r\n// METHODS WHERE CyclomaticComplexity > 15 are hard to understand and maintain.\r\n// METHODS WHERE CyclomaticComplexity > 30 are extremely complex and should be split \r\n// in smaller methods (except if they are automatically generated by a tool).\r\n// See the definition of the CyclomaticComplexity metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#CC // <Name>Methods too complex (ILCyclomaticComplexity)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE ILCyclomaticComplexity > 40 ORDER BY ILCyclomaticComplexity DESC\r\n// METHODS WHERE ILCyclomaticComplexity > 20 are hard to understand and maintain.\r\n// METHODS WHERE ILCyclomaticComplexity > 40 are extremely complex and should be split \r\n// in smaller methods (except if they are automatically generated by a tool).\r\n// See the definition of the ILCyclomaticComplexity metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#ILCC // <Name>Methods too complex (ILNestingDepth)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE ILNestingDepth > 4 ORDER BY ILNestingDepth DESC\r\n// METHODS WHERE ILNestingDepth > 4 are hard to understand and maintain. \r\n// METHODS WHERE ILNestingDepth > 8 is higher than 8 are extremely complex and should be split in smaller methods \r\n// (except if they are automatically generated by a tool). \r\n// See the definition of the NbILInstructions metric here http://www.NDepend.com/Metrics.aspx#ILNestingDepth // <Name>Methods poorly commented (PercentageComment)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE PercentageComment < 20 AND NbLinesOfCode > 10 ORDER BY PercentageComment ASC\r\n// METHODS WHERE %Comment < 20 and that have at least 10 lines of code should be more commented.\r\n// See the definition of the PercentageComment metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#PercentageComment // <Name>Methods with too many parameters (NbParameters)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE NbParameters > 5 ORDER BY NbParameters DESC\r\n// METHODS WHERE NbParameters > 5 might be painful to call and might degrade performance. \r\n// You should prefer using additional properties/fields to the declaring type to handle \r\n// numerous states. Another alternative is to provide a class or structure dedicated to \r\n// handle arguments passing (for example see the class System.Diagnostics.ProcessStartInfo \r\n// and the method System.Diagnostics.Process.Start(ProcessStartInfo))\r\n// See the definition of the NbParameters metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbParameters // <Name>Methods with too many local variables (NbVariables)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE NbVariables > 15 ORDER BY NbVariables DESC\r\n// METHODS WHERE NbVariables > 8 are hard to understand and maintain.\r\n// METHODS WHERE NbVariables > 15 are extremely complex and should be split in \r\n// smaller methods (except if they are automatically generated by a tool).\r\n// See the definition of the Nbvariables metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#Nbvariables // <Name>Methods with too many overloads (NbOverloads)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE NbOverloads > 6 ORDER BY NbOverloads DESC\r\n// METHODS WHERE NbParameters > 6 might be a problem to maintain and provoke higher coupling than necessary. \r\n// This might also reveal a potential misused of the C# and VB.NET language that since C#3 and VB9 support \r\n// object initialization. This feature helps reducing the number of constructors of a class.\r\n// See the definition of the NbOverloads metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbOverloads // <Name>Types with too many methods</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE NbMethods > 20 ORDER BY NbMethods DESC\r\n// TYPES WHERE NbMethods > 20 might be hard to understand and maintain \r\n// but there might be cases where it is relevant to have a high value for NbMethods. \r\n// For example, the System.Windows.Forms.DataGridView standard class has more than 1000 methods.\r\n// See the definition of the NbMethods metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbMethods // <Name>Types with too many fields</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE NbFields > 20 AND !IsEnumeration ORDER BY NbFields DESC\r\n// TYPES WHERE NbFields > 20 AND !IsEnumeration might be hard to understand and maintain \r\n// but there might be cases where it is relevant to have a high value for NbFields. \r\n// For example, the System.Windows.Forms.Control standard class has more than 200 fields. \r\n// The value of the metric NbFields might be a better indicator of complex type.\r\n// See the definition of the NbFields metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbFields // <Name>Types with poor cohesion (LCOM)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE LCOM > 0.8 AND NbFields > 10 AND NbMethods >10 ORDER BY LCOM DESC\r\n// TYPES WHERE LCOM > 0.8 AND NbFields > 10 AND NbMethods >10 might be problematic. \r\n// However, it is very hard to avoid such non-cohesive types. The LCOMHS metric\r\n// is often considered as more efficient to detect non-cohesive types.\r\n// See the definition of the LCOM metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#LCOM // <Name>Types with poor cohesion (LCOMHS)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE LCOMHS > 0.95 AND NbFields > 10 AND NbMethods >10 ORDER BY LCOMHS DESC\r\n// TYPES WHERE LCOMHS > 1.0 AND NbFields > 10 AND NbMethods >10 should be avoided. \r\n// Note that this constraint is stronger than the constraint \r\n// TYPES WHERE LCOM > 0.8 AND NbFields > 10 AND NbMethods >10. \r\n// See the definition of the LCOMHS metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#LCOMHS // <Name>Assembly should not contain namespaces dependency cycles</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 ASSEMBLIES WHERE ContainsNamespaceDependencyCycle\r\n// Dependency cycles between namespaces must be avoided \r\n// in order to have a levelized and comprehensive design.\r\n// More info available on the screencast 'Reduce the complexity' http://s3.amazonaws.com/NDependOnlineDemos/NDependReducingComplexity_viewlet_swf.html\r\n// You can also read this article http://www.theserverside.net/tt/articles/showarticle.tss?id=ControllingDependencies // <Name>Type should not have too many responsabilities (Efferent Coupling)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE TypeCe > 50 ORDER BY TypeCe DESC \r\n// The Efferent Coupling (TypeCe) for a particular type is the number of types \r\n// it directly depends on. Notice that types declared in tier assemblies are taken into account. \r\n\r\n// Types that depends on too many others type (more than 50) are complex and have\r\n// more than one responsability. They are good candidate for refactoring.\r\n\r\n// More information available in this article:\r\n// http://codebetter.com/blogs/patricksmacchia/archive/2008/02/15/code-metrics-on-coupling-dead-code-design-flaws-and-re-engineering.aspx\r\n\r\n // <Name>A stateless type might be turned into a static type</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE \r\n SizeOfInst ==0 AND \r\n NbInterfacesImplemented == 0 AND // To be accurate, this constraint doesn't take \r\n // account of types that implement some interfaces.\r\n !IsStatic AND \r\n !IsGeneric AND \r\n !IsInterface \r\n// It indicates stateless types that might eventually be turned into static classes.\r\n// See the definition of the SizeOfInst metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#SizeOfInst // <Name>Class shouldn't be too deep in inheritance tree </Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE DepthOfInheritance >= 6 ORDER BY DepthOfInheritance DESC \r\n// Branches too long in the derivation should be avoided.\r\n// See the definition of the DepthOfInheritance metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#DIT\r\n \r\n// You can discard specific classes with by-design high DepthOfInheritance with such condition for example:\r\n// AND !DeriveFrom "System.Windows.Forms.Form" // <Name>Class with no descendant should be sealed if possible</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE \r\n IsClass AND \r\n NbChildren ==0 AND \r\n !IsSealed AND \r\n !IsStatic \r\n // AND !IsPublic : You might want to add this condition if you are developping a framework\r\n // with classes that are intended to be sub-classed by your clients.\r\n ORDER BY NbLinesOfCode // <Name>Classes that are candidate to be turned into Structures</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE \r\n IsClass AND\r\n SizeOfInst <= 16 AND // Structure instance must not be too big, else it degrades performance.\r\n NbChildren == 0 AND // Must not have children\r\n DepthOfInheritance == 1 // Must derive directly from System.Object\r\n // AND IsSealed : You might want to add this condition to restreint the set.\r\n // AND IsImmutable : Structures should be immutable type.\r\n // AND !IsPublic : You might want to add this condition if you are developping a framework\r\n // with classes that are intended to be sub-classed by your clients.\r\n // <Name>Avoid namespaces with few types</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 NAMESPACES WHERE NbTypes < 5 ORDER BY NbTypes ASC \r\n\r\n// Make sure that there is a logical organization to each of your namespaces, \r\n// and that there is a valid reason for putting types in a sparsely populated \r\n// namespace. Namespaces should contain types that are used together in most \r\n// scenarios. When their applications are mutually exclusive, types should be \r\n// located in separate namespaces // <Name>Nested types should not be visible</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE IsNested AND !IsPrivate AND !IsInFrameworkAssembly \r\n\r\n// A nested type is a type declared within the scope of another type. \r\n// Nested types are useful for encapsulating private implementation details of the containing type. \r\n// Used for this purpose, nested types should not be externally visible. Do not use externally \r\n// visible nested types for logical grouping or to avoid name collisions; instead, use namespaces. // <Name>Avoid empty interfaces</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE IsInterface AND NbMethods == 0\r\n\r\n// Interfaces define members that provide a behavior or usage contract. The functionality described by \r\n// the interface can be adopted by any type, regardless of where the type appears in the inheritance\r\n// hierarchy. A type implements an interface by providing implementations for the interface's members.\r\n// An empty interface does not define any members, and as such, does not define a contract that can be implemented.\r\n\r\n// If your design includes empty interfaces that types are expected to implement, you are probably using\r\n// an interface as a marker, or a way of identifying a group of types. If this identification will occur \r\n// at runtime, the correct way to accomplish this is to use a custom attribute. Use the presence or absence \r\n// of the attribute, or the attribute's properties, to identify the target types. If the identification must\r\n// occur at compile time, then using an empty interface is acceptable. // <Name>Declare types in namespaces</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT NAMESPACES WHERE NameIs "" AND !IsInFrameworkAssembly \r\n\r\n// Types are declared within namespaces to prevent name collisions, and as a way of organizing related types \r\n// in an object hierarchy. Types outside any named namespace are in a global namespace that cannot be referenced in code.\r\n// If an anonymous namespace can be found, it means that it contains types outside of namespaces. // <Name>Empty static constructor can be discarded</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE IsClassConstructor AND NbLinesOfCode == 0 // <Name>Assemblies with poor cohesion (RelationalCohesion)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 ASSEMBLIES WHERE RelationalCohesion < 1.5 OR RelationalCohesion > 4.0\r\n\r\n// As classes inside an assembly should be strongly related, \r\n// the cohesion should be high. On the other hand, a value which is too high may \r\n// indicate over-coupling. A good range for RelationalCohesion is 1.5 to 4.0.\r\n// See the definition of the RelationalCohesion metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#RelationalCohesion // <Name>Assemblies that don't satisfy the Abstractness/Instability principle</Name>\r\n\r\nWARN IF Percentage > 15 IN SELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE NormDistFromMainSeq > 0.7 ORDER BY NormDistFromMainSeq DESC\r\n\r\n// See the definition of the NormDistFromMainSeq metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#DitFromMainSeq // <Name>Instances size shouldn't be too big (SizeOfInst)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE SizeOfInst > 64 ORDER BY SizeOfInst DESC\r\n// TYPES WHERE SizeOfInst > 64 might degrade performance (depending on the number of \r\n// instances created at runtime) and might be hard to maintain. \r\n// However it is not a rule since sometime there is no alternative \r\n// (the size of instances of the System.Net.NetworkInformation.SystemIcmpV6Statistics \r\n// standard class is 2064 bytes).\r\n// See the definition of the SizeOfInst metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#SizeOfInst // <Name>Boxing/unboxing should be avoided (Method)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Percentage > 5 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE IsUsingBoxing OR IsUsingUnboxing \r\n// Thanks to generics, boxing and unboxing should be rare. // <Name>Boxing/unboxing should be avoided (Type)</Name>\r\nWARN IF Percentage > 5 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE IsUsingBoxing OR IsUsingUnboxing \r\n// Thanks to generics, boxing and unboxing should be rare. // <Name>Attribute classes should be sealed</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE IsAttributeClass \r\nAND !IsSealed AND !IsAbstract AND IsPublic AND !IsInFrameworkAssembly \r\n\r\n// The .NET Framework class library provides methods for retrieving custom attributes. \r\n// By default, these methods search the attribute inheritance hierarchy; for example \r\n// System.Attribute.GetCustomAttribute searches for the specified attribute type, or \r\n// any attribute type that extends the specified attribute type. Sealing the attribute \r\n// eliminates the search through the inheritance hierarchy, and can improve performance. // <Name>Potentially unused methods</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE \r\n MethodCa == 0 AND // Ca=0 -> No Afferent Coupling -> The method is not used in the context of this application.\r\n !IsPublic AND // Public methods might be used by client applications of your assemblies.\r\n !IsEntryPoint AND // Main() method is not used by-design.\r\n !IsExplicitInterfaceImpl AND // The IL code never explicitely calls explicit interface methods implementation.\r\n !IsClassConstructor AND // The IL code never explicitely calls class constructors.\r\n !IsFinalizer // The IL code never explicitely calls finalizers.\r\n // <Name>Potentially unused fields</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 FIELDS WHERE \r\n FieldCa == 0 AND // Ca=0 -> No Afferent Coupling -> The field is not used in the context of this application.\r\n !IsPublic AND // Although not recommended, public fields might be used by client applications of your assemblies.\r\n !IsLiteral AND // The IL code never explicitely uses literal fields.\r\n !IsEnumValue AND // The IL code never explicitely uses enumeration value.\r\n !NameIs "value__" // Field named 'value__' are relative to enumerations and the IL code never explicitely uses them. // <Name>Potentially unused types</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE \r\n TypeCa == 0 AND // Ca=0 -> No Afferent Coupling -> The type is not used in the context of this application.\r\n !IsPublic AND // Public types might be used by client applications of your assemblies.\r\n !NameIs "Program" // Generally, types named Program contain a Main() entry-point method and this condition avoid to consider such type as unused code.\r\n // <Name>Fields should be declared as private</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 FIELDS WHERE \r\n !IsPrivate AND \r\n // These conditions filter cases where fields doesn't represent state that should be encapsulated. \r\n !IsInFrameworkAssembly AND \r\n !IsGeneratedByCompiler AND \r\n !IsSpecialName AND \r\n !IsInitOnly AND \r\n !IsLiteral AND \r\n !IsEnumValue // <Name>Methods that could be declared as 'internal' in C#, 'Friend' in VB.NET</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE CouldBeInternal // <Name>Methods that could be declared as 'protected internal' in C#, 'Protected Friend' in VB.NET</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE CouldBeInternalProtected // <Name>Methods that could be declared as 'protected' in C#, 'Protected' in VB.NET</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE CouldBeProtected // <Name>Methods that could be declared as 'private' in C#, 'Private' in VB.NET</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE CouldBePrivate // <Name>Methods that should be declared as 'public' in C#, 'Public' in VB.NET</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE ShouldBePublic \r\n// The keyword 'ShouldBePublic' shows code elements declared as 'internal\Friend' that are used outside of their assembly\r\n// thanks to the Attribute System.Runtime.CompilerServices.InternalsVisibleTo // <Name>Types that could be declared as internal</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE CouldBeInternal // <Name>Types that could be declared as 'protected internal' in C#, 'Protected Friend' in VB.NET</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE CouldBeInternalProtected // <Name>Types that could be declared as 'protected' in C#, 'Protected' in VB.NET</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE CouldBeProtected // <Name>Types that could be declared as 'private' in C#, 'Private' in VB.NET</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE CouldBePrivate // <Name>Types that should be declared as 'public' in C#, 'Public' in VB.NET</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE ShouldBePublic \r\n// The keyword 'ShouldBePublic' shows code elements declared as 'internal\Friend' that are used outside of their assembly\r\n// thanks to the Attribute System.Runtime.CompilerServices.InternalsVisibleTo // <Name>Fields that could be declared as internal</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 FIELDS WHERE CouldBeInternal // <Name>Fields that could be declared as 'protected internal' in C#, 'Protected Friend' in VB.NET</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 FIELDS WHERE CouldBeInternalProtected // <Name>Fields that could be declared as 'protected' in C#, 'Protected' in VB.NET</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 FIELDS WHERE CouldBeProtected // <Name>Fields that could be declared as 'private' in C#, 'Private' in VB.NET</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 FIELDS WHERE CouldBePrivate // <Name>Fields that should be declared as 'public' in C#, 'Public' in VB.NET</Name>\r\nSELECT FIELDS WHERE ShouldBePublic \r\n// The keyword 'ShouldBePublic' shows code elements declared as 'internal\Friend' that are used outside of their assembly\r\n// thanks to the Attribute System.Runtime.CompilerServices.InternalsVisibleTo // <Name>API Breaking Changes: Methods</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS\r\nWHERE IsPublic AND (VisibilityWasChanged OR WasRemoved)\r\n\r\n// This constraint warns if a public method is not public anymore or if it has been removed.\r\n// This can break the code of your clients.\r\n// More information on breaking changes here: \r\n// http://codebetter.com/blogs/patricksmacchia/archive/2008/01/20/avoid-api-breaking-changes.aspx\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Analysis Comparison\r\n\r\n // <Name>API Breaking Changes: Types</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES\r\nWHERE IsPublic AND (VisibilityWasChanged OR WasRemoved)\r\n\r\n// This constraint warns if a public type is not public anymore or if it has been removed.\r\n// This can break the code of your clients.\r\n// More information on breaking changes here: \r\n// http://codebetter.com/blogs/patricksmacchia/archive/2008/01/20/avoid-api-breaking-changes.aspx\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Analysis Comparison\r\n\r\n\r\n // <Name>API Breaking Changes: Interfaces</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES\r\nWHERE IsInterface AND IsPublic AND (WasChanged AND !CommentsWereChanged)\r\n\r\n// This constraint warns if a public interface has been changed, but not because of comment change.\r\n// This can break the code of your clients that implements such interface.\r\n// More information on breaking changes here: \r\n// http://codebetter.com/blogs/patricksmacchia/archive/2008/01/20/avoid-api-breaking-changes.aspx\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Analysis Comparison // <Name>Methods added</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE WasAdded\r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Methods removed</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE WasRemoved \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Methods where code was changed</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE CodeWasChanged \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Methods where comments were changed</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE CommentsWereChanged \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Methods where visibility was changed</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE VisibilityWasChanged \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Methods that became obsolete</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE BecameObsolete \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Fields added</Name>\r\nSELECT FIELDS WHERE WasAdded\r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Fields removed</Name>\r\nSELECT FIELDS WHERE WasRemoved \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Types added</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE WasAdded\r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Types removed</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE WasRemoved \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Types where code was changed</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE CodeWasChanged \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Types where comments were changed</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE CommentsWereChanged \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Types where visibility was changed</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE VisibilityWasChanged \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tyoes that became obsolete</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE BecameObsolete \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Namespaces added</Name>\r\nSELECT NAMESPACES WHERE WasAdded\r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Namespaces removed</Name>\r\nSELECT NAMESPACES WHERE WasRemoved \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Namespaces where code was changed</Name>\r\nSELECT NAMESPACES WHERE CodeWasChanged \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Namespaces where comments were changed</Name>\r\nSELECT NAMESPACES WHERE CommentsWereChanged \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Assemblies added</Name>\r\nSELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE WasAdded\r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Assemblies removed</Name>\r\nSELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE WasRemoved \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Assemblies where code was changed</Name>\r\nSELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE CodeWasChanged \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Assemblies where comments were changed</Name>\r\nSELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE CommentsWereChanged \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tier Methods that were not used and that are now used</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE IsUsedRecently \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tier Methods that were used and that are not used anymore</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE IsNotUsedAnymore \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tier Types that were not used and that are now used</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE IsUsedRecently \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tier Types that were used and that are not used anymore</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE IsNotUsedAnymore \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tier Types where usage changed</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE IsUsedDifferently \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tier Namespaces that were not used and that are now used</Name>\r\nSELECT NAMESPACES WHERE IsUsedRecently \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tier Namespaces that were used and that are not used anymore</Name>\r\nSELECT NAMESPACES WHERE IsNotUsedAnymore \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tier Namespaces where usage changed</Name>\r\nSELECT NAMESPACES WHERE IsUsedDifferently \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tier Assemblies that were not used and that are now used</Name>\r\nSELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE IsUsedRecently \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tier Assemblies that were used and that are not used anymore</Name>\r\nSELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE IsNotUsedAnymore \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tier Assemblies where usage changed</Name>\r\nSELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE IsUsedDifferently \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tier Fields that were not used and that are now used</Name>\r\nSELECT FIELDS WHERE IsUsedRecently \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Tier Fields that were used and that are not used anymore</Name>\r\nSELECT FIELDS WHERE IsNotUsedAnymore \r\n\r\n// To run this query properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base // <Name>Method changed 100% covered by tests</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE PercentageCoverage == 100 AND CodeWasChanged ORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Method added 100% covered by tests</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE WasAdded AND PercentageCoverage == 100 ORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Method changed partially covered by tests</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE \r\n PercentageCoverage < 100 AND PercentageCoverage > 0 AND\r\n CodeWasChanged \r\n ORDER BY PercentageCoverage DESC , NbLinesOfCodeCovered , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Method added partially covered by tests</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE \r\n PercentageCoverage < 100 AND PercentageCoverage > 0 AND\r\n WasAdded \r\n ORDER BY PercentageCoverage DESC , NbLinesOfCodeCovered , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Method changed not covered at all</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE PercentageCoverage == 0 AND CodeWasChanged ORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Method added not covered at all</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE PercentageCoverage == 0 AND WasAdded ORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Coverage regression on methods 100% covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE \r\nHasAttribute "OPTIONAL:NDepend.CQL.FullCoveredAttribute" AND PercentageCoverage < 100\r\n\r\n// NDepend.CQL.FullCoveredAttribute is defined in the redistributable assembly $NDependInstallDir$\Lib\NDepend.CQL.dll\r\n// You can define your own attribute to tag '100% covered' methods.\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Coverage regression on methods 100% Branch-covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE \r\nHasAttribute "OPTIONAL:NDepend.CQL.FullBranchCoveredAttribute" AND PercentageBranchCoverage < 100\r\n\r\n// NDepend.CQL.FullCoveredAttribute is defined in the redistributable assembly $NDependInstallDir$\Lib\NDepend.CQL.dll\r\n// You can define your own attribute to tag '100% branch covered' methods.\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly branch coverage data must be gathered from NCover™.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx\r\n\r\n// The metric BranchCoverage is not available if you are using Visual Studio™ Coverage. // <Name>Coverage regression on type 100% covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE \r\nHasAttribute "OPTIONAL:NDepend.CQL.FullCoveredAttribute" AND PercentageCoverage < 100\r\n\r\n// NDepend.CQL.FullCoveredAttribute is defined in the redistributable assembly $NDependInstallDir$\Lib\NDepend.CQL.dll\r\n// You can define your own attribute to tag '100% covered' types.\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Coverage regression on assembly 100% covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE \r\nHasAttribute "OPTIONAL:NDepend.CQL.FullCoveredAttribute" AND PercentageCoverage < 100\r\n\r\n// NDepend.CQL.FullCoveredAttribute is defined in the redistributable assembly $NDependInstallDir$\Lib\NDepend.CQL.dll\r\n// You can define your own attribute to tag '100% covered' assemblies.\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Coverage regression on methods at least 95% covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE \r\nHasAttribute "OPTIONAL:NDepend.CQL.MoreThan95PercentCoveredAttribute" AND PercentageCoverage < 95\r\n\r\n// NDepend.CQL.MoreThan95PercentCoveredAttribute is defined in the redistributable assembly $NDependInstallDir$\Lib\NDepend.CQL.dll\r\n// You can define your own attribute to tag 'at least 95% Covered' methods.\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Coverage regression on types at least 95% covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE \r\nHasAttribute "OPTIONAL:NDepend.CQL.MoreThan95PercentCoveredAttribute" AND PercentageCoverage < 95\r\n\r\n// NDepend.CQL.MoreThan95PercentCoveredAttribute is defined in the redistributable assembly $NDependInstallDir$\Lib\NDepend.CQL.dll\r\n// You can define your own attribute to tag 'at least 95% Covered' types.\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Coverage regression on assemblies at least 95% covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE \r\nHasAttribute "OPTIONAL:NDepend.CQL.MoreThan95PercentCoveredAttribute" AND PercentageCoverage < 95\r\n\r\n// NDepend.CQL.MoreThan95PercentCoveredAttribute is defined in the redistributable assembly $NDependInstallDir$\Lib\NDepend.CQL.dll\r\n// You can define your own attribute to tag 'at least 95% Covered' assemblies.\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Complex methods should be 100% covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS /*OUT OF "YourGeneratedCode" */ WHERE \r\n // These metrics' definitions are available here: http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#MetricsOnMethods\r\n ( NbILInstructions > 200 OR \r\n ILCyclomaticComplexity > 50 OR \r\n ILNestingDepth > 4 OR\r\n NbParameters > 5 OR \r\n NbVariables > 8 OR\r\n NbOverloads > 6 ) AND \r\n !PercentageCoverage < 100\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Complex methods should be 100% covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS /*OUT OF "YourGeneratedCode" */ WHERE \r\n // These metrics' definitions are available here: http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#MetricsOnMethods\r\n ( NbILInstructions > 200 OR \r\n ILCyclomaticComplexity > 50 OR \r\n ILNestingDepth > 4 OR\r\n NbParameters > 5 OR \r\n NbVariables > 8 OR\r\n NbOverloads > 6 ) AND \r\n !PercentageCoverage < 100\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Methods 100% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE PercentageCoverage == 100\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Types 100% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE PercentageCoverage == 100\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Namespaces 100% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT NAMESPACES WHERE PercentageCoverage == 100\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Assemblies 100% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE PercentageCoverage == 100\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Methods not covered</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE PercentageCoverage == 0\r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Types not covered</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE PercentageCoverage == 0\r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Namespaces not covered</Name>\r\nSELECT NAMESPACES WHERE PercentageCoverage == 0\r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Assemblies not covered</Name>\r\nSELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE PercentageCoverage == 0\r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Methods 95% to 99% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE PercentageCoverage >= 95 AND PercentageCoverage <= 99 \r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Types 95% to 99% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE PercentageCoverage >= 95 AND PercentageCoverage <= 99 \r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Namespaces 95% to 99% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT NAMESPACES WHERE PercentageCoverage >= 95 AND PercentageCoverage <= 99 \r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Assemblies 95% to 99% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE PercentageCoverage >= 95 AND PercentageCoverage <= 99 \r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Methods 70% to 94% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE PercentageCoverage >= 70 AND PercentageCoverage <= 94\r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Types 70% to 94% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE PercentageCoverage >= 70 AND PercentageCoverage <= 94\r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Namespaces 70% to 94% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT NAMESPACES WHERE PercentageCoverage >= 70 AND PercentageCoverage <= 94\r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Assemblies 70% to 94% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE PercentageCoverage >= 70 AND PercentageCoverage <= 94\r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Methods 1% to 69% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE PercentageCoverage >= 1 AND PercentageCoverage <= 69\r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Types 1% to 69% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE PercentageCoverage >= 1 AND PercentageCoverage <= 69\r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Namespaces 1% to 69% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT NAMESPACES WHERE PercentageCoverage >= 1 AND PercentageCoverage <= 69\r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Assemblies 1% to 69% covered</Name>\r\nSELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE PercentageCoverage >= 1 AND PercentageCoverage <= 69\r\nORDER BY NbLinesOfCode DESC , NbLinesOfCodeNotCovered \r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Fields should be marked as ReadOnly when possible</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT FIELDS WHERE IsImmutable AND !IsInitOnly\r\n\r\n// A field that matches the condition IsImmutable is a field that is assigned only by constructors of its class.\r\n// For an instance field, this means its value will remain constant throught the lifetime of the object.\r\n// For a static field, this means its value will remain constant throught the lifetime of the program.\r\n// In both cases, such field can safely be marked with the C# readonly keyword (ReadOnly in VB.NET).\r\n\r\n// The condition IsInitOnly matches fields that are marked with the C# readonly keyword (ReadOnly in VB.NET).\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n // <Name>Structures should be immutable</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE IsStructure AND !IsImmutable AND !IsInFrameworkAssembly\r\n\r\n// It is deemed as a good practice to make your structure immutable.\r\n// An object is immutable if its state doesn’t change once the object has been created. \r\n// Consequently, a structure is immutable if its instances are immutable.\r\n// Immutable types naturally simplify code by limiting side-effects.\r\n// See some explanations on immutability and how NDepend supports it here:\r\n// http://codebetter.com/blogs/patricksmacchia/archive/2008/01/13/immutable-types-understand-them-and-use-them.aspx\r\n // <Name>Regression on immutable types</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE HasAttribute "OPTIONAL:NDepend.CQL.ImmutableAttribute" AND !IsImmutable\r\n\r\n// An object is immutable if its state doesn’t change once the object has been created. \r\n// Consequently, a class or a structure is immutable if its instances are immutable.\r\n// Immutable types naturally simplify code by limiting side-effects.\r\n// See some explanations on immutability and how NDepend supports it here:\r\n// http://codebetter.com/blogs/patricksmacchia/archive/2008/01/13/immutable-types-understand-them-and-use-them.aspx\r\n\r\n// NDepend.CQL.ImmutableAttribute is defined in the redistributable assembly $NDependInstallDir$\Lib\NDepend.CQL.dll\r\n// You can define your own attribute to tag 'immutable' types.\r\n\r\n // <Name>Regression on pure methods</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE \r\n HasAttribute "OPTIONAL:NDepend.CQL.PureAttribute" AND \r\n ( ChangesObjectState OR ChangesTypeState ) AND\r\n NbLinesOfCode > 0\r\n\r\n// A method is pure if its execution doesn’t change the value of any instance or static field. \r\n// Pure methods naturally simplify code by limiting side-effects.\r\n// See some explanations on immutability / purity and how NDepend supports it here:\r\n// http://codebetter.com/blogs/patricksmacchia/archive/2008/01/13/immutable-types-understand-them-and-use-them.aspx\r\n\r\n// NDepend.CQL.PureAttribute is defined in the redistributable assembly $NDependInstallDir$\Lib\NDepend.CQL.dll\r\n// You can define your own attribute to tag 'pure' methods.\r\n\r\n // <Name>Missing usage of ImmutableAttribute</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE !HasAttribute "OPTIONAL:NDepend.CQL.ImmutableAttribute" AND IsImmutable\r\n\r\n// Types matched by this query are immutable but are not tagged with the ImmutableAttribute.\r\n// The benefit of tagging them with the ImmutableAttribute is that the constraint 'Regression on immutable types' \r\n// will warn when the immutability of a type gets broken.\r\n\r\n// NDepend.CQL.ImmutableAttribute is defined in the redistributable assembly $NDependInstallDir$\Lib\NDepend.CQL.dll\r\n// You can define your own attribute to tag 'immutable' types.\r\n // <Name>Missing usage of PureAttribute</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE \r\n !HasAttribute "OPTIONAL:NDepend.CQL.PureAttribute" AND \r\n !ChangesObjectState AND !ChangesTypeState AND\r\n NbLinesOfCode > 0\r\n\r\n// Methods matched by this query are pure but are not tagged with the PureAttribute.\r\n// The benefit of tagging them with the PureAttribute is that the constraint 'Regression on pure methods'\r\n// will warn when the purity of a method gets broken.\r\n\r\n// NDepend.CQL.PureAttribute is defined in the redistributable assembly $NDependInstallDir$\Lib\NDepend.CQL.dll\r\n// You can define your own attribute to tag 'pure' methods. // <Name>Instance fields should be prefixed with a 'm_'</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 FIELDS WHERE \r\n !NameLike "^m_" AND \r\n !IsStatic AND \r\n !IsLiteral AND \r\n !IsGeneratedByCompiler AND \r\n !IsSpecialName AND \r\n !IsEventDelegateObject \r\n\r\n// This naming convention provokes debate.\r\n// Don't hesitate to customize the regex of NameLike to your preference. // <Name>Static fields should be prefixed with a 's_'</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 FIELDS WHERE \r\n !NameLike "^s_" AND \r\n IsStatic AND \r\n !IsLiteral AND \r\n !IsGeneratedByCompiler AND \r\n !IsSpecialName AND \r\n !IsEventDelegateObject \r\n\r\n// This naming convention provokes debate.\r\n// Don't hesitate to customize the regex of NameLike to your preference.\r\n // <Name>Interface name should begin with a 'I'</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE IsInterface AND !NameLike "^I" AND !IsNested AND !IsInFrameworkAssembly\r\n // <Name>Abstract base class should be suffixed with 'Base'</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE \r\n IsAbstract AND \r\n IsClass AND\r\n DepthOfInheritance == 1 AND // equivalent to: DepthOfDeriveFrom "System.Object" == 1\r\n !NameLike "Base$"\r\n // <Name>Exception class name should be suffixed with 'Exception'</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE IsExceptionClass AND !NameLike "Exception$" AND !IsInFrameworkAssembly\r\n// The name of an exception class should end with 'Exception'. // <Name>Attribute class name should be suffixed with 'Attribute'</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE IsAttributeClass AND !NameLike "Attribute$" AND !IsInFrameworkAssembly\r\n // <Name>Types name should begin with an Upper character</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE \r\n !NameLike "^[A-Z]" AND // The name of a type should begin with an Upper letter.\r\n !IsGeneratedByCompiler AND // Except if it is generated by compiler or ...\r\n !IsInFrameworkAssembly // ... if it is declared in a framework assembly. // <Name>Methods name should begin with an Upper character</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE \r\n !NameLike "^[A-Z]" AND \r\n !(IsClassConstructor OR IsConstructor OR \r\n IsPropertyGetter OR IsPropertySetter OR\r\n IsIndexerGetter OR IsIndexerSetter OR\r\n IsEventAdder OR IsEventRemover OR\r\n IsOperator) AND !IsGeneratedByCompiler AND !IsInFrameworkAssembly\r\n// The name of a regular method should begin with an Upper letter. // <Name>Do not name enum values 'Reserved'</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 FIELDS WHERE IsEnumValue AND NameLike "Reserved"\r\n\r\n// This rule assumes that an enumeration member with a name that contains "reserved" \r\n// is not currently used but is a placeholder to be renamed or removed in a future version.\r\n// Renaming or removing a member is a breaking change. You should not expect users to ignore\r\n// a member just because its name contains "reserved" nor can you rely on users to read or \r\n// abide by documentation. Furthermore, because reserved members appear in object browsers \r\n// and smart integrated development environments, they can cause confusion as to which members \r\n// are actually being used.\r\n\r\n// Instead of using a reserved member, add a new member to the enumeration in the future version.\r\n// In most cases, the addition of the new member is not a breaking change, as long as the \r\n// addition does not cause the values of the original members to change. // <Name>Type names should not match namespaces</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE \r\n NameIs "Collections" OR\r\n NameIs "Forms" OR\r\n NameIs "System" OR\r\n NameIs "UI"\r\n\r\n// Type names should not match the names of namespaces defined in the .NET Framework \r\n// class library. Violating this rule can reduce the usability of the library. // <Name>Avoid methods with name too long</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS \r\n WHERE NameLike "^[^\<\(]{35,}.*$" AND \r\n !IsExplicitInterfaceImpl AND !IsInFrameworkAssembly \r\n// The regex matches methods with name longer than 35 characters.\r\n// Method Name doesn't contain the type and namespace prefix, FullName does.\r\n// The regex computes the method name length from the beginning until the first open parenthesis or first lower than (for generic methods).\r\n// Explicit Interface Implementation methods are discarded because their names are prefixed with the interface name. // <Name>Avoid types with name too long</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE \r\n NameLike "^[^\<]{35,}.*$" AND \r\n !IsNested AND !IsInFrameworkAssembly \r\n// The regex matches types with name longer than 35 characters.\r\n// Type Name doesn't contain the namespace prefix, FullName does.\r\n// The regex computes the type name length from the beginning until the end or the first lower than (for generic types).\r\n// Nested types are discarded because their names are prefixed with outer type's name. // <Name>Avoid fields with name too long</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 FIELDS WHERE \r\n NameLike "^[^\<]{35,}.*$" AND \r\n !IsInFrameworkAssembly \r\n// The regex matches fields with name longer than 35 characters.\r\n// Field Name doesn't contain the type and namespace prefix, FullName does. // <Name>Mark ISerializable types with serializable</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES WHERE \r\n IsPublic AND !IsDelegate AND\r\n Implement "OPTIONAL:System.Runtime.Serialization.ISerializable" AND \r\n !HasAttribute "OPTIONAL:System.SerializableAttribute"\r\n\r\n// To be recognized by the CLR as serializable, types must be marked with the SerializableAttribute \r\n// attribute even if the type uses a custom serialization routine through implementation of the ISerializable interface. // <Name>Mark assemblies with assembly version</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE \r\n !HasAttribute "OPTIONAL:System.Reflection.AssemblyVersionAttribute" AND\r\n !IsFrameworkAssembly \r\n\r\n// The identity of an assembly is composed of the following information:\r\n// - Assembly name\r\n// - Version number\r\n// - Culture\r\n// - Public key (for strong-named assemblies).\r\n// The .NET Framework uses the version number to uniquely identify an assembly, \r\n// and to bind to types in strong-named assemblies. The version number is used \r\n// together with version and publisher policy. By default, applications run only \r\n// with the assembly version with which they were built. // <Name>Mark assemblies with CLSCompliant</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE \r\n !HasAttribute "OPTIONAL:System.CLSCompliantAttribute" AND\r\n !IsFrameworkAssembly \r\n\r\n// The Common Language Specification (CLS) defines naming restrictions, data types, \r\n// and rules to which assemblies must conform if they are to be used across programming languages.\r\n// Good design dictates that all assemblies explicitly indicate CLS compliance with \r\n// CLSCompliantAttribute. If the attribute is not present on an assembly, the assembly is not compliant. // <Name>Mark assemblies with ComVisible</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE \r\n !HasAttribute "OPTIONAL:System.Runtime.InteropServices.ComVisibleAttribute" AND\r\n !IsFrameworkAssembly \r\n\r\n// The ComVisibleAttribute attribute determines how COM clients access managed code. \r\n// Good design dictates that assemblies explicitly indicate COM visibility. \r\n// COM visibility can be set for an entire assembly and then overridden for individual \r\n// types and type members. If the attribute is not present, the contents of the assembly\r\n// are visible to COM clients. // <Name>Mark attributes with AttributeUsageAttribute</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE \r\nDeriveFrom "OPTIONAL:System.Attribute" AND\r\n!HasAttribute "OPTIONAL:System.AttributeUsageAttribute" AND\r\n!IsInFrameworkAssembly \r\n\r\n// When defining a custom attribute, mark it using AttributeUsageAttribute to \r\n// indicate where in the source code the custom attribute can be applied.\r\n// An attribute's meaning and intended usage will determine its valid locations \r\n// in code. For example, if you are defining an attribute that identifies the \r\n// person responsible for maintaining and enhancing each type in a library, \r\n// and responsibility is always assigned at the type level, compilers should \r\n// allow the attribute on classes, enumerations, and interfaces, but should \r\n// not allow it on methods, events, or properties. Organizational policies and\r\n// procedures would dictate whether the attribute should be allowed on assemblies. // <Name>Remove calls to GC.Collect()</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.GC.Collect()" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.GC.Collect(Int32)" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.GC.Collect(Int32,GCCollectionMode)"\r\n\r\n// It is preferrable to avoid calling GC.Collect() explicitely\r\n// in order to avoid some performance pitfall.\r\n// More in information on this here:\r\n// http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2004/11/29/271829.aspx // <Name>Don't call GC.Collect() without calling GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers()</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE\r\n (IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.GC.Collect()" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.GC.Collect(Int32)" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.GC.Collect(Int32,GCCollectionMode)") \r\n AND\r\n !IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers()" \r\n\r\n// It is preferrable to avoid calling GC.Collect() explicitely\r\n// in order to avoid some performance pitfall.\r\n// But if you wish to call GC.Collect(), you must do it this way:\r\n// GC.Collect();\r\n// GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();\r\n// GC.Collect();\r\n// To make sure that finalizer got executed, and object with finalizer got cleaned properly. // <Name>Enum Storage should be Int32</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT FIELDS WHERE \r\n NameIs "value__" AND \r\n !IsOfType "OPTIONAL:System.Int32" AND\r\n !IsInFrameworkAssembly\r\n\r\n// An enumeration is a value type that defines a set of related named constants. By default, \r\n// the System.Int32 data type is used to store the constant value. Even though you can change \r\n// this underlying type, it is not necessary or recommended for most scenarios. Note that there \r\n// is no significant performance gain in using a data type smaller than Int32. If you cannot \r\n// use the default data type, you should use one of the CLS-compliant integral types, Byte, \r\n// Int16, Int32, or Int64, to ensure that all of the enumeration's values are representable in \r\n// CLS-compliant programming languages. // <Name>Do not raise too general exception types</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE \r\n // The following exception types are too general to provide sufficient information to the user:\r\n ( ( DepthOfCreateA "OPTIONAL:System.Exception" == 1 OR \r\n DepthOfCreateA "OPTIONAL:System.ApplicationException" == 1 OR \r\n DepthOfCreateA "OPTIONAL:System.SystemException" == 1 )\r\n // Test for non-constructor, else this constraint would warn \r\n // on ctor of classes that derive from these exception types.\r\n AND !IsConstructor )\r\n // <Name>Do not raise reserved exception types</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE \r\n // The following exception types are reserved and should be thrown only by the Common Language Runtime:\r\n ( DepthOfCreateA "OPTIONAL:System.ExecutionEngineException" == 1 OR \r\n DepthOfCreateA "OPTIONAL:System.IndexOutOfRangeException" == 1 OR \r\n DepthOfCreateA "OPTIONAL:System.NullReferenceException" == 1 OR\r\n DepthOfCreateA "OPTIONAL:System.OutOfMemoryException" == 1 OR\r\n DepthOfCreateA "OPTIONAL:System.StackOverflowException" == 1 OR \r\n DepthOfCreateA "OPTIONAL:System.InvalidProgramException" == 1 OR \r\n DepthOfCreateA "OPTIONAL:System.AccessViolationException" == 1 OR\r\n DepthOfCreateA "OPTIONAL:System.CannotUnloadAppDomainException" == 1 OR\r\n DepthOfCreateA "OPTIONAL:System.BadImageFormatException" == 1 OR \r\n DepthOfCreateA "OPTIONAL:System.DataMisalignedException" == 1 )\r\n // <Name>Use integral or string argument for indexers</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE \r\nIsIndexerGetter AND \r\n !( NameIs "get_Item(String)" OR \r\n NameLike "get_Item\(Int" OR \r\n NameLike "get_Item\(Byte" OR\r\n NameLike "get_Item\(SByte" )\r\n\r\n// Indexers, that is, indexed properties, should use integer or string types for the index. \r\n// These types are typically used for indexing data structures and increase the usability of \r\n// the library. Use of the Object type should be restricted to those cases where the specific \r\n// integer or string type cannot be specified at design time. If the design requires other \r\n// types for the index, reconsider whether the type represents a logical data store. If it \r\n// does not represent a logical data store, use a method. // <Name>Uri fields should be of type System.Uri</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT FIELDS WHERE \r\n (NameLike "Uri$" OR NameLike "Url$") AND !IsOfType "OPTIONAL:System.Uri"\r\n\r\n// A field which name end with 'Uri' is deemed as representing a uri.\r\n// Such field should be of type System.Uri. // <Name>Types should not extend System.ApplicationException</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE\r\n DepthOfDeriveFrom "OPTIONAL:System.ApplicationException" == 1 AND\r\n !IsInFrameworkAssembly\r\n\r\n// For .NET Framework version 1, it was recommended to derive new exceptions from ApplicationException. \r\n// The recommendation has changed and new exceptions should derive from System.Exception or one of its \r\n// subclasses in the System namespace. // <Name>Don't use .NET 1.x HashTable and ArrayList</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE\r\n\r\n // Prefer using the class System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<K,V> over System.Collections.HashTable.\r\n CreateA "OPTIONAL:System.Collections.HashTable" OR\r\n\r\n // Prefer using the class System.Collections.Generic.List<T> over System.Collections.ArrayList.\r\n CreateA "OPTIONAL:System.Collections.ArrayList"\r\n\r\n// You can be forced to use HashTable or ArrayList \r\n// because if you are using tier code that requires working with these classes\r\n// or because you are coding with .NET 1.x. // <Name>Caution with List.Contains()</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE \r\nIsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Collections.Generic.List<T>.Contains(T)" OR\r\nIsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Collections.Generic.IList<T>.Contains(T)" OR\r\nIsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Collections.ArrayList.Contains(Object)"\r\n\r\n// The cost of checking if a list contains an object is proportional to the size of the list (O(N) operation).\r\n// For large lists and/or frequent calls to Contains(), prefer using the System.Collections.Generic.HashSet<T> class \r\n// where calls to Contains() takes a constant time (O(0) operation). // <Name>Prefer return collection abstraction instead of implementation</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE \r\n ReturnTypeIs "OPTIONAL:System.Collections.Generic.List<T>" OR \r\n ReturnTypeIs "OPTIONAL:System.Collections.Generic.HashSet<T>" OR\r\n ReturnTypeIs "OPTIONAL:System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<TKey,TValue>"\r\n\r\n// Most of the time, clients of a method doesn't need to know the exact implementation of the collection returned.\r\n// It is preferrable to return a collection interface such as IList<T>, ICollection<T> or IEnumerable<T>. // <Name>P/Invokes should be static and not be visible</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE\r\n !IsInFrameworkAssembly AND\r\n (HasAttribute "OPTIONAL:System.Runtime.InteropServices.DllImportAttribute") AND\r\n ( IsPublic OR \r\n !IsStatic)\r\n\r\n// Methods marked with the DllImportAttribute attribute (or methods defined using the \r\n// Declare keyword in Visual Basic) use Platform Invocation Services to access unmanaged \r\n// code. Such methods should not be exposed. Keeping these methods private or internal \r\n// ensures that your library cannot be used to breach security by allowing callers access \r\n// to unmanaged APIs they could not call otherwise. // <Name>Move P/Invokes to NativeMethods class</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE\r\n !IsInFrameworkAssembly AND\r\n HasAttribute "OPTIONAL:System.Runtime.InteropServices.DllImportAttribute" AND\r\n !FullNameLike "NativeMethods."\r\n\r\n// Platform Invocation methods, such as those marked with the System.Runtime.InteropServices.DllImportAttribute \r\n// attribute, or methods defined by using the Declare keyword in Visual Basic, access unmanaged code. \r\n// These methods should be in one of the following classes:\r\n//\r\n// - NativeMethods - This class does not suppress stack walks for unmanaged code permission. \r\n// (System.Security.SuppressUnmanagedCodeSecurityAttribute must not be applied to this class.) \r\n// This class is for methods that can be used anywhere because a stack walk will be performed.\r\n//\r\n// - SafeNativeMethods - This class suppresses stack walks for unmanaged code permission. \r\n// (System.Security.SuppressUnmanagedCodeSecurityAttribute is applied to this class.) \r\n// This class is for methods that are safe for anyone to call. Callers of these methods are not \r\n// required to do a full security review to ensure that the usage is secure because the methods\r\n// are harmless for any caller.\r\n//\r\n// - UnsafeNativeMethods - This class suppresses stack walks for unmanaged code permission. \r\n// (System.Security.SuppressUnmanagedCodeSecurityAttribute is applied to this class.) \r\n// This class is for methods that are potentially dangerous. Any caller of these methods must do\r\n// a full security review to ensure that the usage is secure because no stack walk will be performed.\r\n // <Name>NativeMethods class should be static and internal</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE\r\n !IsInFrameworkAssembly AND\r\n ( NameIs "NativeMethods" OR\r\n NameIs "SafeNativeMethods" OR\r\n NameIs "UnsafeNativeMethods") AND\r\n IsPublic OR\r\n !IsStatic \r\n\r\n// Native Methods' classes are declared as internal (Friend, in Visual Basic) and static.\r\n // <Name>Method non-synchronized that read mutable states</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS WHERE \r\n (ReadsMutableObjectState OR ReadsMutableTypeState) AND \r\n !IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Monitor" AND \r\n !IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.ReaderWriterLock"\r\n\r\n// Mutable object states are instance fields that can be modifed throught the lifetime of the object.\r\n// Mutable type states are static fields that can be modifed throught the lifetime of the program.\r\n// This query lists methods that read mutable state without synchronizing access.\r\n// In the case of multi-threaded program, doing so can lead to state corruption. // <Name>Don't create threads explicitely</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE \r\n CreateA "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Thread"\r\n\r\n// Prefer using the thread pool instead of creating manually your own thread.\r\n// Threads are costly objects. \r\n// They take approximately 200,000 cycles to create and about 100,000 cycles to destroy. \r\n// By default they reserve 1 megabyte of virtual memory for its stack and use 2,000-8,000 cycles for each context switch.\r\n// As a consequence, it is preferrable to let the thread pool recycle threads.\r\n\r\n// Creating custom thread can also be the sign of flawed design, where tasks and threads have affinity.\r\n// It is preferrable to code tasks that can be ran on any thread. // <Name>Don't use Thread.Sleep()</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(Int32)"\r\n\r\n// Usage of Thread.Sleep() is a sign of flawed design.\r\n// More information on this here:\r\n// http://msmvps.com/blogs/peterritchie/archive/2007/04/26/thread-sleep-is-a-sign-of-a-poorly-designed-program.aspx\r\n // <Name>Don't use Thread.Abort()</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE \r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Thread.Abort()" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Thread.Abort(Object)" \r\n\r\n// Usage of Thread.Abort() is dangerous.\r\n// More information on this here:\r\n// http://www.interact-sw.co.uk/iangblog/2004/11/12/cancellation // <Name>Monitor Enter/Exit must be both called within the same method</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Monitor.Enter(Object)" AND\r\n !IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Monitor.Exit(Object)" // <Name>Monitor TryEnter/Exit must be both called within the same method</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE\r\n ( IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Monitor.Enter(Object)" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Monitor.TryEnter(Object,Int32)" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Monitor.TryEnter(Object,TimeSpan)") AND\r\n !IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Monitor.Exit(Object)" // <Name>ReaderWriterLock AcquireReaderLock/ReleaseLock must be both called within the same method</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE\r\n ( IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.ReaderWriterLock.AcquireReaderLock(Int32)" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.ReaderWriterLock.AcquireReaderLock(TimeSpan)" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Monitor.TryEnter(Object,TimeSpan)") \r\nAND\r\n !( IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.ReaderWriterLock.ReleaseReaderLock()" OR \r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.ReaderWriterLock.ReleaseLock()") // <Name>ReaderWriterLock AcquireWriterLock/ReleaseLock must be both called within the same method</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE\r\n ( IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.ReaderWriterLock.AcquireWriterLock(Int32)" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.ReaderWriterLock.AcquireWriterLock(TimeSpan)" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Monitor.TryEnter(Object,TimeSpan)") \r\nAND\r\n !( IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.ReaderWriterLock.ReleaseWriterLock()" OR \r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.ReaderWriterLock.ReleaseLock()") // <Name>Method should not return concrete XmlNode</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE \r\n( ReturnTypeIs "OPTIONAL:System.Xml.XmlDocument" OR \r\n ReturnTypeIs "OPTIONAL:System.Xml.XmlAttribute" OR \r\n ReturnTypeIs "OPTIONAL:System.Xml.XmlDocumentFragment" OR \r\n ReturnTypeIs "OPTIONAL:System.Xml.XmlEntity" OR \r\n ReturnTypeIs "OPTIONAL:System.Xml.XmlLinkedNode" OR \r\n ReturnTypeIs "OPTIONAL:System.Xml.XmlNotation" OR\r\n ReturnTypeIs "OPTIONAL:System.Xml.XmlNode" )\r\n\r\n// The class System.Xml.XmlNode implements the interface System.Xml.Xpath.IXPathNavigable.\r\n// It is preferrable to return this interface instead of a concrete class.\r\n // <Name>Types should not extend System.Xml.XmlDocument</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE DepthOfDeriveFrom "OPTIONAL:System.Xml.XmlDocument" == 1\r\n\r\n// Do not create a subclass of XmlDocument if you want to create an XML view of an underlying object model or data source. // <Name>Most used types (TypeRank)</Name>\r\nSELECT TOP 50 TYPES ORDER BY TypeRank DESC\r\n// TypeRank values are computed by applying the Google PageRank \r\n// algorithm on the graph of types' dependencies \r\n// Types with high Rank are the most used ones.\r\n// See the definition of the TypeRank metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#TypeRank // <Name>Most used methods (MethodRank)</Name>\r\nSELECT TOP 50 METHODS ORDER BY MethodRank DESC\r\n// MethodRank values are computed by applying the Google PageRank \r\n// algorithm on the graph of methods' dependencies\r\n// Methods with high Rank are the most used ones.\r\n// See the definition of the MethodRank metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#MethodRank // <Name>Most used namespaces (NamespaceCa)</Name>\r\nSELECT TOP 50 NAMESPACES ORDER BY NamespaceCa DESC\r\n// The Afferent Coupling for a particular namespace is the number of namespaces that depends directly on it.\r\n// Namespaces with high Ca are the most used ones.\r\n// See the definition of the NamespaceCa metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NamespaceCa // <Name>Most used types (TypeCa)</Name>\r\nSELECT TOP 50 TYPES ORDER BY TypeCa DESC\r\n// The Afferent Coupling for a particular type is the number of types that depends directly on it.\r\n// Types with high Ca are the most used ones.\r\n// See the definition of the TypeCa metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#TypeCa // <Name>Most used methods (MethodCa)</Name>\r\nSELECT TOP 50 METHODS ORDER BY MethodCa DESC\r\n// The Afferent Coupling for a particular method is the number of methods that depends directly on it.\r\n// Methods with high Ca are the most used ones\r\n// See the definition of the MethodCa metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#MethodCa // <Name>Namespaces that use many other namespaces (NamespaceCe)</Name>\r\nSELECT TOP 50 NAMESPACES ORDER BY NamespaceCe DESC\r\n// The Efferent Coupling for a particular namespace is the number of namespaces it directly depends on.\r\n// Namespaces declared in Framework assemblies are taken account.\r\n// See the definition of the NamespaceCe metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NamespaceCe // <Name>Types that use many other types (TypeCe)</Name>\r\nSELECT TOP 50 TYPES ORDER BY TypeCe DESC\r\n// The Efferent Coupling for a particular type is the number of types it directly depends on.\r\n// Types declared in Framework assemblies are taken account.\r\n// See the definition of the TypeCe metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#TypeCe // <Name>Methods that use many other methods (MethodCe)</Name>\r\nSELECT TOP 50 METHODS ORDER BY MethodCe DESC\r\n// The Efferent Coupling for a particular method is the number of methods it directly depends on.\r\n// Methods declared in Framework assemblies are taken account.\r\n// See the definition of the MethodCe metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#MethodCe // <Name>High-level to low-level assemblies (AssemblyLevel)</Name>\r\nSELECT ASSEMBLIES ORDER BY AssemblyLevel DESC\r\n// Classify assemblies by their Level values.\r\n// See the definition of the AssemblyLevel metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#Level // <Name>High-level to low-level namespaces (NamespaceLevel)</Name>\r\nSELECT NAMESPACES ORDER BY NamespaceLevel DESC\r\n// Classify namespaces by their Level values.\r\n// See the definition of the NamespaceLevel metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#Level // <Name>High-level to low-level types (TypeLevel)</Name>\r\nSELECT TYPES ORDER BY TypeLevel DESC\r\n// Classify types by their Level values.\r\n// See the definition of the TypeLevel metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#Level // <Name>High-level to low-level methods (MethodLevel)</Name>\r\nSELECT METHODS ORDER BY MethodLevel DESC\r\n// Classify methods by their Level values.\r\n// See the definition of the MethodLevel metric here http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#Level // <Name>Check that the assembly Asm1 is not using the assembly Asm2</Name>\r\n\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE \r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:ASSEMBLY:Asm2" AND\r\n NameIs "Asm1"\r\n // The OPTIONAL: prefix is just use to avoid an error because there is currently no assembly named Asm2.\r\n // <Name>Check that the namespace N1.N2 is not using the namespace N3.N4.N5</Name>\r\n\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT NAMESPACES WHERE \r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:ASSEMBLY:N3.N4.N5" AND\r\n NameIs "N1.N2"\r\n // The OPTIONAL: prefix is just use to avoid an error because there is currently no namespace named N3.N4.N5.\r\n // <Name>Check that the assembly Asm1 is only using the assemblies Asm2, Asm3 or mscorlib</Name>\r\n\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE \r\n ( !IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:ASSEMBLY:Asm2" OR\r\n !IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:ASSEMBLY:Asm3" OR\r\n !IsDirectlyUsing "ASSEMBLY:mscorlib" OR\r\n AsmCe != 3) // Must not be used more than 3 assemblies \r\n // AsmCe = Efferent Coupling for assembly\r\nAND \r\n NameIs "Asm1"\r\n // The OPTIONAL: prefix is just use to avoid an error because there is currently no assembly named Asm2 or Asm3.\r\n // <Name>Check that the namespace N1.N2 is only using the namespaces N3.N4, N5 or System</Name>\r\n\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE \r\n ( !IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:NAMESPACE:N3.N4" OR\r\n !IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:NAMESPACE:N5" OR\r\n !IsDirectlyUsing "NAMESPACE:System" OR\r\n AsmCe != 3) // Must not be used more than 3 assemblies \r\n // AsmCe = Efferent Coupling for assembly\r\nAND \r\n NameIs "Asm1"\r\n // The OPTIONAL: prefix is just use to avoid an error because there is currently no namespace named N3.N4 or N5.\r\n // <Name>Check that AsmDrawing is the only assembly that is using System.Drawing</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count> 0 IN SELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE \r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:ASSEMBLY:System.Drawing" AND\r\n !NameIs "AsmDrawing"\r\n\r\n// The OPTIONAL: prefix is just use to avoid an error because System.Drawing might not be currently referenced.\r\n // <Name>Check that only 3 assemblies are using System.Drawing</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 3 IN SELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE \r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:ASSEMBLY:System.Drawing"\r\n\r\n// The OPTIONAL: prefix is just use to avoid an error because System.Drawing might not be currently referenced.\r\n // <Name>Check that all methods that call Foo.Fct1() also call Foo.Fct2(Int32)</Name>\r\n\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT METHODS WHERE \r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:Foo.Fct1()" AND\r\n !IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:Foo.Fct2(Int32)"\r\n // The OPTIONAL: prefix is just use to avoid an error because there is currently no methods named Foo.Fct1() or Foo.Fct2(Int32) // <Name>Check that all types that derive from Foo, also implement IFoo</Name>\r\n\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE \r\n DeriveFrom "OPTIONAL:TYPE:Foo" AND\r\n !Implement "OPTIONAL:TYPE:IFoo"\r\n // The OPTIONAL: prefix is just use to avoid an error because there is currently no class named Foo and no interface named IFoo // <Name>Check that all types that has the attribute FooAttribute are declared in the namespace N1.N2</Name>\r\n\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES \r\n OUT OF NAMESPACES "OPTIONAL:N1.N2" \r\n WHERE \r\n HasAttribute "OPTIONAL:FooAttribute"\r\n\r\n // The OPTIONAL: prefix is just use to avoid an error because there is currently no attribute class named FooAttribute and no namespace named N1.N2 // <Name>Check that all synchronization objects are only used from the namespaces under MyNamespace.Sync</Name>\r\n\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT NAMESPACES \r\n WHERE \r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Monitor" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.ReaderWriterLock" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Mutex" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.EventWaitHandle" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Semaphore" OR\r\n IsDirectlyUsing "OPTIONAL:System.Threading.Interlocked" \r\n AND !NameLike "^MyNamespace.Sync"\r\n\r\n // The OPTIONAL: prefix is just use to avoid an error because there some code elemnts might not currently exists. // <Name>Check that the graph of namespaces dependencies of the assembly Asm is acyclic</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE \r\n NameIs "OPTIONAL:Asm" AND\r\n ContainsNamespaceDependencyCycle\r\n // The OPTIONAL: prefix is just use to avoid an error because there is currently no assembly named Asm // <Name>From now, all methods added or refactored should respect basic quality principles</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 METHODS WHERE \r\n\r\n // Metrics' definitions\r\n ( NbLinesOfCode > 30 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbLinesOfCode\r\n NbILInstructions > 200 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbILInstructions\r\n CyclomaticComplexity > 20 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#CC\r\n ILCyclomaticComplexity > 50 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#ILCC\r\n ILNestingDepth > 4 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#ILNestingDepth\r\n NbParameters > 5 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbParameters\r\n NbVariables > 8 OR // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbVariables\r\n NbOverloads > 6 ) // http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#NbOverloads\r\n\r\n AND (WasAdded OR CodeWasChanged)\r\n\r\n// This constraint warns if a method with low-quality has been added or refactored.\r\n// With NDepend and such constraint, you can Ensure Quality From Now! as explained here:\r\n// http://codebetter.com/blogs/patricksmacchia/archive/2008/01/01/ensure-the-quality-of-the-code-that-will-be-developed-this-year.aspx\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Analysis Comparison // <Name>From now, all types added or refactored should respect basic quality principles</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE \r\n // These metrics' definitions are available here: http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#MetricsOnMethods\r\n ( NbMethods > 20 OR\r\n (NbFields > 20 AND !IsEnumeration) OR\r\n (LCOMHS > 0.95 AND NbFields > 10 AND NbMethods > 10) OR\r\n TypeCe > 50 ) \r\n AND (WasAdded OR CodeWasChanged)\r\n\r\n// This constraint warns if a type with low-quality has been added or refactored.\r\n// With NDepend and such constraint, you can Ensure Quality From Now! as explained here:\r\n// http://codebetter.com/blogs/patricksmacchia/archive/2008/01/01/ensure-the-quality-of-the-code-that-will-be-developed-this-year.aspx\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Analysis Comparison // <Name>From now, all methods added or refactored should be 100% covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TOP 10 TYPES WHERE \r\n // These metrics' definitions are available here: http://www.ndepend.com/Metrics.aspx#MetricsOnMethods\r\n PercentageCoverage < 100\r\n AND (WasAdded OR CodeWasChanged)\r\n\r\n// This constraint warns if a method has been added or refactored and hasn't been 100% covered by tests.\r\n// With NDepend and such constraint, you can Ensure Quality From Now! as explained here:\r\n// http://codebetter.com/blogs/patricksmacchia/archive/2008/01/01/ensure-the-quality-of-the-code-that-will-be-developed-this-year.aspx\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly 2 analysis must be compared.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Start Page -> Compare 2 versions of a code base\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Analysis Comparison\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx // <Name>Check that the assembly Asm is 100% covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT ASSEMBLIES WHERE \r\nNameIs "Asm" AND PercentageCoverage < 100\r\n\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx\r\n\r\n // <Name>Check that the namespace N1.N2 is 100% covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT NAMESPACES WHERE \r\nNameIs "N1.N2" AND PercentageCoverage < 100\r\n\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx\r\n\r\n // <Name>Check that the class Namespace.Foo is 100% covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE \r\nFullNameIs "Namespace.Foo" AND PercentageCoverage < 100\r\n\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx\r\n\r\n // <Name>Check that the class Namespace.Foo.Method(Int32) is 100% covered by tests</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE \r\nFullNameIs "Namespace.Foo.Method(Int32)" AND PercentageCoverage < 100\r\n\r\n\r\n// To run this constraint properly coverage data must be gathered from NCover™ or Visual Studio™ Coverage.\r\n// This can be done in VisualNDepend throught the menu: Coverage -> Import Coverage Files\r\n// This can be done at analysis time throught the menu: Project Properties -> Analysis -> Code Coverage\r\n// More information on how to import coverage data here:\r\n// http://www.ndepend.com/Coverage.aspx\r\n\r\n // <Name>Check that all types that derive from Foo, has a name that ends up with Foo</Name>\r\n\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT TYPES WHERE \r\n DeriveFrom "OPTIONAL:TYPE:Foo" AND\r\n !NameLike "Foo$"\r\n // The OPTIONAL: prefix is just use to avoid an error because there is currently no class named Foo // <Name>Check that all namespaces begins with CompanyName.ProductName</Name>\r\nWARN IF Count > 0 IN SELECT NAMESPACES WHERE \r\n !NameLike "^CompanyName.ProductName"\r\n AND !IsInFrameworkAssembly