![RSpec Status](https://github.com/khamusa/rspec-graphql_matchers/actions/workflows/rspec.yml/badge.svg) # Rspec::GraphqlMatchers Convenient rspec matchers for testing your [graphql-ruby](https://github.com/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby) API/Schema. ## Installation ``` gem 'rspec-graphql_matchers' ``` ## Usage The matchers currently supported are: - `expect(a_graphql_object).to have_a_field(field_name).of_type(valid_type)` - `expect(a_graphql_object).to implement(interface_name, ...)` - `expect(a_mutation_type).to have_a_return_field(field_name).returning(valid_type)` - `expect(a_mutation_type).to have_an_input_field(field_name).of_type(valid_type)` - `expect(a_field).to be_of_type(valid_type)` - `expect(an_input).to accept_argument(argument_name).of_type(valid_type)` Where `valid_type` is a your type signature as a String: `"String!"`, `"Int!"`, `"[String]!"` (note the exclamation mark at the end, as required by the [GraphQL specifications](http://graphql.org/). Please note that using references to type instances is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. ## Examples Given a GraphQL object defined as ```ruby class PostType < GraphQL::Schema::Object graphql_name "Post" description "A blog post" implements GraphQL::Types::Relay::Node field :id, ID, null: false field :comments, [String], null: false field :isPublished, Boolean, null: true field :published, Boolean, null: false, deprecation_reason: 'Use isPublished instead' field :subposts, PostType, null: true do argument :filter, String, required: false argument :id, ID, required: false argument :isPublished, Boolean, required: false end end ``` ### 1) Test your type defines the correct fields: ```ruby describe PostType do subject { described_class } it { is_expected.to have_field(:id).of_type("ID!") } it { is_expected.to have_field(:comments).of_type("[String!]!") } it { is_expected.to have_field(:isPublished).of_type("Boolean") } # Check a field is deprecated it { is_expected.to have_field(:published).with_deprecation_reason } it { is_expected.to have_field(:published).with_deprecation_reason('Use isPublished instead') } it { is_expected.not_to have_field(:published).with_deprecation_reason('Wrong reason') } it { is_expected.not_to have_field(:isPublished).with_deprecation_reason } # The gem automatically converts field names to CamelCase, so this will # pass even though the field was defined as field :isPublished it { is_expected.to have_field(:is_published).of_type("Boolean") } end ``` ### 2) Test a specific field type with `be_of_type` matcher: ```ruby describe PostType do describe 'id' do subject { PostType.fields['id'] } it { is_expected.to be_of_type('ID!') } it { is_expected.not_to be_of_type('Float!') } end describe 'subposts' do subject { PostType.fields['subposts'] } it { is_expected.to be_of_type('Post') } end end ``` ### 3) Test the arguments accepted by a field with `accept_argument` matcher: ```ruby describe PostType do describe 'subposts' do subject { PostType.fields['subposts'] } it 'accepts a filter and an id argument, of types String and ID' do expect(subject).to accept_argument(:filter).of_type('String') expect(subject).to accept_argument(:id).of_type('ID') end it { is_expected.not_to accept_argument(:weirdo) } # The gem automatically converts argument names to CamelCase, so this will # pass even though the argument was defined as :isPublished it { is_expected.to accept_argument(:is_published).of_type("Boolean") } end end ``` ### 4) Test an object's interface implementations: ```ruby describe PostType do subject { described_class } it 'implements interface Node' do expect(subject).to implement('Node') end it { is_expected.not_to implement('OtherInterface') } end ``` ### 5) Using camelize: false on field names By default the graphql gem camelizes field names. This gem deals with it transparently: ```ruby class ObjectMessingWithCamelsAndSnakesType < GraphQL::Schema::Object graphql_name 'ObjectMessingWithCamelsAndSnakes' implements GraphQL::Types::Relay::Node field :me_gusta_los_camellos, ID, null: false # note the camelize: false field :prefiero_serpientes, ID, null: false, camelize: false end ``` The following specs demonstrate the current behavior of the gem regarding fields: ```ruby describe ObjectMessingWithCamelsAndSnakesType do subject { described_class } # For a field name that was automatically camelized, you can add expectations # against both versions and we handle it transparently: it { is_expected.to have_a_field(:meGustaLosCamellos) } it { is_expected.to have_a_field(:me_gusta_los_camellos) } # However, when using camelize: false, you have to use the exact case of the field definition: it { is_expected.to have_a_field(:prefiero_serpientes) } it { is_expected.not_to have_a_field(:prefieroSerpientes) } # Note we're using `not_to` end ``` This behaviour is currently active only on field name matching. PRs are welcome to reproduce it to arguments as well. ## TODO - New matchers! ## Contributing - Send Bug reports, suggestions or any general question through the [Issue tracker](https://github.com/khamusa/rspec-graphql_matchers/issues). Think of another matcher that could be useful? This is the place to ask, or... - Pull requests are welcome through the usual procedure: fork the project, commit your changes and open the [PR](https://github.com/khamusa/rspec-graphql_matchers/pulls). This project is intended to be a safe, welcoming space for collaboration, and contributors are expected to adhere to the [Contributor Covenant](http://contributor-covenant.org) code of conduct. ## License The gem is available as open source under the terms of the [MIT License](http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT).