Sha256: 2fb0fe5257336e4f42ab273e70425b1d6a66af2e3ef84791d47693253bf0a4b2
Contents?: true
Size: 1.54 KB
Versions: 1
Compression:
Stored size: 1.54 KB
Contents
Feature: Features integration Background: When I generate a new rails application And I generate resources "user post comment likes role account" And I generate resources "user post comment likes role account" in namespace "admin" And I generate resources "user post comment likes role account" in namespace "admin::control" And I configure the application to use rspec-rails And I run the rspec generator And I configure the application to use "shoulda_routing" Scenario: Support nested namespaces Given I write to "config/routes.rb" with: """ TestApp::Application.routes.draw do namespace :admin do resources :users do resources :posts, :comments end namespace :control do resources :roles, only: :index resources :accounts, except: :destroy end end resources :users do resources :posts, :comments end end """ And I write to "spec/routing/routing_spec.rb" with: """ require 'spec_helper' describe 'Routes' do namespace :admin do resources :users do resources :posts, :comments end namespace :control do resources :roles, only: :index resources :accounts, except: :update end end resources :users do resources :posts, :comments, :likes end end """ When I run routing specs Then the output should contain "63 examples, 9 failures"
Version data entries
1 entries across 1 versions & 1 rubygems
Version | Path |
---|---|
shoulda_routing-0.0.2 | features/integration.feature |