Sha256: 0418464995e98572ec6599ea8159809ad4ef54bfaddb25f5d1092a1b01d5b4e3
Contents?: true
Size: 1.93 KB
Versions: 2
Compression:
Stored size: 1.93 KB
Contents
module SimplePvr module Model class Programme include DataMapper::Resource storage_names[:default] = 'programmes' property :id, Serial property :title, String, index: true, :length => 255 property :subtitle, String, :length => 255 property :description, Text property :start_time, DateTime property :duration, Integer property :episode_num, String, index: true belongs_to :channel def self.clear Programme.destroy end def self.add(channel, title, subtitle, description, start_time, duration, episode_num) channel.programmes.create( channel: channel, title: title, subtitle: subtitle, description: description, start_time: start_time, duration: duration.to_i, episode_num: episode_num) end def self.with_title(title) Programme.all(title: title, order: :start_time) end def self.on_channel_with_title(channel, title) Programme.all(channel: channel, title: title, order: :start_time) end def self.on_channel_with_title_and_start_time(channel, title, start_time) Programme.all(channel: channel, title: title, start_time: start_time) end def self.titles_containing(text) # Maybe there's a smarter way to do substring search than constructing "%#{text}%"? I'd like # a version where the original input is escaped properly. However, this method is not # dangerous, it just means that the user can enter "%" or "_" in the search string for a # wildcard. Programme.all(:title.like => "%#{text}%", fields: [:title], order: :title, limit: 8, unique: true).map {|programme| programme.title } end def self.with_title_containing(text) # Same "LIKE" comments as above... Programme.all(:title.like => "%#{text}%", order: :start_time, limit: 20) end end end end
Version data entries
2 entries across 2 versions & 1 rubygems
Version | Path |
---|---|
simple_pvr-0.0.2 | lib/simple_pvr/model/programme.rb |
simple_pvr-0.0.1 | lib/simple_pvr/model/programme.rb |