Sha256: 0ea0b9724e54af393e39ad303857772bad79fcfa6d1abe49baf5ac48c20352bf
Contents?: true
Size: 1.58 KB
Versions: 50
Compression:
Stored size: 1.58 KB
Contents
@rspec
Feature: Grouping on RSpec using a custom filter class
Next to passing a block or a string to define a group, you can also pass
a filter class. The filter class inherits from SimpleCov::Filter and
must implement the matches? method, which is used to determine whether
or not a file should be added to the group.
Scenario:
Given SimpleCov for RSpec is configured with:
"""
require 'simplecov'
class CoverageFilter < SimpleCov::Filter
def matches?(source_file)
source_file.covered_percent < filter_argument
end
end
SimpleCov.start do
add_group 'By filter class', CoverageFilter.new(90)
add_group 'By string', 'project/meta_magic'
end
"""
When I open the coverage report generated with `bundle exec rspec spec`
Then I should see the groups:
| name | coverage | files |
| All Files | 91.8% | 7 |
| By filter class | 78.26% | 2 |
| By string | 100.0% | 1 |
| Ungrouped | 100.0% | 4 |
And I should see the source files:
| name | coverage |
| lib/faked_project/framework_specific.rb | 75.0 % |
| lib/faked_project/some_class.rb | 80.0 % |
| lib/faked_project.rb | 100.0 % |
| lib/faked_project/meta_magic.rb | 100.0 % |
| spec/forking_spec.rb | 100.0 % |
| spec/meta_magic_spec.rb | 100.0 % |
| spec/some_class_spec.rb | 100.0 % |
Version data entries
50 entries across 50 versions & 14 rubygems