# Kookaburra # Kookaburra is a framework for implementing the [Window Driver] [Window Driver] pattern in order to keep acceptance tests maintainable. ## Installation ## Kookaburra is available as a Rubygem and [published on Rubygems.org] [Kookaburra Gem], so installation is trivial: gem install kookaburra If you're using [Bundler](http://gembundler.com/) for your project, just add the following: group :development, :test do gem 'kookaburra' end ## Setup ## Kookaburra abstracts some common patterns for implementing the Window Driver testing pattern for web applications. You will need to tell Kookaburra which classes contain the specific Domain Driver implementations for your application as well as which driver to use for running the tests (currently only tested with [Capybara] [Capybara]). Kookaburra is designed to run tests agains a remote web server (although that server could be running on the same machine, it doesn't need to be), and it is the responsibility of the test implementation to ensure that the server is running. Take a look at Kookaburra's own integration specs for one example of how to achieve this for a [Rack-based] [Rack] application. (Note that you cannot easily start the application server in a separate thread. Because Ruby uses green threads, the HTTP library used in the APIDriver will block while making its requests and prevent the application server thread from responding.) The fact that Kookaburra runs against a remote server means that *it is not limited to testing only Ruby web applications*. As long as your application exposes a web-service API for use by the GivenDriver and an HTML user interface for use by the UIDriver, you can use Kookaburra to test it. Also, as long as you're careful with both your application and test designs, you're not limited to running your tests only in an isolated testing environment; you could run the same test suite you use for development against your production systems and even repurpose your Kookaburra-based tests for load-testing and similar applications. ### RSpec ### For [RSpec] [RSpec] integration tests, just add the following to `spec/support/kookaburra_setup.rb`: require 'kookaburra/test_helpers' require 'my_app/kookaburra/given_driver' require 'my_app/kookaburra/ui_driver' # c.app_host below should be set to whatever the root URL of your running # application is. Kookaburra.configure do |c| c.given_driver_class = MyApp::Kookaburra::GivenDriver c.ui_driver_class = MyApp::Kookaburra::UIDriver c.app_host = 'http://my_app.example.com:1234' c.browser = Capybara c.server_error_detection { |browser| browser.has_css?('head title', :text => 'Internal Server Error') } end RSpec.configure do |c| c.include(Kookaburra::TestHelpers, :type => :request) end ### Cucumber ### For [Cucumber] [Cucumber], add the following to `features/support/kookaburra_setup.rb`: require 'kookaburra/test_helpers' require 'my_app/kookaburra/given_driver' require 'my_app/kookaburra/ui_driver' # c.app_host below should be set to whatever the root URL of your running # application is. Kookaburra.configure do |c| c.given_driver_class = MyApp::Kookaburra::GivenDriver c.ui_driver_class = MyApp::Kookaburra::UIDriver c.app_host = 'http://my_app.example.com:1234' c.browser = Capybara c.server_error_detection { |browser| browser.has_css?('head title', :text => 'Internal Server Error') } end World(Kookaburra::TestHelpers) This will cause the #k, #given and #ui methods will be available in your Cucumber step definitions. ## Defining Your Testing DSL ## Kookaburra extracts some common patterns that make it easier to use the Window Driver pattern along with various Ruby testing frameworks, but you still need to define your own testing DSL. An acceptance testing stack using Kookaburra has the following layers: 1. The **Business Specification Language** (Cucumber scenarios or other spcification documents) 2. The **Test Implementation** (Cucumber step definitions, RSpec example blocks, etc.) 3. The **Domain Driver** (Kookaburra::GivenDriver and Kookaburra::UIDriver) 4. The **Window Driver** (Kookaburra::UIDriver::UIComponent) 5. The **Application Driver** (Capybara and Kookaburra::APIDriver) ### The Business Specification Language ### The business specification language consists of the highest-level descriptions of a feature that are suitable for sharing with the non/less-technical stakeholders on a project. Gherkin is the external DSL used by Cucumber for this purpose, and you might have the following scenario defined for an e-commerce application: # purchase_items_in_cart.feature Feature: Purchase Items in Cart Scenario: Using Existing Billing and Shipping Information Given I have an existing account And I have previously specified default payment options And I have previously specified default shipping options And I have an item in my shopping cart When I sign in to my account And I choose to check out Then I see my order summary And I see that my default payment options will be used And I see that my default shipping options will be used Note that the scenario is focused on business concepts versus interface details, i.e. you "choose to check out" rather than "click on the checkout button". If for some reason your e-commerce system was going to be a terminal application rather than a web application, you would not need to change this scenario at all, because the actual business concepts described would not change (and although Kookaburra's focus is on testing web applications, it could likely be adapted to other environments.) ### The Test Implementation ### The Test Implementation layer exists as the line in between the Business Specification Language and the Domain Driver, and it includes Cucumber step definitions, RSpec example blocks, Test::Unit tests, etc. At this layer, your code orchestrates calls into the Domain Driver to mimic user interactions under various conditions and make assertions about the results. **Test assertions always belong within the test implementation layer.** Some testing frameworks such as RSpec add methods like `#should` to `Object`, which has the effect of poisoning the entire Ruby namespace with these methods---if you are using RSpec, you can call `#should` anywhere in your code and it will work when RSpec is loaded. Do not be tempted to call a testing library's Object decorators anywhere outside of your test implementation (such as within `UIDriver` or `UIComponent` subclasses.) Doing so will tightly couple your Domain Driver and/or Window Driver implementation to a specific testing library. `Kookaburra::UIDriver::UIComponent` provides an `#assert` method for use inside your own UIComponents. This method exists to verify preconditions and provide more informative error messages; it is not intended to be used for test verifications. `Kookaburra::TestHelpers` provides a convenient way to make assertions about the mental model. If you are using Test::Unit, see `Kookaburra::TestHelpers#assert_mental_model_of`; for RSpec, see `Kookaburra::TestHelpers#match_mental_model_of`. Given the Cucumber scenario above, here is how the test implementation layer might look: # step_definitions/various_steps.rb Given "I have an existing account" do given.existing_account end Given "I have previously specified default payment options" do given.default_payment_options_specified end Given "I have previously specified default shipping options" do given.default_shipping_options_specified end Given "I have an item in my shopping cart" do given.an_item_in_my_shopping_cart end When "I sign in to my account" do ui.sign_in end When "I choose to check out" do ui.choose_to_check_out end Then "I see my order summary" do ui.order_summary.should be_visible end Then "I see that my default payment options will be used" do ui.order_summary.payment_options.should match_mental_model_of(:default_payment_options) # Or if you prefer Test::Unit style assertions... # assert_mental_model_matches(:default_payment_options, ui.order_summary.payment_options) end Then "I see that my default shipping options will be used" do ui.order_summary.shipping_options.should match_mental_model_of(:default_shipping_options) end The step definitions contain neither explicitly shared state (instance variables) nor any logic branches; they are simply wrappers around calls into the Domain Driver layer. There are a couple of advantages to this approach. First, because step definitions are so simple, it isn't necessary to force *Very Specific Wording* on the business analyst/product owner who is writing the specs. For instance, if she writes "I see a summary of my order" in another scenario, it's not a big deal to have the following in your step definitions (as long as the author of the spec confirms that they really mean the same thing): Then "I see my order summary" do ui.order_summary.should be_visible end Then "I see a summary of my order" do ui.order_summary.should be_visible end The step definitions are nothing more than a natural language reference to an action in the Domain Driver; there is no overwhelming maintenance cost to the slight duplication, and it opens up the capacity for more readable Gherkin specs. The fewer false road blocks you put between your product owner and a written specification, the easier it becomes to ensure her participation in this process. The second advantage is that by pushing all of the complexity down into the Domain Driver, it's now trivial to reuse the exact same code in developer-centric integration tests. This ensures you have parity between the way the automated acceptance tests run and any additional testing that the development team needs to add in. Using RSpec, the test implementation would be as follows: # spec/integration/purchase_items_in_cart_spec.rb describe "Purchase Items in Cart" do example "Using Existing Billing and Shipping Information" do given.existing_account(:my_account) given.default_payment_options_specified_for(:my_account) given.default_shipping_options_specified_for(:my_account) given.an_item_in_my_shopping_cart(:my_account) ui.sign_in(:my_account) ui.choose_to_check_out ui.order_summary.should be_visible ui.order_summary.payment_options.should == k.get_data(:default_payment_options)[:my_account] ui.order_summary.shipping_options.should == k.get_data(:default_shipping_options)[:my_account] end end ### The Domain Driver ### The Domain Driver layer is where you build up an internal DSL that describes the business concepts of your application at a fairly high level. It consists of two top-level drivers: the `GivenDriver` (available via `#given`) used to set up state for your tests and the UIDriver (available via `#ui`) for describing the tasks that a user can accomplish with the application. #### Mental Model #### `Kookaburra::MentalModel` is the component via which the `GivenDriver` and the `UIDriver` share information, and it is intended to represent your application user's mental picture of the data they are working with. For instance, if you create a user account via the `GivenDriver`, you would store the login credentials for that account in the `MentalModel` instance, so the `UIDriver` knows what to use when you tell it to `#sign_in`. This is what allows the Cucumber step definitions to remain free from explicitly shared state. Kookaburra automatically configures your `GivenDriver` and your `UIDriver` to share a `MentalModel` instance, which is available to both of them via their `#mental_model` method. The `MentalModel` instance will return a `MentalModel::Collection` for any method called on the object. The `MentalModel::Collection` object behaves like a `Hash` for the most part; however, it will raise a `Kookaburra::UnknownKeyError` if you try to access a key that has not yet been assigned a value. Deletions (via `#delete` or `#delete_if`) will actually remove the key/value pair from the collection, but add it to a sub-collection (available at `MentalModel::Collection#deleted`). This reflects the fact that the user's mental model of the dataset would also include any intentional exceptions - the user will, for example, want to verify that an item they deleted does not appear to be available in the system. Here's an example of MentalModel behavior: mental_model = MentalModel.new mental_model.widgets[:widget_a] = {'name' => 'Widget A'} mental_model.widgets[:widget_a] #=> {'name' => 'Widget A'} # this will raise a Kookaburra::UnknownKeyError mental_model.widgets[:widget_b] mental_model.widgets.delete(:widget_a) #=> {'name' => 'Widget A'} # this will now also raise a Kookaburra::UnknownKeyError... mental_model.widgets[:widget_a] # ...but the pair is now available here: mental_model.widgets.deleted[:widget_a] #=> {'name' => 'Widget A'} #### Given Driver #### The `Kookaburra::GivenDriver` is used to create a particular "preexisting" state within your application's data and ensure you have a handle to that data (when needed) prior to interacting with the UI. You will create a subclass of `Kookaburra::GivenDriver` in which you will create part of the Domain Driver DSL for your application: # lib/my_app/kookaburra/given_driver.rb class MyApp::Kookaburra::GivenDriver < Kookaburra::GivenDriver # Specify the APIDriver to use def api @api ||= MyApp::Kookaburra::APIDriver.new(configuration) end def existing_account(nickname) account_data = {'display_name' => 'John Doe', 'password' => 'a password'} account_data['username'] = "test-user-#{`uuidgen`.strip}" # use the API to create the account in the application result = api.create_account(account_data) # merge in the password, since API (hopefully!) doesn't return it, and # store details in the MentalModel instance result.merge!('password' => account_data['password']) mental_model.accounts[nickname] = account_details end end Although there is nothing that actually *prevents* you from interacting with the UI in the `GivenDriver`, you should avoid doing so. The `GivenDriver`'s purpose is to describe state that exists *before* the user interaction that is being tested. Although this state may be the result of a previous user interaction, your tests will be much, much faster if you create this state via API calls rather than driving a web browser. #### API Driver #### The `Kookaburra::APIDriver` is used to interact with an application's external web services API. You tell Kookaburra about your API by creating a subclass of `Kookaburra::APIDriver` for your application. Because different applications may implement different types of APIs, Kookaburra will provide more than one base APIDriver class. At the moment, only a JSON API is supported via `Kookaburra::JsonApiDriver`: # lib/my_app/kookaburra/api_driver.rb class MyApp::Kookaburra::APIDriver < Kookaburra::JsonApiDriver def create_account(account_data) post '/api/v1/accounts', account_data end def get_account(id) get '/api/v1/accounts/%d' % id end end Regardless of the type of APIDriver, the content of your application's APIDriver should consist mainly of mappings between discrete actions and HTTP requests to the specified URL paths. Each driver will implement `#post`, `#get`, `#put` and `#delete` in such a way that any Ruby data structure provided as parameters will be appropriately translated to the API's required data format, and any response body from the API request will be translated into a Ruby data structure and returned. #### UI Driver #### `Kookaburra::UIDriver` provides the necessary tools for driving your application's user interface with the Window Driver pattern. You will subclass `Kookaburra::UIDriver` for your application and implement your testing DSL within your subclass: # lib/my_app/kookaburra/ui_driver.rb class MyApp::Kookaburra::UIDriver < Kookaburra::UIDriver # makes an instance of MyApp::Kookaburra::UIDriver::SignInScreen # available via the instance method #sign_in_screen ui_component :sign_in_screen, SignInScreen def sign_in(account_nickname) account = mental_model.accounts[account_nickname] address_bar.go_to(sign_in_screen) sign_in_screen.submit_login(account['username'], account['password']) end end ### The Window Driver Layer ### While your `GivenDriver` and `UIDriver` provide a DSL that represents actions your users can perform in your application, the [Window Driver] [Window Driver] layer describes the individual user interface components that the user interacts with to perform these tasks. By describing each interface component using an OOP approach, it is much easier to maintain your acceptance/integration tests, because the implementation details of each component are captured in a single place. For example, if/when the implementation of your application's sign in screen changes, you can fix every single test that needs to log a user into the system just by updating the `SignInScreen` class. You describe the various user interface components by sub-classing `Kookaburra::UIDriver::UIComponent`: # lib/my_app/ui_driver/sign_in_screen.rb class MyApp::Kookaburra::UIDriver::SignInScreen < Kookaburra::UIDriver::UIComponent def component_locator '#new_user_session' end def component_path '/session/new' end def username find('#session_username').value end def username=(new_value) fill_in '#session_username', :with => new_value end def password find('#session_password').value end def password=(new_value) fill_in '#session_password', :with => new_value end def submit click_on('Sign In') end def submit_login(username, password) self.username = username self.password = password submit end end ### The Application Driver Layer ### `Kookaburra::APIDriver`, `Kookaburra::UIDriver` and `Kookaburra::UIDriver::UIComponent` rely on the Application Driver layer to interact with your application. In the case of the `APIDriver`, Kookaburra uses the [Patron] [Patron] library to send HTTP requests to your application. The `UIDriver` and `UIComponent` rely on whatever is passed to `Kookaburra.new` as the `:browser` option. Presently, we have only used Capybara as the application driver for Kookaburra. It's possible that something other than Capybara could be passed in, as long as that something presented the same API. In reality, using something other than Capybara is likely to require some changes to Kookaburra itself. If you have a particular interest in making this work, please feel free to fork the project and send us a [GitHub pull request] [Pull Request] with your changes. ## Contributing to kookaburra ## * Check out the latest master to make sure the feature hasn't been implemented or the bug hasn't been fixed yet * Check out the issue tracker to make sure someone already hasn't requested it and/or contributed it * Fork the project * Start a feature/bugfix branch * Commit and push until you are happy with your contribution * Make sure to add tests for it. This is important so I don't break it in a future version unintentionally. * Please try not to mess with the Rakefile, version, or history. If you want to have your own version, or is otherwise necessary, that is fine, but please isolate to its own commit so I can cherry-pick around it. * Send us a [pull request] [Pull Request] ## Copyright ## Copyright © 2011 John Wilger. See LICENSE.txt for further details. [Window Driver]: http://martinfowler.com/eaaDev/WindowDriver.html "Window Driver - Martin Fowler" [Kookaburra Gem]: https://rubygems.org/gems/kookaburra "kookaburra | RubyGems.org | your community gem host" [Rack]: http://rack.rubyforge.org/ "Rack: a Ruby Webserver Interface" [Capybara]: https://github.com/jnicklas/capybara "jnicklas/capybara - GitHub" [RSpec]: http://rspec.info "RSpec.info: home" [Cucumber]: http://cukes.info/ "Cucumber - Making BDD fun" [Pull Request]: https://github.com/projectdx/kookaburra/pull/new/master "Send a pull request - GitHub" [Patron]: https://github.com/toland/patron "toland/patron"