Sha256: 2ba9505a6c6be6b4a272940a4e8c6a82fcb910ee500a966b91abb29112600226
Contents?: true
Size: 702 Bytes
Versions: 2
Compression:
Stored size: 702 Bytes
Contents
# esotope benchmark This benchmark compares esotope and [escodegen](https://github.com/Constellation/escodegen) performance. ## Usage ``` $ cd benchmark/ $ npm install && npm test ``` ## Results **Machine used:** Intel Core i7-2700K @ 3.50GHz, 8 GB RAM, Windows 8 64-bit, node 64-bit With node v0.10.32: ``` esotope x 13.93 ops/sec ±3.45% (40 runs sampled) escodegen x 6.61 ops/sec ±0.83% (21 runs sampled) Fastest is esotope esotope is x2.11 times faster vs escodegen. ``` With node v0.11.14 (with newer v8 version): ``` esotope x 17.57 ops/sec ±0.60% (48 runs sampled) escodegen x 3.81 ops/sec ±3.94% (14 runs sampled) Fastest is esotope esotope is x4.61 times faster vs escodegen. ```
Version data entries
2 entries across 2 versions & 1 rubygems