XSLT(not!) with Elegant Dress

You'd swear XSLT is a joke, but it's not. It's cruelty. XSLT is like this: it's good to rid the city of this horrible vermin infestation-- Let's nuke the city. It's an out-of-proportion insanity. It's Turing-complete, and it's XML.

Hmm.

But what it is, is just a set of transformations on fragments of your XML document. The beauty of XSLT (they say), is that XSLT itself is XML, so you can (in principle) use XSLT to transform itself.

Hmm.

Oh I know, how about let's use Ruby?

Transformation Elegant Dress

Honestly, there's not much to it. A Dress is just a sequence of transformations you perform on a DOM tree. Unlike XSLT though, the transformations are performed directly on the DOM tree. That is to say, they are destructive.

This is a simple dress,

require 'dress'
doc = "<my><brain></brain></my>"
dress = Dress {
 match("brain") do
   set("size","pea")
 end
}
result = dress.on(doc)
puts result.to_s
# <my><brain "size"="pea"></brain></my>

We can have more matchers,

dress = Dress {
 match("brain") do
   set("size","pea")
 end
 match("my") do
   each { |e| e.name = "homer"}
 end
}
result = dress.on(doc)
puts result.to_s
# <homer><brain "size"="pea"></brain></homer>

Note that match always yield a Nokogiri::Nodeset. But sometimes we'd like to operate on just one node (or the first one we find). For that there's the at matcher.

dress = Dress {
  at("my") do
    me.name = "homer"
  end
}

me is always the object yielded by the matcher string. For match it would be a Nodeset, and for at, it would be an Element.

We can define helper methods on a Dress. This is one that implements a counter,

dress = Dress {
  def count
    @count ||= 0
    @count += 1
    @count
  end

  match("brain") do
    each { |e| e["area"] = count.to_s }
  end
}
puts dress.on(Nokogiri.make { my { brain; brain; brain; brain }}).to_s
# <my><brain area="1"></brain><brain area="2"></brain><brain area="3"></brain><brain area="4"></brain></my>

We can combine dresses into lines,

d1 = Dress { ... }
d2 = Dress { ... }
(d1 | d2).on(doc)

We can link lines together,

d3 = Dress { ... }
d4 = Dress { ... }
((d1 | d2) | (d3 | d4)).on(doc)

A dress is a class inheriting from Dress.

class FancyDress < Dress
  def helper1
  end
  def helper2
  end
  match(...) { ... }
  ...
end

class PrettyDress < Dress
  ...
end

Then we can combine these dresses,

(FancyDress | PrettyDress).on(document)

You can of course mix that with dynamic dresses,

(FancyDress | PrettyDress | Dress do ... end).on(doc)

That Wasn't So Hard, Was It?

So Ruby saved us all from XSLT. Minus all the XSLT-inspired buckets of tears, the world is a better place. FTW.

XSLT(not!) with Elegant Dress

Transformation Elegant Dress

That Wasn't So Hard, Was It?

Copyright