# Bogus [![build status](https://secure.travis-ci.org/psyho/bogus.png)](http://travis-ci.org/psyho/bogus) [![Code Climate](https://codeclimate.com/badge.png)](https://codeclimate.com/github/psyho/bogus) ## What is Bogus? Bogus aims to make your unit tests more reliable by ensuring that you don't stub or mock methods that don't actually exist in the mocked objects. ## What are fakes? Fakes are alternative implementations of classes for testing purposes. In most cases, fakes are just named stubs: they don't implement the logic (otherwise they should be tested too), but they have the same interface as the real object and they make it easier to remove duplication in your stubs. ## Stubs and mocks scatter the interface specification all over your specs Let's assume that you have a couple of classes that share a collaborator. In this case we have a finds_users object that allows finding users by location and suggests_followings and lists_users_near_city that use it in turn to compute a list of users that match some criteria. ```ruby class FindsUsers takes :users_repository def near_point(location, distance_in_km); # do something with users_repository and return a list of users end end class Geocoder takes :http_client def location_for(address) # do something to http_client and return location end end class SuggestsFollowings takes :finds_users def suggestions_for(user) finds_users.near_point(user.location, 50).select{|user| user.followers_count > 10} end end class ListsUsersNearCity takes :finds_users, :geocoder def users(city) city_location = geocoder.location_for(city.name) finds_users.near_point(city_location, 10) end end ``` Typically, when testing SuggestsFollowings and ListsUsersNearCity you'd have code like this in your specs: ```ruby describe SuggestsFollowings let(:finds_users) { stub(:finds_users) } let(:user) { new_user } subject { SuggestsFollowings.new(finds_users) } it "returns users with follower count of 10 or more" do user_with_followers = new_user(followers_count: 10) users = [new_user(followers_count: 5), user_with_followers] finds_users.should_receive(:near_point).with(user.location, 50).and_return(users) subject.suggestions_for(user).should == [user_with_followers] end # ... end describe ListsUsersNearCity let(:finds_users) { stub(:finds_users) } let(:geocoder) { stub(:geocoder) } let(:city) { new_city(name: "New York") } subject { ListsUsersNearCity.new(finds_users, geocoder) } it "returns users near center of the city" do location = Location.new(1, 2) users = [new_user, new_user] geocoder.should_receive(:location_for).with("New York").and_return(location) finds_users.should_receive(:near_point).with(location, 10).and_return(users) subject.users(city).should == users end # ... end ``` Notice how the stubbing/mocking code is duplicated between both specs. This might not be a huge problem in a small project, but as your codebase grows, there might be more and more objects that interact with finds_users, and the more objects interact with finds_users, the more places it's interface is specified in using stubbing or mock expectations. ## Bogus to the rescue! Bogus is aimed to help you remove duplication in specifying interfaces from your specs. It will reduce the need for integration testing, because with Bogus, you make sure that the test doubles you use have the same interface as the real object, while still allowing you to test in isolation and benefit from that. So how would your tests look like if you used Bogus? ```ruby require 'bogus/rspec' Bogus.configure do |config| config.spy_by_default = true config.stub_dsl = :rr # only :rr available for now end shared_context 'fakes' do fake(:geocoder) # same as let(:geocoder) { Bogus.fake_for(:geocoder) } fake(:finds_users) end describe SuggestsFollowings include_context "fakes" let(:user) { new_user } subject { SuggestsFollowings.new(finds_users) } it "returns users with follower count of 10 or more" do user_with_followers = new_user(followers_count: 10) users = [new_user(followers_count: 5), user_with_followers] # this will actually fail if FindsUsers does not have a near_point method # that takes 2 arguments mock(finds_users).near_point(user.location, 50) { users } subject.suggestions_for(user).should == [user_with_followers] end # ... end describe ListsUsersNearCity include_context "fakes" let(:city) { new_city(name: "New York") } subject { ListsUsersNearCity.new(finds_users, geocoder) } it "returns users near center of the city" do location = Location.new(1, 2) users = [new_user, new_user] mock(geocoder).location_for("New York") { location } mock(finds_users).near_point(location, 10) { users } subject.users(city).should == users end # ... end ``` As you can see, by using Bogus you can keep writing truly isolated unit tests just like you are used to, but with higher degree of security, because Bogus makes sure, that the methods you are stubbing actually exist and take same arguments. ## Bogus and commands By default, fakes created by Bogus are nil-objects. This is particularly useful when dealing with "command" methods or if you follow the "tell, don't ask" principle. ```ruby class SendsEmailNotifications def notify_password_changed(user) # do something end end class Logger def info(*message) end end class ChangesPassword takes :sends_email_notifications, :logger def change_password(user, old_pass, new_pass) # change user password user.password = new_pass if user.password == old_pass # notify by email sends_email_notifications.notify_password_changed(user) # and log logger.info("User", user.name, "changed password") end end describe ChangesPassword do fake(:sends_email_notifications) fake(:logger) let(:user) { new_user } subject{ ChangesPassword.new(sends_email_notifications, logger) } it "sends the email notification" do subject.change_password(user, 'old', 'new') # no need to set up the stub on sends_email_notifications for this to work sends_email_notifications.should have_received.notify_password_changed(user) end end ``` The beautiful thing is, that even if you don't care about testing something (like logging in this example), you still get the benefit of ensuring that the interface matches, even in a fully isolated test. ## Contract tests Knowing that a method exists and takes the right number of parameters is great, but why stop there? Bogus can also make sure that the interface you stub is actually tested somewhere with the correct arguments and return value. ```ruby describe ChangesPassword do fake(:sends_email_notifications) fake(:logger) let(:user) { new_user } subject{ ChangesPassword.new(sends_email_notifications, logger) } it "sends the email notification" do subject.change_password(user, 'old', 'new') sends_email_notifications.should have_received.notify_password_changed(user) end end ``` In the above spec, SendsEmailNotifications#notify_password_changed is specified as a method that takes a user as an argument. Thanks to Bogus, we already know that there is a class named SendsEmailNotifications and it has a #notify_password_changed method that takes one argument. But how can we be sure that this argument is a User, and not a String for example? Here's how Bogus can help with this problem: ```ruby describe SendsEmailNotifications do verify_contract(:sends_email_notifications) let(:sends_email_notifications) { SendsEmailNotifications.new } it "send email notifications" do user = new_user sends_email_notifications.notify_password_changed(user) # ... end end ``` ## License MIT. See the LICENSE file. ## TODO: This is a README driven project, so don't expect stuff in the README to be implemented ;P See the features directory for the completed functionality. ## Authors * [Adam Pohorecki](http://github.com/psyho) * [Paweł Pierzchała](http://github.com/wrozka) * [Marek Nowak](https://github.com/yundt)