# dbview_cti [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/mvdamme/dbview_cti.png)](https://travis-ci.org/mvdamme/dbview_cti) This gem implements [Class Table Inheritance](http://martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/classTableInheritance.html) (CTI) for Rails, as an alternative to Single Table Inheritance (STI). The implementation is based on database views. It allows you to combine polymorphism with database foreign key constraints. Currently, only PostgreSQL (version >= 9.1) is supported. The gem supports Rails 3.2, 4.0, 4.1, 4.2 and 5.0 apps running on MRI (>= 1.9.3), Rubinius and JRuby in 1.9 mode. ## Installation Add the following to your Gemfile: ```ruby gem 'dbview_cti' ``` ## Example Suppose we would like to have the following class hierarchy: a Vehicle superclass, its subclass MotorVehicle, and Car and MotorCycle wich are subclasses of MotorVehicle: ```ruby class Vehicle < ActiveRecord::Base end class MotorVehicle < Vehicle end class Car < MotorVehicle end class MotorCycle < MotorVehicle end ``` With Class Table Inheritance, we use a separate database table for each class. Each table only stores the attributes that are specific to that class. dbview_cti uses database views to combine attributes from several tables in the hierarchy in an almost transparent way, so the resulting objects behave like normal ActiveRecord models (with a few exceptions). In order to do this dbview_cti has to know all descendants of a class, so we modify our class definitions: ```ruby class Vehicle < ActiveRecord::Base cti_base_class end class MotorVehicle < Vehicle cti_derived_class end class Car < MotorVehicle cti_derived_class end class MotorCycle < MotorVehicle cti_derived_class end ``` In the base class in the hierarchy (Vehicle in this case), we add a call to `cti_base_class`, in all derived classes we add `cti_derived_class`. It is important to add these before running any migrations for the models, otherwise the database views won't be generated correctly (it is always possible to have them regenerated, see further). Now it's time to create the database tables (and views) using Rails migrations. The table for the base class is created using a standard migration, e.g. ```ruby class CreateVehicles < ActiveRecord::Migration def change create_table :vehicles do |t| t.string :name t.integer :mass t.timestamps end end end ``` For the derived classes, we use `cti_create_view(class_name)`, a method that dbview_cti adds to migrations: ```ruby class CreateMotorVehicles < ActiveRecord::Migration def change create_table :motor_vehicles do |t| t.references :vehicle t.string :fuel t.integer :number_of_wheels t.timestamps end cti_create_view('MotorVehicle') end end ``` There are two things to note in this migration: 1. The table references the table used for the parent class (vehicles in this case) 2. We call `cti_create_view(class_name)` to create the necessary database view and triggers, and to tell ActiveRecord to use the database view instead of the motor_vehicles table. The migrations for Car and MotorCycle are very similar (i.e. they reference the parent table and call cti_create_view): ```ruby class CreateCars < ActiveRecord::Migration def change create_table :cars do |t| t.references :motor_vehicle t.boolean :stick_shift t.boolean :convertible t.timestamps end cti_create_view('Car') end end class CreateMotorCycles < ActiveRecord::Migration def change create_table :motor_cycles do |t| t.references :motor_vehicle t.boolean :offroad t.timestamps end cti_create_view('MotorCycle') end end ``` After running `rake db:migrate` we can now use our new models, e.g. in the rails console: 1.9.3-p448 :001 > c = Car.new => # 1.9.3-p448 :003 > c.name = 'Audi' => "Audi" 1.9.3-p448 :004 > c.stick_shift = true => true 1.9.3-p448 :005 > c.save! => true Note that Car has all attributes of the vehicles, motor_vehicles and cars tables combined. When saving, the attributes are stored in their corresponding tables. ## Initializer When running the migrations and for some of the functionality (see e.g. the `convert_to` and `specialize` methods below), it is important that each class knows about the full class hierarchy. This is taken care of automatically when a class is loaded. However, in order to have full class hierarchy information all classes in the hierarchy have to be loaded, which is not necessarily the case since rails lazy-loads classes (e.g. in development mode). Therefore, we have to force loading of all classes by referencing the leaf-classes in the hierarchy in an initializer. For the example given above the leaf classes are Car and MotorCycle, so we put the following in an initializer (e.g. in `config/initializers/dbview_cti.rb`): ```ruby # Force loading of all classes in the CTI hierachy by referencing the leaf classes here Car MotorCycle ``` In development mode, Rails reloads files as you modify them. If a file in the class hierarchy is modified, all classes have to be reloaded, otherwise methods such as `specialize` and `convert_to` (see below) will no longer work correctly. To make sure the whole hierarchy is reloaded at every request (in development) we can modify the above initializer to: ```ruby # this block makes rails reload the code after each request in development mode Rails.configuration.to_prepare do # Force loading of all classes in the CTI hierachy by referencing the leaf classes here Car MotorCycle end ``` ## Associations Associations (`has_many`, `has_one`, etc.) work and are inherited as you would expect. There are three caveats: * In the base class, you have to call `cti_base_class` before defining any associations: ```ruby class Vehicle < ActiveRecord::Base # call cti_base_class first... cti_base_class # ...before defining any associations has_many :parts end ``` * In Rails 4 it might be necessary to explicitly specify the join table when using `has_and_belongs_to_many`: ```ruby class SpaceShip < Vehicle cti_derived_class has_and_belongs_to_many :astronauts, :join_table => 'astronauts_space_ships' end ``` * You have to make sure that the association is defined in both classes, e.g. if you have `belongs_to :car` in a class called Part then Car should also define the association with `has_many :parts` (or `has_one :part`). ## API ### Models dbview_cti adds two class methods to ActiveRecord::Base: * `cti_base_class`, which should be included in the class definition of the base class of the hierarchy. * `cti_derived_class`, which should be included in the class definition of every other class in the hierarchy. When either `cti_base_class` or `cti_derived_class` are used in the definition of a model, the model is equipped with the following instance methods: * `convert_to(class_name)`. Use this to convert an object to another class. Both `convert_to('MotorVehicle')` and `convert_to(:motor_vehicle)` are ok. Example: 1.9.3-p448 :003 > c = Car.create(:name => 'Audi') => # 1.9.3-p448 :004 > v = c.convert_to(:vehicle) => # 1.9.3-p448 :005 > v.convert_to(:car) # convert back to Car => # 1.9.3-p448 :009 > v.convert_to(:motor_cycle) # since v is a car we cannot convert it to a MotorCycle => nil * `specialize` converts an object to its 'true' (i.e. most specialized or most derived) class. Example: 1.9.3-p448 :010 > c = Car.create(:name => 'Volvo') => # 1.9.3-p448 :011 > mv = MotorVehicle.create(:name => 'Trike') => # 1.9.3-p448 :012 > c.convert_to(:vehicle).specialize => # 1.9.3-p448 :013 > mv.convert_to(:vehicle).specialize => # * `type` returns the 'true' (i.e. most specialized) class of an object (the class that the object is converted to when calling `specialize`). ### Migrations dbview_cti adds two methods to migrations: * `cti_create_view(class_name)` * `cti_drop_view(class_name)` See the example migrations above about how to use `cti_create_view`. `cti_drop_view` can be used to drop a view created by `cti_create_view` (e.g. in the `down` method of a migration.) It is also possible to recreate the database views (and triggers). This is necessary when you want to change one of the tables in the hierarchy, since then the views of all subclasses have to be recreated. dbview_cti provides the `cti_recreate_views_after_change_to(class_name)` method (to be used with a block) to do this: ```ruby class AddReliabilityToMotorVehicles < ActiveRecord::Migration def up cti_recreate_views_after_change_to('MotorVehicle') do add_column(:motor_vehicles, :reliability, :integer) end end def down cti_recreate_views_after_change_to('MotorVehicle') do remove_column(:motor_vehicles, :reliability) end end end ``` The `change` syntax is not (yet?) supported for recreating database views. ## Notes * Using dbview_cti doesn't interfere with foreign key constraints. In fact, I highly recommend adding foreign key constraints between the tables in a CTI hierarchy (e.g. using [foreigner](https://github.com/matthuhiggins/foreigner)). * When creating foreign key constraints involving tables that are part of the hierarchy, always refer to the tables themselves, not the views. When modifying the models in future migrations, the views may need to be recreated, which would cause problems with the foreign key constraints. * Take care when using database id's. Since the data for a Car object is spread over several tables, the id of a Car instance will generally be different than the id of the MotorVehicle instance you get when you convert the Car instance to a MotorVehicle. * The gem intercepts calls to destroy to make sure all rows in all tables are removed. This is not the case for delete_all, however, so avoid using delete_all for classes in the CTI hierarchy. ### Is it production ready? Yes, it is. I'm using it in production in two (relatively small) apps without any issues.